CONTEMPORARY
PHILOSOPHY
OF THE SPIRIT
The first period of Recent Philosophy entailed a
critical revision of positivism, including German
Psychologism, the New Positivism, and American
Pragmatism. The second period of Recent Philosophy
is marked by several attempts to rebuild a
metaphysics, commonly termed "spiritualistic," a
metaphysics opposed to materialism in that it
accepts the existence of a spiritual element in
man. A few of these attempts will be discussed in
this section.
I.
INTUITIONISM
Henri
Bergson
(1859-1941)
The founder and most famous exponent of
Intuitionism is Henri Bergson (picture),
who lectured at the University of Paris, and whose
thought spread throughout the world. His
fundamental work is Creative Evolution.
Bergson adopts as his own Heraclitus' principle:
"All things flow." Reality is a continuous
becoming, an ever new process of creation, without
beginning and without end, which never repeats an
identical pattern but assumes ever new aspects.
Every new aspect gives a new life to the past in a
vital moving continuity, like that of a river
branching out into a thousand tributaries.
The profound principle of this eternally flowing
reality is the "vital impetus," which is not
grasped through an abstract concept, but through an
act of intuition by means of which we literally
submerge ourselves in the flowing stream of
reality. Likewise, the deep ego of our personality
is not the object of a superficial observation of
our empirical life but an act of intuition.
Of course, for such a metaphysics there exists
an analogous theory of knowledge which belittles
concepts. For Bergson, concepts solidify reality;
they stop the flowing stream of the life of
reality; they fix it between rigid outlines, much
in the fashion that the camera freezes reality on
the surface of the print. According to Bergson,
concepts deform reality. Reality, in its continuous
movement, is richer than any concept. Such a
richness is known only by intuition, an immediate
and interior form of knowledge.
In The Radical
Academy
Elsewhere On The
Internet
II.
THE NEW IDEALISM
English
Neo-Hegelianism
During the final decades of the nineteenth
century many English thinkers adopted Hegelian
Idealism with the intention of opposing Positivism
and of restoring the value of religion.
Representative of this movement are Thomas Hill
Green (1836-1882), Francis Herbert Bradley
(1846-1924), John M'Taggart (1866-1925), and
Bernard Bosanquet (1848-1923). They maintain that
reality develops itself according to Hegelian
dialectic, culminating in an absolute
Consciousness. But they discard Hegel's system in
their interpretation of this absolute
Consciousness.
For them, the Absolute is not immanent in
reality and identified with the process of
"becoming," but is separate and Platonically
conceived -- as a stable and perfect being standing
apart from any movement and becoming. This Platonic
conception of reality gave rise to the question of
determining the relations between the Absolute and
the world. The English thinkers held that there are
no relations, because God is absolutely "the other"
and completely opposite to the world; the human
mind cannot reach Him in any way.
In The Radical
Academy
Thomas
Hill Green
(1836-1882)
T.H. Green (picture)
was born on April 7, 1836 and died on March 26,
1882. He was an English idealist philosopher who
studied at Oxford and was eventually appointed a
professor there. The tradition of empiricism was
deeply rooted in British philosophy, and Green
produced a major critique of this tradition in the
introduction to an 1875 edition of the works of
David Hume, of which he was coeditor. Green's
positive philosophy strongly reflected Hegel's
idealism.
"Shut up your Mill and Spencer," Green,
professor of moral philosophy at Oxford, admonished
his audience, "and open your Kant and Hegel." Green
repudiated the whole tradition of British
philosophy, especially Locke and Hume, and became
the leader of the opposition against positivism and
utilitarianism in England. His oratoric power
enabled him to convert many British students of
philosophy to German idealism. He praised Kant's
categories as "the connective tissue of the known
world," derived from Kant his conception of
self-distinguishing consciousness as a combining
agency, and, although he did not adopt Hegel's
dialectical method, he did agree with him regarding
history and organized society as embodiments of
divine will.
He flatly rejected Locke's and Hume's assumption
that sensations are the raw material of knowledge.
According to Green, every experience takes place by
forming relations which, consequently, are the real
elements of that which is regarded as sensation.
Since relations are the work of human mind, reality
is characterized as essentially spiritual.
Bitterly opposed as Green was to Darwin, his
mind was nevertheless influenced by biological as
well as Hegelian evolutionism. He held that an
animal organism, which has its history in time,
gradually becomes the vehicle of an eternally
complete consciousness, which, in itself, can have
a history of the process by which the animal
organism becomes its vehicle. Green even described
mystical union as an evolutionary process. He
exposed the foundations of his metaphysics and
ethics in his Prolegomena to Ethics
(1883).
