|
THE
SUCCESSORS OF KANT
The three "Critiques" of Kant pointed to the
organizing activity of the "thinking-ego." After
Kant, thinkers logically developed the function of
the thinking-ego, and came to the conclusion that
its activity is not limited to the organization of
phenomena, but implies the production of phenomena.
Thus the ego is conceived of as a creative power.
This concept of the creativity of the spirit gave
origin in Germany to two movements -- the first, a
cultural movement called Romanticism; the second, a
philosophical one called Idealism.
Background Essay
The
Transition From Criticism To Romanticism
and
The Transition
From Criticism To Transcendental
Idealism
Elsewhere On the
Internet
I. THE GERMAN
IDEALISTS
Johann
Gottlieb Fichte
(1762-1814)
Johann G. Fichte (picture)
was born at Rammenau in Upper Lusatia in 1762. He
studied theology at the University of Jena, where,
some years later, he occupied the chair of
philosophy. Dismissed from Jena as a result of a
violent controversy, he lectured at Berlin, where
he became identified with the Romantic Movement. In
1807 and 1808 he delivered in Berlin his famous
"Addresses to the German Nation," which were aimed
at stirring up the patriotic spirit of his
countrymen and enlightening them on the foundations
for national prosperity. Fichte died of typhus in
1814. His masterpiece is Foundation of General
Science.
Doctrine
Fichte abolished the distinction between the
thinking-ego and the "thing in itself." Primordial
reality is one, Pure Ego, which is the root of all
realities. The moments of the Pure Ego are two: (1)
production; (2) reflection. First, by an
unconscious obligation, the Universal Spirit (Pure
Ego) is impelled to produce, that is, to put forth
limited objects. This is the world of nature. By
reflecting upon these limited objects, the Spirit
becomes conscious of itself as a limited object.
The consciousness of the spirit in the limited
object gives origin to the empirical-ego (the
individual ego), in which sensitive and
intellective knowledge are possible. But the task
of the Spirit cannot be fulfilled in limited
objects; hence it is forever impelled to produce
new objects. According to Fichte's theory, Germany,
conscious of its superiority, was to become the
leaders of all nations by fulfilling the destiny of
the Universal Spirit.
In The Radical
Academy
Elsewhere On the
Internet
Friedrich
Wilhelm von
Schelling
(1775-1854)
F.W. von Schelling (picture)
was born at Leonberg, a small town of Wurttemberg.
At the age of sixteen he entered the theological
seminary at Tubingen, where he studied theology,
philosophy and philology. A schoolmate, disciple
and friend of Hegel, he later broke with him and
became one of his most severe opponents. Called to
lecture at Jena in 1798, Schelling had Fichte and
Hegel as colleagues there, and came into close
contact with the Romanticists. From 1803 to 1806
Schelling lectured at Wurzburg. Between 1806 and
1820 he was a member of the Academy of Sciences,
with residence in Munich. Next he went to Erlangen
and lectured there for about six years before
returning to Munich to teach philosophy. Finally he
accepted an invitation to lecture in Berlin, where
he succeeded to the chair Hegel had held.
Schelling's most systematic philosophical works
are: System of Transcendental Idealism and
Exposition of My System.
Doctrine
The primordial reality is the Absolute, which is
conceived of by Schelling as "perfect identity of
Spirit and nature"; this is a Romantic concept.
This perfect identity consists in the fact that
neither one can be separated from the other, but
one can prevail over the other. Thus the prevalence
of nature over the Spirit makes possible the
manifestation of the world of nature.
The Spirit, wandering unconsciously in the world
of nature, becomes conscious and appears as an
empirical ago. Then it is able to reflect on what
was unconsciously produced by itself. Art in its
two moments of inspiration and production gives us
the "model of activity" of the Absolute.
In The Radical
Academy
Friedrich
Schleiermacher
(1768-1834)
Friedrich Schleiermacher (picture),
a German Protestant theologian and philosopher, was
born at Breslau. He was a lecturer and professor at
Halle and Berlin. His most representative works are
Sermons on Religion and The Christian
Faith.
