|
Dr. Restak is a neurologist and
neuropsychiatrist and an expert in brain function
and the ongoing research of brain physiology and
development. He is a clinical professor of
neurology at George Washington Medical Center in
the nation's capital and author of more than 15
books on the brain and brain function and appears
often in the national media as a popular
commentator on scientific research.
What, in general, is the book about? Well, it is
about genetic mapping, imaging technology,
psychopharmacology, the fact that our brains are
working differently from how they did a century
ago, in what manner and why the demands of our
modern world are bringing about changes in the
brain itself, the dramatic new treatments that can
repair damage in the brain, the way new drugs can
influence how the brain operates and what behaviors
can and will result, and the probability that
technology, rather than biology, will play the
major role in the evolution of the human brain.
This is a compact book (only 212 pages of text)
for books dealing with such complex topics, but
that may well be to its advantage. It is, after
all, written for the ordinary person and not the
expert and therein lies its value. Members of the
general public need to know what is going on in the
area of modern brain research and what impact some
of the new technologies in neuroscience may have on
their lives. Furthermore, there are potential
misuses of and abuses in some of these
technologies, there are moral or ethical issues
present, and all of us need to have enough
knowledge so we can make informed decisions about
how we want to permit this new research to affect
our lives.
Rather than attempt to provide an overview of
all or most of the major topics in Restak's book,
let me focus briefly on three revelations that
Restak presents from the current research which are
sure to be controversial and I found particularly
intriguing.
The first one is that it may be possible that
brain imaging techniques such as functional
magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) can indicate when
you are telling the truth and when you are lying, a
tool that would certainly be valuable to a
prosecutor and jury if evidence from such a
technique was ever accepted by courts of law.
Another technique called Brain Fingerprinting,
which detects changes in the brain's electrical
activity, has already been used in criminal
investigations and Restak cites one example where
the investigation led to a life sentence in prison.
Interesting stuff, that. And the efficacy of such
tools will surely be widely debated on the popular
media talk-shows.
Another controversial area that Restak explores
is that of the influence of violence in the media
on brain physiology and behavior. There are, he
notes, more than 1,000 studies which support the
conclusion "that when children watch violent media
they become more aggressive." Without getting into
the matter of TV or movie censorship, Restak
presents some rather powerful evidence and says
"...we know that watching violence -- or even just
imagining it -- reduces the functional activity of
those parts of our brain that are normally enlisted
to inhibit violent impulses." He concludes that
"From a practical point of view, it makes a lot of
sense...to avoid vivid images of events that,
according to what we're learning from new brain
research, can lead to psychological harm." I
suspect we'll hear a lot more about this research
in the future and it will be widely debated.
My personal favorite, however, is his brief
discussion regarding the two methods that have
traditionally been used to teach children to read.
The controversy over which teaching method is best
-- phonics or whole-word (aka "look-say") -- has
raged for decades. I spent over seventeen years in
the public schools and was a strong advocate of
phonics, finding myself decidedly in the minority
all that time. Now, according to Restak, brain
research may have decided the issue. The question
he asks is: "Which of the two methods corresponds
most closely to what happens in the brain during
reading?" The answer, Restak says, is that "recent
fMRI studies have largely come down in favor of
phonics." I just knew that some day my position on
the matter would be vindicated by science. And so
it seems.
The only criticism I have of the book regards
its subtitle, "How the Modern Age is Rewiring Your
Mind." As a philosopher in the tradition of
Classical Realism, I make a distinction in kind
between the human brain and the human mind. The
human brain may be "rewiring" itself, but the human
mind cannot do so. It is understandable, however,
why Dr. Restak fails to make this distinction;
unfortunately, most empirical scientists today also
fail to make it. It is interesting, though, that
while he uses the term "mind" in his subtitle, no
where else in the book do I find him using that
term.
This book is a good read. And, I think, an
important one considering the nature of the topic
and its significance to all our lives. It is
generally nontechnical and easily understood, but
be aware that it is really an overview of a deeply
complex subject. I highly recommend it to
everyone.
Enrich
Your Life With a Philosophy Book...
Enrich
Your Life With a Philosophy
Magazine...
|