|
The
Principles of Scientific Knowledge
by Paul Haeberlin
Knowledge supposes correct thinking. Correct
thinking lies in correct judgment. The essence of
knowledge is the absolute correctness of judgment.
The task of knowledge is to make correct judgment.
Its object is the content of this judgment.
Judgment does not mean any single judgment or the
judgment of a definite judging subject, e.g., a
human subject, but judgment altogether, and
therewith judgment independent of the kind of the
subject. The absolute judging subject corresponds
to the absolute judgment. This is, however, of
lesser importance than the fact that knowledge is
correct thinking and therefore can be found only in
correct judgment. In this connection, "correctness"
means absolute correctness or objective
correctness. But when is judgment in this sense
correct? There is only one possible answer to this
question. It can only be found if one considers
that all judging is acting, that every judgment is
an action. An action is correct in this object
sense if it corresponds to an absolutely valid
objective demand, or, as we also can say, if it is
the realization of a norm. The concept of
correctness of acting supposes the concept of an
objective norm. The norm of acting corresponds to
absolutely correct acting. Furthermore, if judging
is a modification of acting, the concept of
correctness of judgment supposes the concept of
norm of judgment as a definite modification of the
norm of acting altogether. The absolute norm of
judgment corresponds to the correct judgment, and
is the modification of the norm altogether. Correct
judgment is the realization of this norm of
judgment. A judgment is correct if it fulfills its
norm of judgment and therewith fulfills, on its
part and in its way, the norm of judgment.
Knowledge, as totality of correct judgment,
consequently, means the realization of the absolute
norm of judgment.
Every judgment has a content, or, as we also
could say, a result. That means what is "made" by
the judgment, in the sense of a position or
statement. For every judgment does notify
something, and this something is just its content.
But such a statement is an action by means of which
that something is formed; in as far the content is
a formation. The content of a correct judgment is
correctly formed. It is a correct formation. In
general, we characterize the correctness of a
formation made by judgment, in contradistinction to
a formation by action altogether, as truth. Correct
judgments have true contents. The content of
correct judgment altogether is the very truth.
Truth, therefore, is the content of knowledge. The
correct judgment, consequently, can also be defined
from the viewpoint of the content. A judgment is
correct if its content is true. This definition is
quite as valid as the inverse: the content of
judgment is true if the judgment is correct. Both
of them mean realization of the norm of
judgment.
Excerpted from The Object of
Psychology, by Paul Haeberlin
|
|