|
History of
Philosophy
Some
Preliminary Remarks for
Students About the History of
Philosophy
Philosophy is an edifice -- the highest and most
stable edifice -- of human reason, which moves from
the firm foundation of experience and rises to the
ultimate cause to justify that same experience.
In an abstract or absolute sense, philosophy
could be realized by healthy and efficient human
reason confronted with the riddle of the world and
of life, without tortuous twistings and turnings to
reach its goal. The history of philosophy shows us,
however, that the system of philosophy, as in the
case of all great human values, is not obtained
save through a gradual, painstaking process. To
explain or expound this slow, gradual process
through which human thought has constructed its
philosophy piece by piece -- not always advancing
-- is the office of the history of philosophy.
The historical development of philosophy has
come about particularly through four great
successive civilizations: Indian, Classic,
Christian, and Modern. These differ from one
another in the solutions which they have offered to
explain the problem of life.
Indian philosophy has had little or no influence
on Western civilization (although this may be
changing now), and it is for this reason that most
textbooks in the history of philosophy in the
Western world begin with the exposition of the
story of Classic civilization (history of Greek
philosophy) and then pass on to a consideration of
Christian and Modern civilization, expounding the
principal systems of each.
But it is licit to ask oneself: "From what point
should a history of philosophy begin its
exposition?" To begin with, absolutely speaking, we
should say that the history of philosophy opens
with the first appearance of man upon earth. Every
man, in whatsoever time and place he lives, cannot
but ask himself: "Why do I live on this earth?" and
attempt to give some answer to the question. For
this reason it is said that man is naturally
philosophical, and that he is philosophizing even
when he believes that he is not and even when he
denies the existence of philosophy.
In an objective exposition of a philosophic
system of history, it is necessary to keep in mind
the ideas not the men who have conceived them. This
is because the object of history is the ideas, the
theoretical element, and not the sentiments or
moral intentions of the philosophers.
It is useful to call the attention of students
who are studying or plan to study the history of
philosophy that they should not expect to find
actual progress in every unraveling of
philosophical thought. It is true that every
philosophical system indicates a development, an
actuation. But that is not to say that every
development and every actuation is for the better.
There is also a development toward error, which
indicates retrogression rather than progress. Hence
it is not necessary to affirm a priori that
every system which succeeds another is of necessity
better than the preceding. Progress is a fact which
must be ascertained a posteriori -- by
examination and comparison -- after one has
evaluated the system in question in regard to what
is the end of philosophy: the knowledge of absolute
reality, the solution of the problem of life.
Finally, let us note that the duty of the
historian of philosophy is to reconstruct
objectively the thought of the philosopher,
whatever it may be, prescinding from its
theoretical value or truth. Only after such work is
done in reconstruction will it be possible to pass
to external criticism. The history of philosophy
contains philosophy, but it also contains error;
for as has been said before, history does not
always relate signs of progress, but often recounts
regression as well. History hence should be
complemented by an external criticism, which judges
the validity or value of every system with
reference to the essentially philosophical problem:
the value of life.
|
Story
of Philosophy,
by
Will Durant
The
History of Western
Philosophy,
by
Bertrand Russell
|