|
Winter
Reading
by Mike S. Adams, Ph.D.
It has been some time since I recommended books
to my readers. Since many will begin Christmas
shopping soon (or have already) I thought I would
respond today with some recommendations. Here are
four books I did not enjoy and four that I think
offer good rebuttals:
1. God
is Not Great, by Christopher Hitchens.
I read this book after I found out it was
required reading next semester in our Sociology of
Religion course at UNC-Wilmington. I wanted to see
whether it was sociological or even scientific. It
is neither. This anti-religious screed is a highly
prejudicial selection of bad things done in the
name of religion, which seeks nothing more than to
get the reader to adopt atheism. A better sub-title
would have been "How Bad People Sometimes Poison
Religion."
Nonetheless, I recommend the book because it
reminds me of what a miserable person I used to be
as an atheist. I also believe that Hitchens' attack
on Mother Teresa irreparably harms his
credibility.
2. Come
Be My Light, by Mother Teresa.
I read this book right after reading Hitchens'
book. It is an inspirational account of a wonderful
life and a strong rebuttal to those who would see
religion as a crutch. Christianity is a tough
religion. No wonder so many, like Christopher
Hitchens, are unwilling even to concede that Christ
was a real historical figure. After reading this
book, consider what the world would be like if we
all chose atheism. Would you rather live among six
billion Christopher Hitchens or among six billion
Mother Teresas?
3. The
God Delusion, by Richard Dawkins.
The final sentence of Chapter One of this book
reads: "I shall not go out of my way to offend, but
nor shall I don kid gloves to handle religion any
more gently than I would handle anything else."
The next sentence of the book reads: "The God of
the Old Testament is arguably the most unpleasant
character of all fiction: jealous and proud of it;
a vindictive, bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser; a
misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal,
genocidal, filicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal,
sadomasochistic, capriciously malevolent
bully."
Interestingly, I made a decision that all people
are created equal after reading the epistles of
Paul of Tarsus. I am often curious as to which
source the atheist relies on to draw the same
conclusion. Is it possible that we (Christians)
have taught the atheists the very principles they
use to condemn us?
I also wonder how one who considers himself to
be the product of random mutation simultaneously
believes that he is morally superior to others? If
I win the lottery and you lose, I may be luckier
than you. But how am I morally superior to you?
4. The
Dawkins Delusion, by Alister and Joanna
McGrath.
My favorite part of this book is the reprint of
the first sentence of Chapter Two of Dawkins' book.
The McGraths rebut each and every accusation with
Old Testament Scripture. I also am pleased that
they are much more respectful towards Dawkins than
he is towards them - and to Christians in
general.
5. Freakonomics,
by Steven Levitt and Stephen Dupner.
This book has raised quite a stink with its
assertion that legalizing abortion in the 1970s
greatly reduced crime on the 1990s. The book also
makes claims about the effects of right-to-carry
laws on crime rates, which are contrary to what I
have been saying in speeches on college campuses
including Ohio University and, more recently,
Bucknell University. Nonetheless, I always
encourage my readers to seek contrary opinions.
6. Freedomnomics,
by John R. Lott, Jr.
In this enjoyable book, Lott offers an
intriguing argument about the true effects the 1973
"Roe" decision has had on crime. This argument
alone makes the book well worth the purchase price.
But Lott also offers a strong rebuttal to the
assertion that right-to-carry laws have not reduced
crime. Levitt and Dupner suggest that Lott may have
fabricated data and that there has been a
widespread inability of others to replicate his
results. But, why then, are there more refereed
studies (fifteen) showing that CCWs reduce homicide
rates than refereed studies (ten) showing no
effect? And why are there no (exactly zero)
refereed studies showing the CCWs are increasing
homicide rates? Was that not the principal argument
against right-to-carry laws in the first place?
Lott also makes a strong case for the deterrent
effect of the death penalty, which is causing this
lifelong abolitionist to reconsider his
position.
7. Letter
to a Christian Nation, by Sam Harris.
There are two types of opponents to Christianity
- those who misunderstand Christianity and those
who understand but misrepresent Christianity. Sam
Harris is in the latter group. Harris intentionally
lumps "old world" creationism with "new world"
creationism in an attempt to falsely portray
Christians as opponents of science. He also lumps
adult stem cell research (responsible for curing 73
diseases) with embryonic stem cell research
(responsible for curing zero diseases) in an effort
to make Christians appear to be sadistic in their
supposed opposition to science.
I want everyone to read Harris' book to get a
good glimpse at the depth of his intellectual
dishonesty and his anti-religious bigotry.
8. What's
So Great About Christianity, by Dinesh
D'Souza.
Dinesh offers a brilliant rebuttal to the likes
of Harris (and Christopher Hitchens and Richard
Dawkins). If you did not see D'Souza destroy
Hitchens in a recent CSPAN debate, please take the
time to read this great book. It is one of the
finest Christian apologetics since "Mere
Christianity," by C.S. Lewis.
Adams
Archive
©2007 by Mike S. Adams and reprinted with
permission of the author.
Because
The Radical Academy publishes essays and articles
on its website does not imply acceptance or
approval of the comments or opinions expressed by
the author of the material. Nor is the Academy
responsible for any misrepresentation of the facts
included. It is your job to be a critical
reader.
|