|
|
||
 |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
BACKGROUND ESSAY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Illuminism
and the "Encyclopédie"
France borrowed Illuminism from England, the land of its birth. This adoption of Illuminism was brought about by the great admiration which the French world of culture felt toward all thing English. French thinkers preferred Locke to Descartes because the former traced philosophical problems back to their original basis, sensation. They admired Newton's mechanism and the English Constitution. In a word, the cultured French created for themselves an English myth. Letters, ties of friendship, and frequent trips across the Channel by noted Frenchmen of the times, such as Voltaire, are manifest proof of this lofty esteem for things English. However, French thinkers did not receive Illuminism passively. France was always the land of clear and distinct ideas; and as soon as Illuminism made its appearance there, French philosophers were able and quick to elicit the extreme consequences hidden beneath the surface of Illuminist thought. Promptly divining the far-reaching conclusions that could be drawn from Illuminism, the French adopted it as an efficacious and speedy means of relieving France from all the evils that had befallen her after the demise of the Sun King, Louis XIV. Thus if England was the birthplace of the new philosophy of the Enlightenment, France was to become the classic home of Illuminism. The French Illuminists placed full confidence in "reason," which they understood to mean common sense, a factor equally distributed among men. Neglect of the use of common sense has produced in the world class distinctions, differences in knowledge and language; it has fomented hatred and wars. Reason must undertake the task of abolishing or reducing these differences to a minimum; it must assume the office of formulating a universal knowledge and establishing a universal organization of peaceful peoples governed by universal laws. Nature should be the starting point in the process of effecting this new organization. But "nature" for French Illuminism meant human nature devoid of all moral and religious restraint. French Illuminism was hence eminently anti-historical and naturalistic, and consequently tended to give rise to countless problems of both a doctrinal and practical nature, the solutions to which are most contrary to historical tradition and the teachings of Christian philosophy. In the doctrinal field, Descartes, a Rationalist and spiritualist, was replaced by Locke, whose empiricism was rapidly reduced to simple sensism by the French philosophers. Newton's physical mechanism took the place of traditional metaphysics. Not only is the world a self-made machine, but man himself is a self-moving machine with no dependence whatsoever upon any principle superior to matter. The most outstanding protagonists of this atheistic materialism were:
O course not all French Illuminists were atheists as were La Mettrie and Holbach. Many of them, notably Diderot, Rousseau, Voltaire, proposed Deism in place of atheism, if not for speculative reasons, at least as a support and foundation for moral activity. Belief in God, in the immortality of the soul, and in a retribution in the life to come were affirmed in opposition to atheism. Voltaire, who fought as ardently against atheism as he did against the Church, wrote: 'If God did not exist, it would be necessary to invent Him. But all nature proclaims that He exists." In the field of religion, French Illuminism battled against the Catholic Church, its dogmas, its discipline, its hierarchy. The Church was judged responsible for all the errors of the past. In this bitter struggle against the Church, atheists like La Mettrie and Deists like Voltaire made common cause and cried out: "Ecrasez l'infame!" In politics, a new organization, English in pattern, was called forth to effect the reforms demanded by reason. This rational state was outlined by Charles Louis de Secondat, Baron de Montesquieu (1689-1775) in his book L'esprit des lois (The Spirit of Laws), which was widely read and made a great impression on the thinkers of all times. To spread and popularize these ideas, French Illuminism made use of a very powerful medium, the Dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers, or Encyclopédie, as it came to be called. This work which can be considered fundamental and which spread throughout France and the rest of Europe, was published between 1751 and 1780 in thirty-five volumes, including supplements, illustrations and indexes. The directors of the Encyclopédie were Jean Le Rond d'Alembert (1717?-1783), who wrote the famous Discours préliminaire as a preface, and Denis Diderot (1713-1784). However, many other Illuminists also contributed to the Encyclopédie, and for this reason this group of writers came to be known as the Encyclopedists. The most famous of the Encyclopedists were Voltaire and Rousseau. The most prominent figure of the French Illuminism and of European contemporary culture is Francois Marie Arouet, who took the name Voltaire (1694-1778). He was the author of many works, the most interesting from the point of view of philosophy being the following: Lettres anglaises ou philosophiques, Métaphysique de Newton, Eléments de la philosophie de Newton, and Dictionnaire philosophique.
|
Science
and Humanism in the French
Enlightenment, Reading
the French
Enlightenment,
|
|||||||
|
Enrich Your Life With a Philosophy Book...
|
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
|
||
|
|
||
[Homepage] [Newsletter] [Search] [Support the Academy] [Link to Us] [Contact the Academy] [Citing Articles from Our Website] [Privacy Policy & Disclaimer]
Copyright 1998-99, 2000-01, 2002-03, & 2004-05 by The Radical Academy. All Rights Reserved.
This Page Was Updated On