Homepage
Newsletter
Search
Updates
About
Adler
Dolhenty
Adventures
Philosophers
Critiques
Glossary
Quotations
Mini-courses
Aquinas
Essays
Philosophy
Politics
Religion
Education
Science
Media
FAQ
Ask
Guestbook
Forum
Bookstore
Emporium
Newsstand
Calendar
Subscribe
Feedback
Tell a friend
Votecaster
Cartoons

BOOKSTORE

Books by Tibor Machan

The Academy Bookstore Main Page
The Academy's Powell's Bookstore

Better Living Resource Center
Business & Finance Resource Center

Search Amazon

Search:

Keywords:

In Association with Amazon.com

Search Powell's



Find books by and about Tibor Machan at Powell's Books.
CLICK HERE to read Dr. Machan's essay "On the Social Contract," in The Radical Academy Politics Resource Center. Other essays by Dr. Machan are listed in the Tibor Machan Archive.

Objectivity Anyone?

The question of objectivity is whether human beings are capable of knowing reality just as it is, or whether there is some necessary distortion in our grasp of the nature of things imposed either by the very nature of our cognitive mechanism, or by such factors as language, culture, personal ambitions, psychological disorders, and class interests. Could it be that we do not see the world at all, since we see it from a particular point of view? Can we ever satisfactorily establish that our understanding of reality is accurate, or must that always remain in doubt? 

In this book Professor Machan defends objectivity in philosophy, science, and everyday life from its many critics. Objectivity stands in need of a defence because it is a difficult ideal to serve, especially in an era of multiculturalism, deconstructionism, feminism, and diversity. People from different cultures report having radically different experiences, indeed radically different worlds. They usually claim that their experiences are as true as anyone else's. Deconstructionists tell us that we know nothing determinate beyond language, i.e., that we don't know what we are talking about. Feminists often maintain that women and men see the world in significantly different ways. The idea of diversity gains much of its plausibility from the idea that people from diverse backgrounds all have their own valid ways of seeing the world. 

The most prominent movements in Anglo-American and continental philosophy are against objectivity. Such figures as Richard Rorty and Jacques Derrida unambiguously deny that human beings are capable of knowing the world as it is. This book considers and responds to these and similar challenges to objectivity.

Objectivity: Recovering Determinate Reality in Philosophy, Science, and Everyday Life, by Tibor R. Machan


A Memoir

The Man Without a Hobby is the memoir of Tibor Machan, a first generation refugee who escaped both a political and a personal tyranny early in his life and embarked upon a search for an understanding of what it means to live freely and wisely. The book is a record of the main events and some interesting tidbits of his life. Detailed are Professor Machan's reflections, interpretations, and lamentations of his riskiest judgments and noteworthy achievements.

You might also enjoy...


The Virtue Of Generosity Flourishes Most In A Free Society

The virtue of generosity is a spontaneous, though rationally cultivated, disposition of persons to extend their help to others who can use and deserve it. As with other virtues, generosity presupposes that persons can make free choices as to how they will act. Its full flourishing in a community requires, furthermore, that the rights to liberty of action are fully respected and protected. Contending, as some do, that generous conduct may be elicited by coercive measures or prohibitions laid down against trade -- e.g., so as to encourage blood donations -- is wrongheaded. Coerced "generosity" is not virtuous and removing the option to trade also does violence to the conditions required for virtous generosity. In their eagerness to provide for the needy, some thinkers make public policy proposals that destory the human capacity for virtous generosity. Only if men and women are left free -- that is, if they live in civil society -- can they be expected to act as they should, including generously, when that is appropriate. The Author


Ethics Presupposes Individual Responsibility

An aspect of this book that's distinctive is that it takes seriously the view that "ought implies can" or if one is ethically responsible to do something, one must have the capacity to initiate one's conduct. The criminal law and common sense embrace this but there is much dispute about it, as well, in our culture wherein so often people disclaim the capacity to make their own choices as to what they do. The book also covers ethical theories, problems of justifying ethical claims, some political and social theories and certain well known issues regarding which there is much debate - abortion, gambling, sexual offensiveness, etc. The Author




-- Top of Page --

[Homepage] [Newsletter] [Search] [Support the Academy] [Link to Us] [Contact the Academy] [Citing Articles from Our Website] [Privacy Policy & Disclaimer]

Copyright 1998-99, 2000-01, & 2002-03 by The Radical Academy. All Rights Reserved.