|
On
Liberty
by John Stuart Mill
Liberty of the
Individual
There is a sphere of action in which society, as
distinguished from the individual, has, if any only
an indirect interest; comprehending all that
portion of a person's life and conduct which
affects only himself or if it also affects others,
only with their free, voluntary, and undeceived
consent and participation. When I say only himself,
I mean directly, and in the first instance: for
whatever affects himself may affect others through
himself; and the objection which may be grounded in
this contingency, will receive consideration in the
sequel. This, then, is the appropriate region of
human liberty. It comprises, first, the inward
domain of consciousness; demanding liberty of
conscience, in the most comprehensive sense;
liberty of thought and feeling; absolute freedom of
opinion and sentiment on all subjects, practical or
speculative, scientific, moral, or theological. The
liberty of expressing and publishing opinions may
seem to fall under a different principle, since it
belongs to that part of the conduct of an
individual which concerns other people; but, being
almost of as much importance as the liberty of
though itself, and resting in great part on the
same reasons, is practically inseparable from it.
Secondly, the principle requires liberty of tastes
and pursuits; of framing the plan of our life to
suit our own character; of doing as we like,
subject to such consequences as may follow; without
impediment from our fellow creatures, so long as
what we do does not harm them, even though they
should think our conduct foolish, perverse, or
wrong. Thirdly, from this liberty of each
individual, follows the liberty, within the same
limits, of combination among individuals; freedom
to unite, for any purpose not involving harm to
others; the persons combining being supposed to be
of full age, and not forced or deceived.
No society in which these liberties are not, on
the whole, respected, is free, whatever may be its
form of government; and never is completely free in
which they do not exist absolute and
unqualified.
The Triumph of
Truth
The dictum that truth always triumphs over
persecution, is one of those pleasant falsehoods
which men repeat after one another till they pass
into commonplaces, but which all experience
refutes. History teems with instances of truth put
down by persecution. If not suppressed forever, it
may be thrown back for centuries. To speak only of
religious opinions: the Reformation broke out at
least twenty times before Luther, and was put
down.... Even after the era of Luther, wherever
persecution was persisted in, it was successful. In
Spain, Italy, Flanders, the Austrian Empire,
Protestantism was rooted out; and most likely,
would have been so in England, had Queen Mary
lived, or Queen Elizabeth died. Persecution has
always succeeded, save where the heretics were too
strong a party to be effectually persecuted. No
reasonable person can doubt that Christianity might
have been extirpated in the Roman Empire. It
spread, and became predominant, because the
persecutions were only occasional, lasting but a
short time, and separated by long intervals of
almost undisturbed propagandism. It is a piece of
idle sentimentality that truth, merely as truth,
has any inherent power denied to error, of
prevailing against the dungeon and the stake. Men
are not more zealous for truth than they often are
for error, and a sufficient application of legal or
even of social penalties will generally succeed in
stopping the propagation of either. The real
advantage which truth has, consists in this, that
when an opinion is true, it may be extinguished
once, twice, or many times, but in the course of
ages there will generally be found persons to
rediscover it, until some one of its reappearances
falls on a time when from favorable circumstances
it escapes persecution until it has made such head
as to withstand all subsequent attempts to suppress
it.
Individual and
State
The worth of a State, in the long run, is the
worth of the individuals composing it; and a State
which postpones the interests of their
mental expansion and elevation, to a little more of
administrative skill, or that semblance of it which
practice gives, in the details of business; a State
which dwarfs its men, in order that they may be
more docile instruments in its hands even for
beneficial purposes, will find that with small men
no great thing can really be accomplished; and that
the perfection of machinery to which it has
sacrificed everything, will in the end avail it
nothing, for want of the vital power which, in
order that the machine might work more smoothly it
has preferred to banish.
The Purest of
Wisdom
When we consider either the history of opinion,
or the ordinary conduct of human life, to what is
to be ascribed that the one and the others are no
worse than they are? No certainly to the inherent
force of the human understanding; for, on any
matter not self-evident, there are ninety-nine
persons totally incapable of judging it, for one
who is capable; and the capacity of the hundredth
person is only comparative; for the majority of the
eminent men of every past generation held many
opinions now known to be erroneous, and did or
approved numerous things which no one will now
justify. Why is it, then, that there is on the
whole a preponderance among mankind of rational
opinions and rational conduct? If there really is
this preponderance -- which there must be, unless
human affairs are, and have always been, in an
almost desperate state -- it is owing to a quality
of the human mind, the source of everything
respectable in man either as an intellectual or as
a moral being, namely, that his errors are
corrigible. He is capable of rectifying his
mistakes, by discussion and experience. Not by
experience alone. There must be discussion, to show
how experience is to be interpreted. Wrong opinions
and practices gradually yield to fact and argument:
but facts and arguments, to produce any effect on
the mind, must be brought before it. Very few facts
are able to tell their own story, without comments
to bring out their meaning. The whole strength and
value, then, of human judgment, depending on the
one property, that it can be set right when it is
wrong, reliance can be placed on it only when the
means of setting it right are kept constantly at
hand. In the case of any person whose judgment is
really deserving of confidence how has it become
so? Because he has kept his mind open to criticism
of his opinions and conduct. Because it has been
his practice to listen to all that could be said
against him; to profit by as much of it as was
just, and expound to himself, and upon occasion to
others, the fallacy of what was fallacious. Because
he has felt, that the only way in which a human
being can make some approach to knowing the whole
of a subject, is by hearing what can be said about
it by persons of every variety of opinion, and
studying all modes in which it can be looked at by
every character of mind. No wise man ever acquired
his wisdom in any other manner.
Man the
Individual
He who lets the world, or his own portion of it,
choose his plan of life for him, has no need of any
other faculty than the ape-like one of imitation.
He who chooses his plan for himself employs all his
faculties. He must use observation to see,
reasoning and judgment to foresee, activity to
gather materials for decision, discrimination to
decide, and when he has decided, firmness and
self-control to hold to his deliberate decision.
And these qualities he requires and exercises
exactly in proportion as the part of his conduct
which he determines according to his own judgment
and feelings is a large one. It is possible that he
might be guided in some good path, and kept out of
harm's way, without any of these things. But what
will be his comparative worth as a human being? It
really is of importance, not only what men do, but
what manner of men they are that do it. Among the
works of man, which human life is rightly employed
in perfecting and beautifying, the first in
importance is surely man himself. Supposing it were
possible to get houses built, corn grown, battles
fought, causes tried, and even churches erected and
prayers said, by machinery -- by automatons in
human form -- it would be a considerable loss to
exchange for these automatons even the men and
women who at present inhabit the more civilized
parts of the world, and who assuredly are but
starved specimens of what nature can and will
produce. Human nature is not a machine to be built
after a model, and set to do exactly the work
prescribed for it, but a tree, which requires to
grow and develop itself on all sides, according to
the tendency of the inward forces which make it a
living thing.
Excerpted from On
Liberty, by John Stuart Mill (1859).
Read
more about John Stuart Mill in the Adventures
in Philosophy section. Read
more about Mill's philosophy in the Classic
Philosophers section. Find
books by and about John Stuart Mill in The
Radical Academy Bookstore.
|
On
Liberty, by John Stuart Mill
|