Through Green's influence, idealism enjoyed a
period of prominence in British philosophy. F. H.
Bradley and Bernard Bosanquet, leading members of
this movement, were both indebted to Green.
In The Radical
Academy
Elsewhere On The
Internet
Francis
Herbert Bradley
(1846-1924)
An English philosopher at Oxford, Francis
Herbert Bradley (picture)
was born on January 30, 1846 and died on September
18, 1924.
He was the most famous metaphysician in the
British school of absolute idealism. He wrote many
books on topics in metaphysics, logic, and
ethics.
In his youth, Bradley accepted a fellowship at
Merton College, Oxford, tenable for life, but
terminable at marriage. He enjoyed its benefits for
more than half a century. An an athlete at
University College, he contracted typhoid fever and
subsequently suffered from an inflammation of the
kidneys. These illnesses probably resulted in his
being a crotchety recluse. Yet his literary efforts
have polish, style, and even humor. His
Appearance and Reality (1893) and Essays
on Truth and Reality (1914) are philosophical
classics. His Collected Essays was published
in 1935
Bradley was, at first, a disciple of Hegel. He
lost sympathy with Hegelian philosophy, and
subsequently he opposed utilitarianism and
supported the ethics of Kant, by insisting that
good will was a universal principle, as well as a
human quality. He found, by testing the relation of
each claim to fundamental reality, that experience,
as such, is nonrelational and contains within
itself the essential features of thought which make
for explicit logic. He stated that truth can only
reside in judgment; that not all judgments are
true; that when a subject is circumspect and
sufficiently inclusive, then its judgment is true;
and that truth really requires the absolute.
Bradley lucidly restated the fundamental idealism
and spiritual monism that form the bases for the
analysis of individual experience. This analysis
gradually developes into the realization of a
universal coherent unity, infinite in
character.
Essentially, Bradley's metaphysics begins with
the notion of immediate experience. Thought and
judgment require, however, that one pass beyond
this, in that thought abstracts from experience,
and such abstraction leads to contradictions. Since
everything that a person says about the world is
riddled with contradictions, it is mere appearance,
not reality. Metaphysics therefore attempts to find
a view that can satisfy the intellect and be true
and thus self-consistent. This can only be found in
the absolute. Although the absolute cannot be
grasped by thought, it is not totally unknowable
because various features of experience suggest what
it must be like. The absolute is an "all-inclusive
and super-relational experience," in which all
experiences are transcended.
In The Radical
Academy
Elsewhere On The
Internet
Bernard
Bosanquet
(1848-1923)
Bernard Bosanquet (picture)
was born on June 14, 1848, and died on February 8,
1923. He was a British philosopher known for his
reinterpretation of G. W. F. Hegel. Devoted to the
application of philosophy to everyday life, he gave
up his teaching post at Oxford in 1881 to engage in
writing and social service. Bosanquet's primary
concern was with individuals and individuality;
however, he considered only the Absolute to be a
genuine individual. Hence, humans should strive for
unification with the Absolute.
Bosanquet was the best known (next to Bradley)
of the British idealist philosophers. He descended
from an old Huguenot family. For eleven years he
lectured on Greek history and philosophy and then
he left this to devote himself to charity and the
study of ethics, logic, and aesthetics.
His interests, later shared by his wife,
included the London Ethical Society and the Charity
Organization Society. This work was not the hobby
of a leisure-class gentleman, but the practical
application of Bosanquet's philosophy.
His emphasis was on the importance of the
individual, the fruition of a cosmoramic view which
could only be realized in the individual.
Accordingly, he defined the Absolute (and in this
he was profoundly influenced by Hegel) not as a
personality lacking coherence and unity, but as a
whole being. Similarly in his logic, he defined
truth as a cohering, compresive whole. He perceived
ethids as the endeavor towards a unity of pleasure
and responsibility, all the while emphasizing the
importance of the individual in his relationships
with others. His philosophy may be said to bear the
stamp of conciliation.
His personal charm, his sympathetic attitudes,
and his "critically appreciative powers" were
hallmarks of his warm personality. His writings
include Knowledge and Reality, A History
of Aesthetic, The Essentials of Logic,
The Psychology of the Moral Self, and The
Philosophic Theory of the State.
In The Radical
Academy
Elsewhere On the
Internet
American
Idealism
Please see: American
Idealism in the American Philosophy
section.
Positive contributions of
the above philosophers and philosophical movements
to the Perennial Philosophy
Virtually none. It should be recalled that
metaphysical idealism in any form is antithetical
to a genuine realistic philosophy.
Enrich
Your Life With a Philosophy
Book...
|