|
Involution
by André Lalande
Science is not "a development of the Homogeneous
toward the Heterogeneous," like the increase of
species, but it is a free assimilation of one mind
to another, of one thing to another, of the things
to the minds. That is rather easily recognized. But
social progress, if observed without prejudice,
becomes manifest not so much as an equilibrium
organized by individual ambitions as rather as an
involution. That, above all, must penetrate
today into common sense. It must be inculcated as
deeply as the contrary prejudice has been
inculcated. Practically, an improvement has taken
place and continues to proceed through the lowering
and even the extinction of the organic structures
whereto social life at first had evolved
spontaneously. The dissolution of the rule of caste
and slavery, whose meticulous social
differentiation was by heredity, has given room to
aristocratic societies which were already less
biomorphical but still neighboring, by virtue of
their "states," to the organic structure of the
living bodies and the societies of the animals;
then these aristocratic societies have been
dissolved almost everywhere into egalitarian states
which appeal to an ideal of assimilation among
their citizens. At the same time it has become
evident that these egalitarian states are less
warlike than the monarchies, dictatorships and
oligarchies.
It might be objected that this great
involution does not exclude inverse
movements. Industrial, commercial, financial
struggles are too clear examples of that fact. But
when vast transformations of the entire status are
at stake, there is no progress that is not
accompanied by return-currents and reactionary
turns. Who is the philosophical mind that would
consider mercantilism a progress of civilization,
or be happy that an oligarchy of money was
established upon the ruins of an aristocracy of
birth?
At the same time, the progress of civilization
has universalized the principles and formulas of
the law. There will be noticed also an assimilation
of singular rapidity between the social functions
of men and those of women, and a retrogression of
the old forms of the family which had been
organically differentiated. ...
The essential task of science in our epoch is to
make human masses understand that the imago
mundi that led the first years of the 19th
century back in the direction of barbary, has not
been confirmed by an impartial and scientific
reflection. ... Without any doubt, the individual
cannot live without conceding a minimum of
satisfaction to its egoistical needs, and it is the
same with the nations and social groups. But that
is a concession and not an ideal.
Excerpted from On the Mission
of Philosophy in Our Time (Actes du
Huitième Congres Internationale de
Philosophie, 1943).
|
Vocabulaire
Technique
Et
Critique De La
Philosophie,
by
Andre Lalande
|