Doctrine
The Absolute is actual reality, the source of
the life of our spirit. In the act of sentiment we
feel ourselves submerged in the Infinite Being and
rooted in Him. Thus we understand the dependence of
the finite upon the infinite; this dependence is
the source of religion. Only religion leads us to
the notion of the infinite as the origin of the
life of the finite.
Schleiermacher fuses Spinozism and idealism in
an attempt to combine pantheism with dualism. God
and the world are one; things and the world have a
relative independence. Yet God and the world are
inseparable. God has never been without a world nor
the world without a God. God is a spaceless and
timeless unity; the world is a spatial-temporal
plurality. The religious feeling illuminates one's
entire life and brings unity into it.
In The Radical
Academy
Elsewhere On The
Internet
Georg
Wilhelm
Friedrich
Hegel
(1770-1831)
Georg W.F. Hegel (picture)
was born in Stuttgart. He studied theology and
philosophy, and at first gave his sympathies to the
philosophy of the Enlightenment and to Kantian
Criticism, only to turn to Romantic historicism and
become attached to Fichte and Schelling. He
lectured in various German universities, and
ultimately at the University of Berlin, where he
exercised great influence.
Hegel's most representative philosophical works
are Phenomenology of Spirit, Logic,
and Encyclopedia of Philosophical Sciences.
German Idealism and modern thought, generally
speaking, reach the greatest heights of immanentism
in the compact dialectic system of Hegel.
Doctrine
The primordial reality is conceived by Hegel as
the "pure indetermined," as "non-being." However,
its perennial activity consists in developing
explicitly what it contains implicitly. The
characteristic principle of this primordial reality
in its development is the "coincidence of
opposites," in the sense that any passage is a
result of some already acquired determination as
related to its opposite. Hence the triad which is
fundamental to Hegel's philosophy:
- Being,
- Non-Being,
- Becoming.
Another characteristic of Hegel's idealism is
rationality: primordial being is essentially
thought, idea. Hence the process of development is
essentially rational.
Logic of the Concrete: The principle of
the coincidence of opposites carries within itself
the negation of Aristotelian logic. For Hegel, the
logic of Aristotle takes into consideration
abstract ideas, which as such are immutable. Hence
Aristotle could establish his logic on the
principle of contradiction. But this logic
misinterprets reality; reality is never immutable;
it is always new, and what makes the new reality is
the coincidence of opposites. By means of this
principle, reality nullifies in itself both
extremes of contradiction, being and non-being.
Hegel calls this new logic "The logic of the
concrete." That of Aristotle he calls formal
logic.
Dialectical Process of Being: The
Universal Spirit objectivates itself with the
intention of gaining consciousness of self. At the
basis of this process is rationality, i.e., a
system of pure concepts according to which the
development will be made. The Spirit objectivates
itself first in "nature," whose pinnacle is the
human organism and individual consciousness. But
the spirit is not satisfied with the limits of
individual consciousness, and is impelled to other
super-individual forms:
- The family, which is the union of
souls;
- The civil society, which is a larger
communion of souls;
- The state, which is the highest revelation
of the spirit, and in which the Spirit finds the
fullness of its freedom -- the state is the
"living God."
As the whole process is supposed to be rational,
in the state all opposites are reconciled. Although
the state is the supreme manifestation of the
spirit, there is another triad regarding the
Absolute Spirit: art, religion and philosophy.
Conclusion
For a decade after Hegel's death, Hegelianism
was the outstanding philosophy of Germany. It
enjoyed patronage of the Prussian State and the
universities. Its logical method was popular.
Hegelianism divides into two groups:
- Conservatives favored the interpretation of
Hegelianism in an orthodox supernatural
theism;
- Liberalism (Young Hegelians) held to a
spiritualistic pantheism; God is the universal
substance which becomes conscious in mankind.
Left wing Hegelians were: Richter, Ruge, Bauer,
Strauss. Some liberals went over to naturalism.
