|
February 3, 2008
What
Will You Do With Your Gold?
by Gary North, Ph.D.
This
assumes you have bought some gold.
A lot of my readers have read my recommendation
-- "Buy some gold" -- for six years. They still
haven't bought any. They apparently think it's good
enough to have read a few reports on the importance
of buying gold. "Now I don't actually have to buy
any." It's like an overweight person reading a diet
book while munching on Fritos and bean dip.
There is an astounding amount of misinformation
on gold available on the Web. This shows the
tremendous impact of the Web. Back in 1995, this
misinformation was far more limited in its
scope.
Here is the main piece of information: "Gold!
Gold! I'll be rich -- rich, I tell you!
Hahahahaha."
No, you won't. Here's why.
IN THE MANIA, YOU WON'T SELL
I have been through a gold mania: 1979. People
who had heard about gold from 1976 ($105/oz) all
the way up into the range of $700 finally decided
to get in. They had seen silver make similar gains.
Newcomers wanted to buy. Old-timers didn't want to
sell. Prices soared.
Then, in one month -- January 1980 -- gold's
price peaked for one day at $850 and then plummeted
by over $200 over the next few days. For the next
21 years, gold was a bad investment, and silver was
even worse: from $50 to $4.50, plus a loss of 50%
in purchasing power to boot. There was no worse
investment in that era than silver. Yet all the way
down, there were coin businesses that sold people
silver coins. Some salesmen used exactly the same
arguments that they use today to persuade people to
buy. For 21 years, the arguments were incorrect.
The better dealers just quoted prices and made
deliveries. They did not hype the product. They are
still in business.
Newcomers to the precious metals market don't
know this story. They should.
So, trust me when I tell you that you will not
sell your precious metals during the mania. In a
mania, buyers think, "It will cost more tomorrow. I
must buy today." Most would-be sellers think the
same thing. They refuse to sell. Only a few see
what's coming and sell at the top.
This is true of everything that becomes the
focus of a mania, not just precious metals. Think
"dot-com stocks, March 12, 2000." Think "S&P
500, March 24, 2000."
So, why hold precious metals?
THE CRACK-UP BOOM
This golden phrase was coined by Ludwig von
Mises. In Chapter 17 of his book on economics,
Human
Action, he described the breakdown
of a monetary system. The breakdown begins with
fiat money inflation by a government or its
licensed central bank. This creates an economic
boom, as he described in Chapter 20.
Over time, people recognize that price inflation
will continue. They begin to hedge themselves
against the effects of price inflation. They stop
lending money to be paid back in a depreciating
currency. They buy hard goods, such as gold and
silver.
The crack-up boom is not part of the normal ups
and downs of commodity prices. The following is
normal.
- He who believes that the prices of the goods
in which he takes an interest will rise, buys
more of them than he would have bought in the
absence of this belief; accordingly he restricts
his cash holding. He who believes that prices
will drop, restricts his purchases and thus
enlarges his cash holding. As long as such
speculative anticipations are limited to some
commodities, they do not bring about a general
tendency toward changes in cash holding.
The trouble begins when people decide that they
had better get rid of cash. To do this, they must
find sellers of goods who do not see what is
happening or who think the rise in prices is
temporary.
- When they expect that the money prices of
all goods will rise or fall, they expand or
restrict their purchases. These attitudes
strengthen and accelerate the expected
tendencies considerably. This goes on until the
point is reached beyond which no further changes
in the purchasing power of money are expected.
Only then does this inclination to buy or to
sell stop and do people begin again to increase
or to decrease their cash holdings.
The trouble is, not many people perceive this
change at the top of the mania. Most people can't
get out at the top. Remember the investor's
command: "Sell!" Remember the broker's response:
"To whom?"
As the mania grows, public opinion changes.
- But if once public opinion is convinced that
the increase in the quantity of money will
continue and never come to an end, and that
consequently the prices of all commodities and
services will not cease to rise, everybody
becomes eager to buy as much as possible and to
restrict his cash holding to a minimum size. For
under these circumstances the regular costs
incurred by holding cash are increased by the
losses caused by the progressive fall in
purchasing power. The advantages of holding cash
must be paid for by sacrifices which are deemed
unreasonably burdensome. This phenomenon was, in
the great European inflations of the twenties,
called flight into real goods (Flucht in die
Sachwerte) or crack-up boom
(Katastrophenhausse).
