|
Hard
Reading Made Easy
By Mortimer J. Adler, Ph.D.
Traveling around the country I find that more
and more people have an urge to pry into such
difficult subjects as science, philosophy,
religion, economics and political theory. One clear
sign of this is the widespread circulation of the
serious books that are now found everywhere in
paper-back editions. Decidedly, people want to go
further and deeper in their thinking about many
things which we used to feel were the monopoly of
specialists and scholars.
More often than not, however, this urge soon
dries up. People find that the book which they open
with high hopes of enlightenment turns out to be
beyond their grasp. They think that the subject
must require more background than they have, and
they quit.
Actually, any book intended for the general
reader can be understood if you approach it in the
right way. What is the right approach? The answer
lies in one important -- and paradoxical -- rule of
reading. You should read a book through
superficially before you try to master it.
Most of us were taught in school to go to a
dictionary when we met an unfamiliar word. We were
told to consult an encyclopedia, scholarly
commentaries or other secondary sources to get help
with statements we couldn't understand. The rule to
follow on tackling a difficult book calls for
exactly the opposite procedure.
Look first for the things you can understand,
and refuse to get bogged down in the difficult
passages. Read right on past paragraphs, footnotes,
arguments and references that escape you. There
will be enough material which you can immediately
grasp, and soon it will add up to a substantial
foothold from which to climb further. The amount
you understand by a quick reading -- even if it is
only 50 percent or less -- will help you to carry
some light back to the places which left you in the
dark.
The tremendous pleasure that comes from reading
Shakespeare was spoiled for generations of high
school students who were forced to go through
Julius Caesar, Hamlet or Macbeth
scene by scene, to look up all the new words and to
study all the scholarly footnotes. As a result,
they never really read the play. By the time
they got to the end they had forgotten the
beginning and lost sight of the whole. Instead of
being forced to take this pedantic approach, they
should have been encouraged to read the play in one
sitting and discuss what they got out of that first
quick reading. Then they would have been ready to
study the play carefully, for they would have
understood enough of it to be able to learn
more.
The best proof of the soundness of this rule --
give a book a first superficial reading -- is what
happens when you don't follow it. Take a basic work
in economics such as Adam Smith's The Wealth
of Nations. If you insist on understanding
everything on one page before you go on to the next
you won't get very far. In your effort to master
the fine points, you will miss the big points that
Smith so clearly makes -- about the role of the
market in determining prices, the evils of
monopoly, the reasons for free trade.
What is true of The Wealth of Nations in
the field of economics is equally true of J. S.
Mill's Representative Government in the
field of political theory. These books are open to
the layman if he approaches them in the right way;
so also are a host of other books. In religion, the
writings of Martin Buber, Reinhold Niebuhr and Paul
Tillich; in philosophy and psychology, the writings
of William James, Sigmund Freud, John Dewey,
Bertrand Russell; in science, the works of Galileo,
Newton, Darwin, Einstein. The writings of such
specialists are probably not completely
understandable by the layman, nor need they be. It
is a considerable achievement if we can grasp. The
essential part of what these great men are saying,
about their principles, their methods and their
aims.
In addition, it is well to remember that books
can be not only good friends, but also passing
acquaintances. Some of them can tell us what we
want to know -- or all they have to tell -- from a
brief chat, if we use them properly.
A variation on the method of giving a book a
first superficial reading is the technique of
skimming. You will never get from skimming what
reading and study can give you, but it is a very
practical way of dealing with the mass of books
available to you. By skimming you can get, often
with surprising accuracy, a general sense of the
contents of a book. This enables you to file the
book away in your mental index so that, should
occasion arise in the future, you can go back to
it, dig it up and dig deeper.
Giving a book a quick once-over is also a
threshing process that allows you to separate the
chaff from the real kernels of nourishment. You may
discover that what you get from the skimming is all
the book is worth to you for the time being. It may
never be worth more. But you will then at least
know what the author's leading contention is, so
the time you spent with the book will not have been
wasted.
For skimming or reading, the following steps are
a good way to begin giving a book the
once-over:
- (1) Look at the title page and preface, and
note especially the
- subtitle -- or other indications of the
scope and aim of the book
- or the author's special angle.
-
- (2) Study the table of contents to get a
general sense of the
- book's structure; use it as you would a road
map before taking
- a trip.
-
- (3) Check the index for the range of
subjects covered or the
- kinds of authors quoted. When you see terms
listed that seem
- crucial, look up the passage. You may find
the key to the
- author's approach.
Now you are ready to read the book or skim
through it, as you choose. If you vote to skim it,
look at the chapters which contain pivotal passages
or summary statements in their opening or closing
pages. Then dip into a page here and there, reading
a paragraph or two, sometimes several pages in
sequence. Thumb through the book in this way,
always looking for the basic pulse beat of the
matter.
All this will add to your alertness while you
read. How many times have you daydreamed through
pages only to wake up to find that you have no idea
of the ground you've been over? That cannot happen
if you have a system for following a general
thread.
One word of warning: if you use this approach
and start to skim through a book, you may end up
discovering that you aren't skimming it at all. You
are reading it, understanding it and enjoying it.
When you put the book down it will be with the
realization that the subject wasn't such a tough
one after all!
Published in Reader's
Digest (December, 1958, pgs 81-83): Condensed
from Mayfair (November, 1958)
Enrich
Your Life With a Philosophy Book...
Enrich
Your Life With a Philosophy
Magazine...
Academy
Showcase
Specials
|
|
|
|
|
|