|
|
||
 |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||
|
The Jonathan Dolhenty Archive |
 |
|
||
|
|
||||
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Truth and
Fiction in the Da Vinci Code: A Historian Reveals
What We Really Know about Jesus, Mary Magdalene,
and
Constantine, Oxford Univerity Press - October 2004
Reviewed by Dr. Jonathan Dolhenty
Bart D. Ehrman is the chairman of the Department of Religious Studies at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. He is a recognized authority on the early Christian church and the life of Jesus Christ, has appeared as an expert on the History Channel, the A&E Channel, and other broadcast venues, and has authored a number of books within his area of scholarship. In response to the popularity of The Da Vinci Code, a bestselling novel by Dan Brown, which claims to be based on "historical truth," Dr. Ehrman has written Truth and Fiction in the Da Vinci Code as a means of setting the known historical record straight. Brown's novel is in fact not at all accurate in most of its basic religious assertions. That is, Brown's claim that Jesus and Mary Magdalene were married, produced a child, and created a royal ancestral line which still exists is "fiction" not "fact," and is not supported by historical records. In my opinion, this book by Professor Ehrman is absolutely essential reading for anyone who has read Dan Brown's The Da Vinci Code. It challenges the alleged historical "facts" upon which Brown's novel is based and clears the air, so to speak, about the many controversies which The Da Vinci Code has initiated. In the interest of full disclosure and in case some reader may be critical of this review, let me make the following declarations. Yes, I have read Dan Brown's novel and, being an aficionado of mystery thrillers, I thoroughly enjoyed it and, like Professor Ehrman, found it to be a real page-turner and I would recommend it to all who enjoy this genre. Yes, I have read Holy Blood, Holy Grail, by Michael Baigent, et al, the book which Brown seems to have used for much of his "historical" information, and I was fascinated with the theory presented there about Jesus and Mary Magdalene and the existence of a secret society, the Priory of Sion, which has allegedly protected the secret of the Holy Grail down through the centuries. Furthermore, I formally studied Christian theology and history for four years as an undergraduate at a religious college and know at least something about early Christianity and the beliefs and practices of the various Christian sects in existence at the time. I have also taken Professor Ehrman's course in "Lost Christianities: Christian Scriptures and the Battles over Authentication" and had the pleasure of reading and reviewing his recent book entitled Lost Christianities: The Battles for Scripture and the Faiths We Never Knew. And I have done extensive research on my own into the Dead Sea Scrolls and the Nag Hammadi documents. So I was in a position to read Brown's controversial novel without any problem, simply as a piece of exciting fiction to be enjoyed for its own sake, while dismissing the author's historical claims as the invention of an imaginative novelist. It is all too true, unfortunately, that most people get their knowledge of historical events from motion pictures, television, and, of course, fictional books. But when it comes to novels which have a religious theme, particularly a novel which claims to be historically accurate but isn't, the misinformation generated can be particularly deadly, both intellectually and emotionally. Understandably, many traditional Christians will be upset with the allegations put forth by Brown's novel. Professor Ehrman's book addresses the historical inaccuracies in Brown's novel directly, providing the facts and insights of scholarship without demeaning the novel itself as a source of leisure enjoyment for those of us who like to read fictional works of mystery and international intrigue. Dan Brown's primary mistake, in my opinion, was to make the claim at the outset that his novel was based on historical fact. Had he not done that, I suspect there would be no problem or controversy over the content of his work. I have read a number of his novels and enjoyed them immensely. I certainly won't desert him as a reader just because of this single faux pas. The basic questions that Professor Ehrman answers in his analysis of The Da Vinci Code include: What role did the emperor Constantine play in early Christianity and was he responsible for the formation of the New Testament canon?; What role did women play in the development of and practices of early Christianity and was there a feminine factor which was suppressed in later Christianity?; Were the Dead Sea Scrolls a collection of Christian documents (which Brown claims)?; Was Jesus married and were Jewish men in antiquity "condemned" for being celibate?; Was Jesus married to Mary Magdalene?; Did they have a child which was born after Jesus was crucified?; Is there a royal line of descent from Jesus and Mary Magdalene, perpetuated by the birth of their daughter, which has come down to us after almost two thousand years and still exists today?; Is Mary Magdalene indeed the real "Holy Grail," being the font of the seed of Jesus?; Has a secret society, called the Priory of Sion, created in antiquity and still in existence today, fought to protect this secret of the "Holy Grail? These are merely a few examples of the many questions that Professor Ehrman deals with in his book. If you have read or intend to read Dan Brown's The Da Vinci Code or Holy Blood, Holy Grail, by Michael Baigent, et al, I really suggest that you have a copy of Bart Ehrman's Truth and Fiction in the Da Vinci Code by your side. Its presentation of the real historical truth will not detract from your enjoyment of Brown's novel or Baigent's historical "speculation." It will, I guarantee, allow you to evaluate properly the "facts" offered in both Brown and Baigent and help you to place the historical realities about early Christianity and attitudes within early Christianity in the appropriate context to which they are entitled. This book is highly recommended! |
In case you are interested in the background books
In case you are interested in Dr. Ehrman's previous book on the subject of early Christianity |
|
|
|
|
Enrich Your Life With a Philosophy Book... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
||
[Homepage] [Newsletter] [Search] [Support the Academy] [Link to Us] [Contact the Academy] [Citing Articles from Our Website] [Privacy Policy & Disclaimer]
Copyright 1998-99, 2000-01, 2002-03, & 2004 by The Radical Academy. All Rights Reserved.