|
The
Interdependence of the Sciences
by Hermann von Helmholtz
Men of science form, as it were, an organized
army, laboring on behalf of the whole nation, and
generally under its direction, and at its expense,
to augment the stock of such knowledge as may serve
to promote industrial enterprise, to increase
wealth, to adorn life, to improve political and
social relations, and to further the moral
development of individual citizens. After the
immediate practical results of their work we
forbear to inquire; that we leave to the
instructed. We are convinced that whatever
contributes to the knowledge of the forces of
nature or the powers of the human mind is worth
cherishing, and may, in its own due time, bear
practical fruit, very often where we should least
have expected it. Who, when Galvani touched the
muscles of a frog with different metals, and
noticed their contraction, could have dreamt that
eighty years afterward, in virtue of the selfsame
process, whose earliest manifestations attracted
his attention in his anatomical researches, all
Europe would be traversed with wires, flashing
intelligence from Madrid to St. Petersburg with the
speed of lightning? In the hands of Galvani, and at
first even in Volta's, electrical currents were
phenomena capable of exerting only the feeblest
forces, and could not be detected except by the
most delicate apparatus. Had they been neglected,
on the ground that the investigation of them
promised no immediate practical result, we should
now be ignorant of the most important and most
interesting of the links between the various
sources of nature. When young Galileo, then a
student at Pisa, noticed one day during divine
service a chandelier swinging backward and forward,
and convinced himself, by counting his pulse, that
the duration of the oscillations was independent of
the arc through which it moved, who could know that
this discovery would eventually put it in our
power, by means of the pendulum, to attain an
accuracy in the measurement of time till then
deemed impossible, and would enable the
storm-tossed seaman in the most distant oceans to
determine in what degree of longitude he was
sailing?
Whoever, in the pursuit of science, seeks after
immediate practical utility, may generally rest
assured that he will seek in vain. All that science
can achieve is a perfect knowledge and a perfect
understanding of the action of natural and moral
forces. Each individual student must be content to
find his reward in rejoicing over new discoveries,
enjoying the aesthetic beauty of a well-ordered
field of knowledge, where the connection and the
filiation of every detail is clear to the mind, and
where all denotes the presence of a ruling
intellect; he must rest satisfied with the
consciousness that he too has contributed something
to the increasing fund of knowledge on which the
dominion of man over all the forces hostile to
intelligence reposes....
The sciences have, in this respect, all one
common aim, to establish the supremacy of
intelligence over the world: while the moral
sciences aim directly at making the resources of
intellectual life more abundant and more
interesting, and seek to separate the pure gold of
Truth from alloy, the physical sciences are
striving indirectly toward the same goal, inasmuch
as they labor to make mankind more and more
independent of the material restraints that fetter
their activity. Each student works in his own
department, he chooses for himself those tasks for
which he is best fitted by his abilities and his
training. But each one must be convinced that it is
only in connection with others that he can further
the great work, and that therefore he is bound, not
only to investigate, but to do his utmost to make
the results of his investigation completely and
easily accessible. If he does this, he will derive
assistance from others, and will in his turn be
able to render them his aid. The annals of science
abound in evidence of how such mutual services have
been exchanged, even between departments of science
apparently most remote. Historical chronology is
essentially based on astronomical calculations of
eclipses, accounts of which are preserved in
ancient histories. Conversely, many of the
important data of astronomy -- for instance, the
invariability of the length of the day, and the
periods of several comets, rest upon ancient
historical notices. Of late years, physiologists,
especially Brucke, have actually undertaken to draw
up a complete system of all the vocables that can
be produced by the organs of speech, and to base
upon it propositions for a universal alphabet,
adapted to all human languages. Thus physiology has
entered the service of comparative philology, and
has already succeeded in accounting for many
apparently anomalous substitutions, on the ground
that they are governed, not as hitherto supposed,
by the laws of euphony, but by similarity between
the movements of the mouth that produce them.
Again, comparative philology gives us information
about the relationships, the separations, and the
migrations of tribes in prehistoric times, and of
the degree of civilization which they had reached
at the time when they parted. For the names of
objects to which they had already learnt to give
distinctive appellations reappear as words common
to their later languages. So that the study of
languages actually gives us historical data for
periods respecting which no other historical
evidence exists. Yet again I may notice the help
which not only the sculptor, but the archaeologist,
concerned with the investigation of ancient
statues, derives from anatomy. And if I may be
permitted to refer to my own most recent studies, I
would mention that it is possible, by reference to
physical acoustics and to the physiological theory
of the sensation of hearing, to account for the
elementary principles on which our musical system
is constructed, a problem essentially within the
sphere of aesthetics. In fact, it is a general
principle that the physiology of the organs of
sense is most intimately connected with psychology,
inasmuch as physiology traces in our sensations the
results of mental processes which do not fall
within the sphere of consciousness, and must
therefore have remained inaccessible to us.
I have been able to quote only some of the most
striking instances of this interdependence of
difference sciences, and such as could be explained
in a few words. Naturally, too, I have tried to
choose them from the most widely separated
sciences. But far wider is of course the influence
which allied sciences exert upon each other.
Excerpted from Popular
Lectures on Scientific Subjects, by Hermann von
Helmholtz.
|
At
Amazon Books

Science
and Culture: Popular and Philosophical Essays, by
Hermann von Helmholtz

Hermann
Von Helmholtz and the Foundations of
Nineteenth-Century Science (California Studies in
the History of Science, No 12)
|