Karl Marx and Lassale (early socialists) based
their economic interpretation of history on
Hegelian premises -- What was once rational
becomes irrational in the evolutionary process
and thus private property, once rational, will
be superseded and overcome in socialism, because
this is the dialectic-logical process of
history.
Hegel's genius in the history of philosophy and
in the history of religion produced a school of
great historians of philosophy including
Trendelenburg, Erdman, Zeller, Kuno Fischer,
Windelband, and Pfleiderer. Hegel's work influenced
the study of history, jurisprudence, politics, and
all the mental sciences.
In The Radical
Academy
Elsewhere On the
Internet
The positive
contributions of the German Idealists to the
Perennial Philosophy
None. Virtually all of German Idealism is
antithetical to Commonsense Philosophical Realism.
Some of the ideas are truly dangerous. For
instance, the Hegelian concept, in which the state
is the living God and individuals are but passing
shadows, and in which, moreover, conflict and war
are affirmations of the vitality of the state, has
been put to the test in the German nation. The
course which Germany followed -- with disastrous
results -- in two world wars is rightly judged the
consequence of such a concept. Ideas do have
consequences! Needless to say Hegel's concept of
reality is immanentist, pantheistic, and
atheistic.
II. THE
CRITICAL REVISION OF IDEALISM
The Hegelian identification of reality with
rationality influenced the entire German culture of
the first half of the nineteenth century, with the
result that facts were distorted so as to fit into
the system. A critical revision was necessary, and
it was undertaken in the name of Kant. The most
important representatives of this critical movement
were Herbert and Schopenhauer.
Every phase of Hegelian philosophy was subjected
to attack: its idealism, its pantheism, its
rationalism, and its a priori methods attracted
criticism. Some thinkers insisted on the refinement
of scientific methods; their approaches resulted in
realism and pluralism. Others insisted that the
irrational elements in reality would have to be
taken into account. Devotees of mysticism,
religion, and intuition sought to expand the
functions of the mind. Reason was not enough.
Johann
Friedrich
Herbart
(1776-1841)
Johann Friedrich Herbart (picture)
was born in Oldenburg. He studied at the University
of Jena and was a disciple of Fichte. He then went
to Berne as a private tutor. From 1802 to 1809 he
lectured at Gottingen, and then went to Konigsberg,
where he occupied the chair formerly held by Kant.
In 1833 he returned to Gottingen as professor of
philosophy, dying there in 1841. The most
representative works of Herbart are:
Introduction to Philosophy, Manual of
Psychology, and General Metaphysics.
Doctrine
Herbart started with experience and tried to
restore the Kantian concept of the thing in itself.
For him, experience shows an irreducible
contradiction between the one and the many.
Indeed,
- While reality is one, experiences shows it
under a multiplicity of opposite qualities;
- While reality is one, change makes it
many;
- The "ego" summarizes the multiplicity of
qualities and change.
To overcome these contradictions, we must
suppose that reality is not uniform, but broken up
into a multitude of parts. These parts have a
relationship to one another, and these
relationships make a plurality of realities. The
human soul is one of many simple and immutable
realities. Its relationship to the others is called
representation. These relationships or
representations obey mechanical laws. The ego as a
person is a solidified group of perceptions. The
moral value of human operations is due to the
existence in man of some "model ideas," such as:
interior freedom; perfection; benevolence; right
and equity.
Influence on Education: Herbart had his
greatest influence on education. Pedagogy is
applied psychology and its ends are determined by
ethics. Herbart's mechanical conception of the
mental life places emphasis on
- Instruction -- to make ideas
influence or determine conduct;
- Interest -- showing instruction can
be made educative;
- The Value of Apperception -- the
restatement of a new content by previously
existing content.
Herbart's aim in education is found in the five
great elements which enter into character: proper
instruction, full knowledge, clear ideas, right
action, personal character.
