The only standard we have for
judging all of our social, economic, and political
institutions and arrangements as just or unjust, as
good or bad, as better or worse, derives from our
conception of the good life for man on earth, and
from our conviction that, given certain external
conditions, it is possible for men to make good
lives for themselves by their own efforts.
Mortimer J. Adler
In the middle of the last century, when a
constitutional democracy in this country was still
a hundred years away, Horace Mann wrote: "The
establishment of a republican government without
well-appointed and efficient means for the
universal education of the people is the most rash
and foolhardy experiment ever tried by man."
Every citizen, both young and old, should know
about the ideas and ideals of the Constitution.
By "every citizen" I mean not only the persons
who are of an age to exercise the franchise that
enables them to participate actively in political
life. I include also those individuals who will
become our future citizens -- the young, who, when
they come of age, will take on the responsibilities
that the high office of citizenship puts on their
shoulders.
Most Americans, I fear, do not know or
appreciate the fact that citizenship is the primary
political office under a constitutional government.
In a republic, the citizens are the ruling class.
They are the permanent and principal rulers. All
other offices that are set up by the constitution
are secondary.
The first and indispensable qualification for
holding political office in any of the branches of
government is to be a citizen. Officeholders,
moreover, whether elected or selected, are citizens
in office for a period of time, but all citizens
are citizens for life. Officeholders, from the
President down, are transient and instrumental
rulers, unlike citizens in general who are
permanent and principal rulers.
The distinction between the permanent status of
citizenship and the transient or temporary
character of government officials is obvious. But
it may not be so obvious why I refer to citizens as
the principal and call government officials
instrumental rulers. To understand this point it is
necessary to realize that the government of the
United States is not in Washington, not in the
White House, not in the Capitol, which houses the
Congress, nor in any or all the public office
buildings in the District of Columbia.
The government of the United States resides in
us -- we, the people. What resides in Washington is
the administration of our government. We recognize
this, at least verbally, when we say, after a
Presidential election, that we have changed one
administration for another. That change leaves the
government of the United States unchanged, because
its principal rulers are also its permanent rulers,
whereas its instrumental rulers, its administrative
officials -- are transient and temporary.
Administrative officials, from the President
down, are the instruments by which we, the people,
govern ourselves. They serve us in our capacity as
self-governing citizens of the Republic. Lincoln
never tired of saying that he conceived his role to
be that of a servant of the people who elected him.
The word "servant" in this connection does not
carry any invidious connotations of inferiority or
menial status. Rather, it signifies the performance
of an important function, one carrying great
responsibility, a responsibility officials are
called upon to discharge while they are serving a
term in public office.
I am sorry to say that most Americans think of
themselves as the subjects of government and regard
the administrators in public office as their
rulers, instead of thinking of themselves as the
ruling class and public officials as their servants
-- the instrumentalities for carrying out their
will.
It is of the utmost importance to persuade the
citizens of the United States, both young and old,
that they have misconceived their role in the
political life of this country. If they can be
persuaded to overcome this misconception, and come
to view themselves in the right light, they will
understand that their high responsibility as
citizens carries with it the obligation to
understand the ideas and ideals of our
constitutional government.
In earlier times, when much smaller societies
than ours were ruled by princes, books were written
to instruct princes in the art of governance. The
education of the prince, both moral and
intellectual, was of supreme importance if one had
any expectation of obtaining good government from
their benevolently despotic rule.
Now, when the people have replaced the prince,
when they are the self-governing rulers of the
Republic, how can we expect good government from
them, or from the administrative officials whom
they directly or indirectly choose to serve them,
unless we think it supremely important that they,
the citizens both young and old, be educated for
the discharge of their responsibilities.
Preparation for the duties of citizenship is one
of the objectives of any sound system of public
schooling in our society. Our present system of
compulsory basic schooling, kindergarten through
the twelfth grade, does not serve any of these
objectives well.
The reasons why this is so and what must be done
to remedy these grave deficiencies have been set
forth in a series of my books ("Reforming
Education: The Opening of the American Mind", "We
Hold These Truths", and "The Paideia Proposal")
that have initiated much needed reforms in our
school system. Here I will borrow from them only
what is germane to the explanation of what must be
accomplished educationally to make the future
citizens of the United States better citizens than
their elders.
I am going to state the educational objective in
its minimal terms. The least to be expected of our
future citizens (as well as all the rest of us) is
that they will have to read the three documents
that are our political testament -- the Declaration
of Independence, the Constitution of the United
States, and Lincoln's Gettysburg Address -- and
that their reading of these three documents will
have eventuated in their understanding the ideas
and ideals of our Republic. While much more might
be added, the primary concern here is the
understanding of the ideas and ideals of the
Constitution.
I have engaged in the Paideia project to reform
basic schooling in the United States. In the course
of doing so I have had the occasion to conduct many
seminars with high school students in which the
reading assigned for discussion was the Declaration
of Independence. Taking part in the seminar
resulted in their reading that document for the
first time.
The discussions that followed revealed how
little they understood the meaning of the
Declaration's principal terms before the discussion
began, and how much more remained to be done after
the seminar was over to bring them to a level of
understanding that, in my judgment, is the minimal
requisite for intelligent citizenship in this
country. The same can also be said with regard to
the Constitution and the Gettysburg Address.
I am sure that the sampling of high school
students I met in these seminars is representative
of the general state of mind, and that a similar
sampling of our college graduates would not change
the picture.
Over the last fifty years, I have also conducted
executive seminars under the auspices of the Aspen
Institute for Humanistic Studies, in which the
participants are graduates of our best colleges and
universities and have reached positions of eminence
in our society -- the top echelons in industry,
commercial establishments, journalism, the
so-called learned professions, and government.
Their understanding of the basic ideas in the
Declaration and in the Preamble to the Constitution
is not discernibly better than what I found among
high school students.
On one very special occasion, I conducted a
discussion of the Declaration with leading members
of President John F. Kennedy's Cabinet and his
political entourage. To my surprise and chagrin,
the result was the same.
The inevitable conclusion that I draw from all
of these experiences is that there is work for us
to do. I am fully aware that I cannot hope we will
succeed in achieving what we seek to do -- to help
every citizen, both young and old, understand the
ideas and ideals of the Constitution.
Considering the extent of actual and functional
illiteracy in this country, even that may be too
much to hope for at the present time. Still, one
must believe that reform of basic schooling will
succeed in the years that lie ahead and that, at
some future time, an understanding of the
fundamental principles that underlie the political
life of this Republic will be the possession of
every citizen of the United States.
Our schools are not turning out young people
prepared for the high office and the duties of
citizenship in a democratic republic. Our political
institutions cannot thrive, they may not even
survive, if we do not produce a greater number of
thinking citizens, from whom some statesmen of the
type we had in the eighteenth century might
eventually emerge. We are, indeed, a nation at
risk, and nothing but radical reform of our schools
can save us from impending disaster.
Whatever the price we must pay in money and
effort to do this, the price we will pay for not
doing it will be much greater.