|
From the
pen of Dr. Mortimer J. Adler
Great
Ideas from the Great Books
[This is a series of questions and answers.
The questions, coming as they do from newspaper
readers all over the country, demonstrate a
widespread interest in the great ideas. More
specifically, they express the desire of our
fellow-citizens to learn what the wisdom of the
past can teach us about the problems we all face in
the twentieth century. They do not ask for the
solution of these problems -- for the one right
answer -- but only for the clarification and
illumination of these problems which can be drawn
from the great writers in our Western tradition --
the authors of the books that have contributed most
to the development of our culture.
Dr. Adler has tried for the most part to
summarize the insights and wisdom which can be
found in the great books. In many cases, it has
been necessary to report conflicting theories of
the matter under consideration, for on the
important questions with which we are here
concerned the great minds of the past are seldom of
one opinion. But where they differ, they also help
us to think more deeply about the problem at hand.
They present us with the basic alternatives that we
must consider in order to make an Intelligent
decision as to where we ourselves stand on the
issue.]
Index:
More will be published as they become
available.
WHAT
IS TRUTH?
Dear Dr. Adler,
I find it hard to define what truth is. Some
of my friends say that truth is what most people
think is so. But that does not make sense to me,
because sometimes the majority is wrong. Even what
everyone thinks is so may not be the truth. There
must be some better definition of truth. What is
it?
A. N.
Dear A. N.,
You are quite right to feel dissatisfied. Your
friends did not arrive at a definition of truth,
but at one of the signs of truth. In certain cases
the fact that the majority holds something to be
true is an indication that it is probably true. But
this is only one of the signs of truth, and by no
means the best one. And it does not answer your
question or Pilate's -- "What is truth?"
It may help you to understand the nature of
truth to consider what is involved in telling a
lie. If a man tells a woman "I love you" when he
does not, he is telling a lie. When a child who has
raided the cookie jar tells his mother "I didn't,"
he is lying. Lying consists in saying the opposite
of what you know, think, or feel. It is distinct
from honest error, such as that of the umpire who
calls a man "out" when he is "safe," or vice
versa.
Josiah Royce, a great American philosopher at
the beginning of this century, defined a liar as a
man who willfully misplaces his ontological
predicates; that is, a man who says "is" when he
means "is not," or "is not" when he means "is."
Royce's definition of a liar leads us quickly to
the most famous of all philosophical definitions of
truth. It was given by Plato and Aristotle almost
twenty-five centuries ago; it has been repeated in
various ways ever since, and seldom been improved
upon.
Plato and Aristotle say that the opinions we
hold are true when they assert that that which is,
is, or that that which is not, is not; and that our
opinions are false when they assert that that which
is, is not, or that that which is not, is.
When the "is" in a statement we make agrees with
the way things are, then our statement is true, and
its truth consists in its corresponding to the
existent facts of nature and reality. When we think
that something exists or has happened which does
not exist or did not happen, then we are mistaken
and what we think is false.
So, as you see, truth is very easy to define,
and the definition is not very hard to understand.
Perhaps impatient Pilate would have waited for the
answer if he had known that it could be given so
briefly. But maybe he was thinking of another
question, "How can we tell whether a statement is
true or false?" This, by the way, is the question
you and your friends ended up by answering.
To this question there are three main types of
answer. The first insists that some statements are
self-evidently true, such as, "The whole is greater
than the part." Such statements reveal their truth
to us directly by the fact that we find it
impossible to think the opposite of them. When we
understand what a whole is and what a part is, we
cannot think that a part is greater than the
whole to which it belongs. That is how we know
immediately the truth of the statement that the
whole is greater than any of its parts.
Another type of answer says that the truth of
statements can be tested by our experience or
observations. If a man says that it did not rain in
Chicago a single day last month, we can check the
truth of his statement by looking up the official
weather records. Or we can stick a foot into a
swimming pool to see if the water is as warm as a
friend says it is. Similarly, a scientific
generalization is considered true only as long as
no contrary facts are observed.
The third type of answer has to do with
statements that are neither self-evidently true nor
capable of being checked by direct appeal to
observed facts. It may be a question of a person's
character, what type of product is most desirable
for certain purposes, or whether the favorite will
win the next race. Here it is permissible to count
noses and to find the consensus of a group of
people or of the experts. That an opinion is held
by a majority can be taken as a sign that it has
some probability of being true.
This third answer was the one your friend
arrived at. But the fact that it expressed the
consensus of the group does not make it the right
answer to the question, "What is truth?" Nor does
it give the full answer to the question, "How can
we tell whether a statement is true? Defining truth
is easy; knowing whether a particular statement is
true is much harder; and pursuing the truth is most
difficult of all.
--
Next Page --
Enrich
Your Life With a Philosophy Book...
Enrich
Your Life With a Philosophy
Magazine...
Academy
Showcase
Specials
|
|
|
|
|
|