In The Radical
Academy
Elsewhere On the
Internet
Arthur
Schopenhauer
(1788-1860)
Arthur Schopenhauer (picture)
was born in Danzig, the son of a wealthy merchant.
He had been educated for the business world by his
father, but as soon as his father died Schopenhauer
turned to the study of philosophy. He traveled
extensively in Holland, England, France,
Switzerland, and Italy. He obtained his doctor's
degree at Jena in 1813. A few years later he began
to lecture at Berlin, but his attempts to stem the
tide of Hegel's popularity there were unsuccessful.
He left the University and traveled again in Italy.
In 1833 he retired to Frankfort on the Main, where
he spent the remainder of his life writing his
books in learned retirement. Always hostile to
Idealism and particularly toward Hegelianism, he
died in 1860, when Hegel's philosophy was already
in its decline. Schopenhauer's masterpiece of
philosophical writing is The World as Will and
Idea. He also published Two Fundamental
Problems of Ethics.
Doctrine
The World as Will and Idea. The
primordial reality is blind will, whose
unconscious desire is self-preservation. Hence the
primordial reality is a blind will to live. This
desire accounts for the fact that the will
unconsciously manifests itself in a multiplicity of
natural beings. When the brain of man is
constructed, the will becomes conscious and
knowledge is possible.
Pessimism. The "desire to live" on the
part of the primordial reality is present
everywhere: love, egoism, the progress of
civilization are means for perpetuating the desire
to live. But this desire is caused by blind will;
hence the whole universe is miserable.
Applications of Schopenhauer's Doctrine to
Man. The only remedy against evil is to
suppress the will to live. This can be done by:
- Aesthetics, because the contemplation
of beauty suspends all desires;
- Ethics, whose fundamental
characteristic, for Schopenhauer, is
benevolence;
- Asceticism, which nullifies any
desire for life.
Schopenhauer is of the later German school in
his doctrine of all embracing will, but he is alone
among German philosophers in ascribing to the
efforts of universal will no goal, no good, no
improvement.
In The Radical
Academy
Elsewhere On the
Internet
The positive contributions
of Herbart and Schopenhauer to the Perennial
Philosophy
In a word, none.
The New
Idealism in German Philosophy
With the decline of Hegelianism, natural science
progressed. Philosophy seems to be threatened with
permanent silence. From the natural sciences some
great thinkers appeared who restored philosophic
prestige. Prominent among this group were Lotze,
Fechner, Hartmann, Wundt, and Paulsen. They
generally regarded it futile to construct a
metraphysics by means of rationalistic methods
slone, independent of natural science. They all
hold, with Kant, that there can be no knowledge
without experience. The most outstanding of this
group to do justice to idealism was Lotze
(1817-1881).
Rudolph
Hermann Lotze
(1817-1881)
Lotze (picture)
dealt with the principal problems of his philosophy
three times and each time somewhat differently. At
the age of 24, he published his first
Metaphysics, and two years later, in 1843,
his first Logic. He developed his views on
metaphysics, logic, ethics, and other topics in his
Microcosmos (1856-1864), and wrote a third
Logic (1874) and a third Metaphysics
(1879). Death prevented him from revising his
Ethics and other disquisitions. Although his
Microcosmos was not meant as his last word,
his name remains connected with this work which is
regarded as one of the most important documents of
modern German philosophy, and has influenced many
great thinkers in foreign countries, not least of
all America.
Before the publication of Microcosmos,
Lotze was regarded as a physiologist rather than a
philosopher. He had studied and taught medicine and
physiology, and had become known by his theory of
"local signs," an attempt to establish relations
between sensory affections and areas of the brain,
and even more by his rigorous criticism of the
concept of "vital force," by demonstrating that
physiological processes can and must be explained
by strictly mechanistic terms.
In his first Logic, he protested against
any blending of logic with metaphysics. In his
first Metaphysics he severely criticized
German idealism. Lotze's Microcosmos is of
anthropocentric character, and in this work the
effort to reconcile philosophy and religion,
philosophy and science, knowledge and the needs of
human nature is conspicuous. Maintaining his
conviction of the mutual affection of mind and
body, Lotze proceeds to a monism which he
characterizes as ideological idealism, sometimes as
panpsychism.
