|
General
Education vs. Vocational Education
by Mortimer J. Adler, Ph.D.
In the opinion of the ancients, education is the
process of developing or perfecting human beings.
It tries to cultivate the humanity of man by
developing his specifically human excellences --
both intellectual and moral. The ultimate goals of
education are human happiness and the welfare of
society. Its products are good men and good
citizens.
If the ancients were asked whether education
should be specialized,they would answer that it
should be specialized only in that it should be
conceived in terms of man's specifically human
nature. If they were asked whether it should be
vocational, they would say that the only vocation
with which it should be concerned is the common
human calling -- the pursuit of happiness. What we
call specialized and vocational training --
training for particular jobs -- they would regard
as the training of slaves, not the education of
free men.
This classical view of education has prevailed
right down to our own century. It is reaffirmed as
late as 1916 by none other than John Dewey. In
Democracy and Education, Dewey declares that merely
vocational training is the training of animals or
slaves. It fits them to become cogs in the
industrial machine. Free men need liberal education
to prepare them to make a good use of their
freedom.
Writing in 1776, at the beginning of the
industrial revolution, the English economist Adam
Smith advocates a minimum general education for all
citizens. He points out that a man who is incapable
of using his intellectual faculties properly is not
fully human. He describes the stultification of the
worker from whom no real craftsmanship or skill is
demanded. The division of labor, which limits him
to performing a few simple operations, makes him a
mere appendage of the industrial process.
As a result, the worker, according to Adam
Smith, "becomes as stupid and ignorant as it is
possible for a human being to become. The torpor of
his mind renders him not only incapable of
relishing or bearing a part m any rational
conversation, but of conceiving any generous,
noble, or tender sentiment, and consequently of
forming any moral judgment concerning many of the
ordinary duties of private life."
Adam Smith's picture may be unduly grim, and
more applicable to the eighteenth than to the
twentieth century. But the essential truth it
points out remains unchanged. Specialized
vocational training which does no more than fit a
man for a limited task in the industrial process is
as stultifying as the job itself. Such training is,
strictly speaking, not education in the human sense
at all. It contributes to the production of
material goods, not to the development of human
beings.
While the ancients had the correct view of
education as essentially liberal, they did not
think that all men should be liberally educated,
because they did not think that all men are fitted
by nature for the pursuit of happiness or
citizenship or the liberal pursuits of leisure. But
we today, at least those of us who are devoted to
the principles of democracy, think otherwise. We
maintain that all men should be citizens, that all
have an equal right to the pursuit of happiness,
and that all should be able to enjoy the goods of
civilization. Hence we think that a democratic
society must provide liberal schooling for all.
Vocational training for particular tasks in the
industrial process should be done by industry
itself and on the job, not by the schools or in
classrooms. The curriculum of basic schooling, from
the first grade through college, should be wholly
liberal and essentially the same for all. In view
of the wide range of abilities and aptitudes with
which the schools have to deal, that curriculum
must be adapted to different children in different
ways.
In other words, we must solve the problem of how
to give all the children -- the least gifted as
well as the most gifted -- the same kind of liberal
education that was given in the past only to the
few. Upon our success in solving that problem the
future of democracy depends.
Enrich
Your Life With a Philosophy Book...
Enrich
Your Life With a Philosophy
Magazine...
Academy
Showcase
Specials
|
|
|
|
|
|