|
RECENT
AMERICAN THOUGHT - 2
Thorstein
Veblen
(1857-1929)
Thorstein Bunde Veblen (picture)
was born in Valders, Wisconsin on July 30, 1857. He
is best known for his book The Theory of The
Leisure Class (1899), a classic of social
theory that introduced the concept of "conspicuous
consumption." Veblen received a Ph.D. from Yale in
1884 and taught at the University of Chicago,
Stanford University, the University of Wisconsin,
and the New School for Social Research. Before
Veblen turned to the study of social and economic
facts and theories, he had concentrated upon
philosophy, especially the works of Kant, Comte and
Spencer, and, in his later years, the problems of
economics remained closely connected in Veblen's
mind with fundamental problems of life,
civilization and the general theory of science.
Intending to integrate political economy into
the general movement of science, Veblen discussed
the evolution of the scientific point of view, the
place of science within the framework of
civilization, and the function of evolution within
political economy. Although Veblen was strongly
impressed by the doctrine of evolution, he was
opposed to the simple application of the
evolutionary principles to the study of social
phenomena. He was also strongly opposed to
positivism, and relied more upon German idealism
and romanticism. He sometimes flirted with
theorists of racialism like Gobineau and H.S.
Chamberlin, and, if not influenced by Georges
Sorel, he came in his own way very close to the
latter's standpoint. Both Sorel and Veblen were
inspired by Marx and criticised him by similar
arguments. Both were enthusiasts of the idea of
promoting industrial production by social political
changes. Also, both considered the capitalist unfit
to achieve technical progress and they advocated
recruitment of industrial leaders from the classes
of salaried technicians and workers.
Veblen argued that a fundamental conflict exists
between the making of goods and the making of
money. In The Theory of Business Enterprise
(1904), he argued that the entrepreneur is a
reactionary predator whose perspective is
diametrically opposed to that of the engineer or
industrialist. Veblen's businessperson makes
profits not by providing an outlet for the forces
of industrialization and social evolution but by
distorting them: by engaging in monetary
manipulations, by restricting output to keep prices
artificially high, and by interfering with the
engineers who actually produce goods and services.
The founder of the so-called institutionalist
school, Veblen believed that economics must not be
studied as a closed system but rather as an aspect
of a culture whose customs and habits constitute
institutions that are rapidly changing.
Veblen's violent attacks on the business class
and its ideology have caused violent controversies
in America. In Europe Veblen remained nearly
unknown. Brought up in a clannish community of
immigrants from Norway, Veblen never became
completely at ease with the American way of living.
He had no talent for teaching, and his academic
career was hampered by the troubles of his private
life. But his writing, especially his first and
principal book Theory of the Leisure Class,
had a fermenting effect on economic and social
thinking in America. Thorstein Veblen died on
August 3, 1929.
In The Radical
Academy
Elsewhere On the
Internet
George
Herbert Mead
(1863-1931)
George Herbert Mead (picture)
was born in South Hadley, Massachusetts on February
27, 1863. He was an important philosopher within
the movement of American pragmatism. He received
his B.A. from Oberlin College in 1883 and began
graduate work in philosophy at Harvard in 1887,
graduating in 1888. While at Harvard he studied
under the philosophers Josiah Royce and William
James.
In 1891 Mead married and the same year began
teaching at the University of Michigan, where he
was a close friend of John Dewey. In 1894 he moved,
with Dewey, to the University of Chicago, where he
eventually became chairman of the philosophy
department.
Mead was greatly influenced by Darwinism, but he
challenged many of the ideas of the crude
behaviorism to which it led. Writing extensively on
the theory of time and the nature of reality, he
developed a view of emergence and novelty in
natural processes. His social psychology,
especially his theory of the self, has had a great
influence on subsequent psychologists and social
scientists. He published relatively little during
his lifetime, and large segments of his books are
collections from his unfinished manuscripts and his
students' notes.
Mead published little during his lifetime, and
wrote no systematic work, but he was a consistnt
thinker. He constantly expressed antipathy for
metaphysics and was equally opposed to idealism and
materialism. His principal interests were devoted
to the investigation of the consequence of
biological theories to scientific psychology. He
held that psychological phenomena, including those
of thinking and knowing, must be described as
actions or reactions of the organism that lives in
an environment and regulates its relations to
objective conditions of life by means of the
nervous system of which the brain is a part.
