|
Promethean
Challenge to Religion
by William Pepperell
Montague
The moral ideal of Christian love is like a
pillar of flaming light extending from earth to
heaven, but the supernatural religion of freedom,
solace, and joy that should have evolved from it
was choked and poisoned. The successors of Christ,
from St. Paul down to the censors, obscurantists,
and tyrants of today have done their conscientious
worst to hid the light from men. The long series of
authoritarians and ascetics have changed the clear
into the obscure, the beautiful into the ugly, and
with what was most gentle and generous they have
associated what was most cruel and mean. They have
debauched a religion of liberty, service,
tolerance, and progress to their own base ends of
persecution, reaction, and gloom.
Through all the world today there is an ominous
muttering. Not only the small though growing army
of scientists who view the efforts of religious
fanatics to check the teachings of science with a
contempt so deep and cold that they can hardly be
brought to express it, and not only the men of
letters and liberal authors who show a more voluble
contempt for the spirit of censorious puritanism
which is growing beyond the stage of an ugly
American joke are significant; but far more
meaningful than these is the sullen rage of the
multitude of workers throughout the world who for
the first time are really coming to hate the
Christian scheme.
If religion is to be saved from destruction from
without, it must be revolutionized from within. And
it is a Promethean revolution that is needed: no
new prophet as substitute for Christ, but a great
purging and cleansing of Christianity and of all
religion as it exists today.
What would a Prometheanized religion be like?
Would there be left of Christianity, for example,
anything more than a vague and worldly
humanitarianism, a platitudinous philanthropy
touched with inarticulate emotion? Many liberal and
well-meaning people so believe, and, though aware
of the anomalies of orthodoxy and of the growing
dangers to the whole structure of religion, they
fear that any breach in the ranks of authority
would be more dangerous still. I think such fears
are completely ungrounded, and by way of conclusion
I will attempt to outline some of the principal
characteristics of a religion transfigured by a
Promethean revolution.
First of all, there would be the welcome and
luminous absence of sacrosanct authority. Such
dogmas as remained, and they would be many, would
be transformed into hypothesis. The most fantastic
theory of the supernatural, if held as a
hypothesis, is honorable, and belief in it is
honest and to be respected. There would be no lack
of propaganda and missionary zeal. Those who had
faith in a theory would be proud to have it
vindicated by criticism. For the irreligious
freethinking would be optional, but for the
religionists it would be compulsory. A church
member who refused to allow his belief to be tested
in the light of reason would be expelled as one of
little faith. The various schools and sects would
not persecute one another, for why should one
seeker for truth hate another? Why should he not
rather cooperate with him the better to realize
their common end? If a theory is not true, no one
would wish it to survive; it it is true, it will
survive. How senseless and perverse not to test
it!
Not only would theists cease to hate another --
they would cease to hate atheists. They would love
and respect them. For if you are walking
comfortably in the light of a supernatural faith
that the universe is on your side, why should you
not love and respect the man who walks in darkness,
crippled by the feat that the things we care for
most are at the mercy of blind force -- deprived of
your hope of God and another world, yet fighting
bravely by your side for the same ideals for which
you fight? A strange inversion of Christian charity
to hate such a one.
And in this Promethean religion, heaven would be
no less free than earth of the hateful spirit of
monarchical authority. We should not love goodness
because it is commanded by God, but should love God
because He is good. We should base our religion on
our ethics; not as now, our ethics on a
supernatural physics. And there would be no longer
that curious double standard, according to which
the same God who commands us to forgive our enemies
no matter how many times they offend, reserves for
Himself the right to wreak infinite vengeance on
His enemies after one trial life on earth. That
nightmare monster of authoritarian religion,
veritable anti-Christ, would have been consigned to
his own hell, the single one of all imagined beings
who would really deserve it.
As in our religion, so in our ethics. The
principle of authority would be gone, and with it
the great clutter of prohibitions and taboos --
rules taken as ends in themselves rather than as
means to happiness. The one supreme and single
purpose of morality would be the making of life
more abundant, which means the developing to a
maximum the potentialities of every creature. Love
and work by all for the maximum well-being of all.
All moral rules -- the oldest and most revered,
like those established for marriage and property,
no less than the newest and queerest proposals --
would be appraised without prejudice and in the
cold light of intelligence, to be accepted or
rejected only according to their efficiency in
promoting the ideal of freer and more abundant
living.
The banishment of asceticism and
authoritarianism would for the first time in
history bring human ethics into active partnership
with human science. Once clear away the
morality of taboos, and all the forces of
intelligence could be mobilized in the service of
progress, and the vast energies of thought and will
that have wasted in religious wars could be
utilized for moral and religious work.
Excerpted from The Ways of
Things, by William Pepperell
Montague
|
|