A Free Nation Deep in
Debt:
The Financial Roots of Democracy, by James
Macdonald
Farrar, Straus & Giroux, (c) 2003, 564
pages
Reviewed by Dr. Jonathan
Dolhenty
"A Free Nation Deep in Debt" is James
Macdonald's first literary contribution to the
field of political economy and it is rich in
historical detail, a fact which may make it a
challenging read for anyone unacquainted with
ordinary economic history and its specific
historiography. Macdonald, an investment banker for
many years who now lives in Oxford, England,
discusses the idea that the way a country borrows
its money is associated with what kind of
government it has. In his discussion, Macdonald
traces the evolution of public debt from antiquity
to the present, arguing that public finance and
political freedom are more closely interrelated
than most people realize.
For those who like some structure in a book of
this complexity, it can easily be divided into an
introduction and four main sections. The first
seven pages, with the title "Introduction: The
Financial Roots of Democracy," sketches out what is
to come, providing the reader with a framework for
the coming text and raising the essential questions
with which the author will wrestle.
The first section traces the history of public
finance and political freedom from the end of the
Bronze Age to the end of the Dark Ages, contrasts
two different types of finances -- tribal and
imperial, explains the historic advantages of
autocratic government, considers the critical
period when some of the emerging societies settled
down and civilized themselves without losing their
political freedom, and, in regard to the so-called
Dark Ages, asks why they had a more intense and
enduring effect in western Europe than in other
places. This initial section sets the stage for a
comprehensive description of the relationship of
public finance and political freedom in the Middle
Ages and modern times.
The second section deals with medieval Europe.
It was to be the role of medieval Italian
city-states to bring back the idea of democratic
public financing and modify it so it could become a
workable plan for public financing. According to
Macdonald, "The system that they created, although
in one way fatally flawed, set off a chain of
events with results that no one could have
predicted." The third section of the book continues
the discussion of public finance by looking at the
attempts of other European states to come to terms
with the implications of the Italian strategy.
The fourth and final section considers events
after the French Revolution, and the author
suggests that "The outcome of the Napoleonic Wars
demonstrated the superiority of a political system
based on the alliance of parliamentary government
and public debt, but now there was a new question:
Would a system created in a world of restricted
citizenship and limited franchise prove compatible
with universal suffrage. It was the role of the
nineteenth century to find a solution to this
problem. In the devastating wars of the first half
of the twentieth century, this solution was put to
the test." And Macdonald concludes that "The First
World War was the apotheosis of 'democratic' public
finance, the Second its swan song."
Throughout the reading of "A Free Nation Deep in
Debt," one is struck continually by both the
historical detail the author has uncovered and the
factual surprises which he springs on the reader.
How many of us realize, for instance, that the
problem of public financing was intimately related
to the fall of Rome or that in the eighteenth
century it was commonly accepted that public debt
and political liberty were intimately related?
Regarding our own time and country, how many of us
realize that the role played by the United States
in World War I was funded with public debt?
I will leave it to the experts in economic
theory and history to evaluate what appear to be
Macdonald's conclusions in this romp through
political economy from ancient Mesopotamia to the
United States in the twentieth century. Has public
borrowing from citizens in times of war gone hand
in hand with modern democracy, as Macdonald argues?
Does he present a compelling case showing why a
democratic government is able to borrow more
cheaply from its citizen-lenders than an autocratic
state who does not consider its citizens to be
equals? Was, in fact, World War II the "swan song"
of democratic public financing? And, if true, has
this occurred as a result of a decline in the
public's trust of government, particularly in
Western nations, combined with increasing
globalization of the economy?
Readers can decide for themselves whether
Macdonald adequately answers the above questions,
as well as the other questions he tackles. Suffice
to say, "A Free Nation Deep in Debt" is a
comprehensive and detailed consideration regarding
a certain aspect of economic history, specifically
the relationship between public financing and
political freedom. Certainly an interesting read,
but let the reader beware. This scholarly book is
definitely not Sunday afternoon "leisure"
reading.
Fortunately for the reader, this book is
enhanced with a detailed appendix of notes on
currencies which describes them and sets out their
relationships in historical context. Furthermore, a
helpful glossary is provided which explains the
technical terms used in the text, although the
educated reader will not have much difficulty with
the terms as they are used since they are explained
as they occur within the text itself. The author
has also provided thirty-five pages of notes, a
21-page bibliography, and a useful index with both
major and minor topics listed.
A Free Nation Deep in
Debt: The Financial Roots of Democracy, by James
Macdonald