To Mead, psychical is the state which occurs
when previously formed relations of the organism to
its environment break down and new ones are not yet
built up. Acts are the unity of existence of the
indidivual that is proclaimed as a concrete,
inimitable, nonrationalizable unit, but modifiable
through its relation to society. Mead tried to
maintain a balance between the determination by the
individual of the whole, be it society or the
world, and the determination by the whole of the
individual.
After Mead's death, one of his graduate students
declared that for many years to come articles and
even books would continute to be puslished of which
the first author was George Mead. John Dewey, his
intimate friend, has said that Mead had "a seminal
mind of the first order," and Alfred Whitehead,
after reading some of Mead's posthumously published
books, publicly endorsed this view. Dewey also
recognized that Mead, whose scholarship in the
natural sciences was superior to his own, had
influenced him by conversations which were
continued over a period of years. He died on April
26, 1931.
In The Radical
Academy
Mary
Whiton Calkins
(1863-1930)
Mary Whiton Calkins (picture)
was born in Hartford, Connecticut on March 30,
1863. She was an early leader of American
psychology. While teaching Greek at Wellesley
College, she studied psychology and philosophy at
Harvard University, but at that time Harvard would
not confer a doctorate upon a woman. Calkins
introduced the "paired-associates task" -- a
subject, when presented with a stimulus, is asked
to provide the appropriate response -- which became
a standard tool for studying human learning, and in
1891 she established one of the earliest psychology
laboratories in the country at Wellesley. She was
elected president of the American Psychological
Association in 1905 and of the American
Philosophical Association in 1918.
The creed of Calkins is expressed in four
principal statements which are developed in her
books: The Persistent Problems of Philosophy
(1907) and The Good Man and The Good
(1918). She proceeded from the conviction that
the universe contained distinct mental relities;
that although the mind had emerged from a lower
level of existence, it no longer belonged to that
level, but rather to a new order of existence which
had special laws of behavior. These mental
realities were ultimately personal; consciousness
never occurred impersonally. She defined psychology
as a "science of the self as conscious."
She also asserted that the universe was
throughout mental; that whatever was real was
ultimately mental and therefore personal. She
concluded that the universe was an all-inclusive
Self; an absolute Person; a conscious being. She
maintained that philosophy meant metaphysics, which
she defined as "the attempt by reasoning to know
what is ultimately real." To her, metaphysics did
not imply a return to animism, and she stated that
it was compatible with the concepts of scientific
laws and that reasoning separated metaphysics from
mysticism. She was considerably influenced by
Royce; opposed logical atomism and instrumentalism.
On several problems, she agreed with Samuel
Alexander, but claimed a greater consistency.
Mary Whiton Calkins died on February 27,
1930.
In The Radical
Academy
Elsewhere On the
Internet
Ferdinand
Canning Scott
Schiller
(1864-1937)
In strong opposition to the Hegelianism
prevailing at Oxford University since T.H. Green
and strengthened by F.H. Bradley, another professor
of that same University, though a namesake of the
German idealistic poet Schiller, combated any
idealism of German provenience. F.C.S. Schiller
(picture) called his
philosophy Humanism, while calling himself a
disciple of the sophist Protagoras, who said that
man is the measure of all things.
Schiller proceeds from the statement that all
mental life is purposive to the establishment of a
concept of truth whose criteria are given by the
consequences of a proposition. This does not mean
that truth corresponds to the organic or
sentimental needs of the knower. As Schiller says,
his humanism is merely the perception that the
philosophic problem concerns human beings striving
to comprehend a world of human experiences by the
resources of the human mind.
He distinguishes humanism from pragmatism, to
which it is in fact akin, by the claim that
humanism is of larger range and is able to be
applied not only to logic but to ethics,
aesthetics, metaphysic and theology, and
furthermore by his readiness to acknowledge as many
metaphysics as there are tempers, while rejecting
any absolute metaphysic.
Schiller's principal works about humanism are
Humanism (1903) and Studies in
Humanism (1907). He wrote also about the
problems of the day. In one of his pamphlets he
declared that a government of the world
administered by international bankers would by no
means be the worst possible.
In The Radical
Academy
Elsewhere On The
Internet
To Page 3 of Recent
American Thought
Enrich
Your Life With a Philosophy Book...
Enrich
Your Life With a Philosophy
Magazine...
|