|
Positive
and Negative
by Asher Ginzberg
Even when the world as a whole is at peace,
there is no rest or peace for its inhabitants.
Penetrate to the real life, be it of worms or of
men, and beneath the veil of peace you will find an
incessant struggle for existence, a constant round
of aggression and spoliation, in which every
victory involves a defeat and a death.
Yet we do distinguish between time of war and
time of peace. We reserve the term "war" for a
visible struggle between two camps, such as occurs
but seldom -- a struggle that we can observe, whose
causes and effects we can trace, from beginning to
end. But to all the continual petty wars between
man and man, of which we know in a general way that
they are in progress, but of which we cannot
envisage all the details and particulars, we give
the name of "peace," because such is the normal
condition of things.
In the spiritual world also there is war and
peace; and here also "peace" means nothing but a
number of continual petty wars that we cannot see
-- wars of idea against idea, of demand against
demand, of custom against custom. The very
slightest change in any department of life -- as,
for instance, the substitution of one letter for
another in the spelling of a word -- can only be
brought about by a battle and a victory; but these
tiny events happen silently, and escape observation
at the time. It is only afterwards, when the sum
total of all the changes has become a considerable
quantity, that men of intelligence look backwards,
and find to their astonishment that everything --
opinions, modes of life, speech, pronunciation --
has undergone vast changes. These changes appear to
have taken place automatically; we do not know in
detail when they came about, or through whose
agency.
Peace, then, is the name that we give to a
continuous, gradual development. But in the
spiritual world, as in the material, there is
sometimes a state of war; that is, a visible
struggle between two spiritual camps, two complete
systems, the one new, the other old. The
preparations for such a war are made under cover,
deep down in the process of continuous development.
It is only when all is in readiness that the war
breaks out openly, with all its drums and
tramplings; and then a short space of time sees the
most far-reaching changes.
The character of these changes, as well as the
general course of the war, depends chiefly on the
character of the new system of thought that raises
the storm. They differ according as the system is
wholly positive, wholly negative, or partly
positive and partly negative.
A new positive system comes into
existence when the process of continuous
development produces in the minds of a select few
some new positive concept. This may be either a
belief in some new truth not hitherto accepted by
society, or the consciousness of some new need not
hitherto felt by society; generally the two go
together. This new conception, in accordance with a
well-known psychological law, gives rise to other
conceptions of a like nature, all of which
strengthen one another, and become knit together,
till at last they form a complete system. The
center point of the system is the new positive
principle; and round this center are grouped a
number of different beliefs, feelings, impulses,
needs, and so forth, which depend on it and derive
their unity from it.
A new system such as this, though essentially
and originally it is wholly positive, cannot help
including unconsciously some element of negation.
That is to say, it cannot help coming into contact,
on one side or another, with some existing system
that covers the same ground. It may not damage the
essential feature, the center, of the old system;
but it will certainly damage one of the conceptions
on its circumference, or, at the very least, it
will lessen the strength of men's attachment to the
old principles. When, therefore, the reformers
begin to put their system into practice, to strive
for the attainment of what they need by the methods
in which they believe, their action necessarily
arouses opposition on the part of the more devoted
adherents of the old system, with which the
reformers have unwittingly come into conflict. The
result of this opposition is that the new system
spreads, and attracts to its ranks all those who
are adapted to receive it. As their number
increases, the animosity of their opponents grows
in intensity; and so the opposition waxes stronger
and stronger, until it becomes war to the
knife.
At first the disciples of the new teaching are
astounded at the accusations hurled at them. They
find themselves charged with attempting to
overthrow established principles; and they protest
bitterly that no such thought ever entered their
minds. They protest with truth: for, indeed, their
whole aim is to add, not to take away. Intent on
their task of addition, they overlook the negation
that follows at its heels; even when the negation
has been made plain by their opponents, they strive
to keep it hidden from others, and to ignore its
existence themselves, and they do not recognize the
artificiality of the means by which they attain
this end.
The older school, on the other hand, who derive
all their inspiration from the old doctrine, are
quick to see or feel the danger threatened by the
new teaching; and they strive, therefore, to uproot
the young plant while it is still tender. But as a
rule they do not succeed. Despite their efforts,
the new system finds its proper place; gradually
the two systems, the new and the old, lose some of
their more sharply opposed characteristics, share
the forces of society between them in proportion to
their relative strength, and ultimately come to
terms and live at peace. By this process society
has been enriched; its tree of life has gained a
new branch; its spiritual equipment has received a
positive addition.
|
Every
Person's Guide to Jewish Philosophy and
Philosophers,
by
Ronald H. Isaacs
|