The mechanistic interpretation of nature is
considered unavoidable, but Lotze insists that
there are ideal interests, values and duties which
are not to be rejected as phantoms because they
cannot be proved mechanistically, and that psychic
life cannot be compared with external, natural
occurrences. All concepts of the cosmic order are
reduced to a consciousness of truth, facts and
values. Evidently inspired by Malebranche, Lotze
assumes God as the ultimate cause of all events,
all becoming, and the condition of the
possible.
In his third stage, Lotze tried to formulate his
ideas more precisely. He abandoned panpsychism.
Always devoted to modern humanism, Lotze abhorred
the idea of revolution, and did not like
democracy.
In The Radical
Academy
Friedrich
Albert Lange
(1828-1875)
Germany has produced very few philosophers who
are as lucid, judicious and sincere as Lange
(picture), whose
History of Materialism (1866) has maintained
its value as a standard work and an example of
philosophical historiography despite the change of
time and the increase of knowledge.
Lange, a leader of Neo-Kantianism, demonstrated
materialism but, on the other hand, he taught us to
appreciate the materialistic philosophers whose
independence of idealistic traditions has often
obtained sound results and has been directed by
true critical insight. Above all, Lange destroyed
the not uncommon prejudice that the adoption of
idealistic views on metaphysics would guarantee
higher moral standards than could be achieved by
the conduct of life of those who professed
materialism in metaphysics.
Before lange published his history of
materialism, his book Die Arbeiterfrage (The
Workers' Question, 1865) created quite a stir in
German social politics. Lange, a professor at the
University of Marburg, energetically defended the
interests of the workers and their political and
economic demands, and he was eager to improve their
educational and cultural conditions. He often
debated with the earliest leaders of German
socialism, and quite as often supported them,
speaking at meetings arranged by them. Lange
honestly tried to ally German democrats and
socialists. His premature death was mourned by
intellectuals and workers alike.
In The Radical
Academy
Elsewhere On The
Internet
Wilhelm
Windelband
(1848-1915)
As a historian of philosophy and as the founder
of the "South-West-German school of philosophy,"
Windelband (picture)
exercised considerable influence. In both
activities, he emphasized that philosophy must
reflect on civilization and its historical
evolution. Windelband belongs to those German
philosophers who proceed from Kant's criticism, but
he protested against other neo-Kantians who mainly
confined their thinking to a renewal of Kant's
epistemology, and he stressed the importance of his
inquiries into ethics, aesthetics, and philosophy
of law and religion. Windelband's program, however,
maintained that "to understand Kant rightly means
to go beyond him." While Kant considered only
mathematics and natural sciences, founded upon
mathematics, as real sciences, Windelband held that
history in the broadest sense of the word,
comprising views on all kinds of human activities,
must be acknowledged as a true science.
He distinguished between the natural sciences,
which are concerned with the establishment of laws,
and the historical sciences, which try to grasp, to
describe and explain individual facts. The methods
of the natural sciences are characterized as being
of a generalizing, nomothetic character, those of
the historical sciences as "idiographic." From this
distinction, Windelband proceeded to a sharp
opposition to epistemological naturalism, and
broached the question, of whether the nomothetic or
the idiographic sciences are of more essential
importance to philosophy. He decided in favor of
the historical sciences, because, according to him
philosophy must interpret spiritual life and
explain values, and the sense of values is rooted
in the sense of the individual.
In his efforts to "go beyond Kant," Windelband
relied on Hegel, Herbart and Lotze. Closely
associated with Windelband was Heinrich Rickert.
Among Windelband's disciples were not only noted
philosophers but sociologists like Max Weber and
theologians like Ernst Troeltsch.
In The Radical
Academy
To Page
Two of Successors of Kant
Enrich
Your Life With a Philosophy
Book...
|