Let me tell you a great story. I have told it
many times over the years. Back in the 1970's, I
knew a retired banker named Norbert Einstein. He
was very urbane, the model of a European gentlemen.
He was the cousin of a more famous Einstein. He
told me about the experience of their Aunt
Rosa.
Aunt Rosa was a slow learner, unlike her
nephews. She did not catch on to what the German
central bank was doing until 1923, the final year
of the mass inflation. She finally figured out that
she needed to buy hard assets. But she had waited
too long. There were none to buy. Well, almost
none. She did find a seller of a niche product:
bedpans. She took all of her money and bought a
stack of them. Shortly thereafter, the German
government had a currency reform, the central bank
ceased inflating, and this ended the great
inflation. The demand for hard goods slowed
dramatically.
There was Aunt Rosa, figuratively sitting on top
of a pile of bedpans.
In every crack-up boom, there will be many Aunt
Rosas. Your goal should therefore be to avoid
winding up with the equivalent of bedpans as your
retirement portfolio.
Mises continued to describe the crack-up
boom.
- The characteristic mark of this phenomenon
is that the increase in the quantity of money
causes a fall in the demand for money. The
tendency toward a fall in purchasing power as
generated by the increased supply of money is
intensified by the general propensity to
restrict cash holdings which it brings about.
Eventually a point is reached where the prices
at which people would be prepared to part with
real goods discount to such an extent the
expected progress in the fall of purchasing
power that nobody has a sufficient amount of
cash at hand to pay them. The monetary system
breaks down; all transactions in the money
concerned cease; a panic makes its purchasing
power vanish altogether. People return either to
barter or to the use of another kind of
money.
This is the end result of every expansion of
money that is not halted earlier by the monetary
authorities. But if they do call a halt, then there
will be a recession or a depression. Mises
described why in Chapter 20.
The problem is, central bankers and politicians
are unwilling to accept this result. So, they
reinflate. The march toward the crack-up boom
continues.
- This first stage of the inflationary process
may last for many years. While it lasts, the
prices of many goods and services are not yet
adjusted to the altered money relation. There
are still people in the country who have not yet
become aware of the fact that they are
confronted with a price revolution which will
finally result in a considerable rise of all
prices, although the extent of this rise will
not be the same in the various commodities and
services. These people still believe that prices
one day will drop. Waiting for this day, they
restrict their purchases and concomitantly
increase their cash holdings. As long as such
ideas are still held by public opinion, it is
not yet too late for the government to abandon
its inflationary policy.
This is our present situation. The public still
prefers the boom effects of monetary inflation to
the recessionary effects of monetary
stabilization.
- But then finally the masses wake up. They
become suddenly aware of the fact that inflation
is a deliberate policy and will go on endlessly.
A breakdown occurs. The crack-up boom appears.
Everybody is anxious to swap his money against
real goods, no matter whether he needs them or
not, no matter how much money he has to pay for
them. Within a very short time, within a few
weeks or even days, the things which were used
as money are no longer used as media of
exchange. They become scrap paper.
Nobody wants to give away anything against them.
We are nowhere near this yet. But this is the end
result of a policy of monetary inflation.
What Mises described is a breakdown in the
exchange economy. Once again, I cite him.
- The monetary system breaks down; all
transactions in the money concerned cease; a
panic makes its purchasing power vanish
altogether. People return either to barter or to
the use of another kind of money.
This is the equivalent of a depression. It is an
inflationary depression.
THE DIVISION OF LABOR
In 1923, at the peak of the German inflation,
the prices of goods in Berlin as denominated in
pounds sterling were higher than the prices of the
same goods in London. Why? Because production had
collapsed. The division of labor had collapsed. To
get goods imported from outside the country,
entrepreneurs had to take greater risks.
Uncertainty increased. Because the orderly markets
had disappeared in the wave of price inflation,
supplies of everything became much tighter than
outside Germany. Buyers in other nations could
outbid German buyers, even in those cases where
German buyers had foreign currencies and gold.
Gold and foreign currencies kept families alive.
It did not make them rich.
Then who won? The great winners were farmers.
They easily paid off their pre-War debts. Even
before 1923, a farmer could pay off all of his
debts by the money generated by the sale of a
single egg.
What counted most in 1923 was your ability to
keep your job. What made jobs desirable were
products to sell that everyone wanted: basic
foodstuffs, coal, and liquor. People in cities sold
off their prized possessions and heirlooms in order
to get food. The flow of grand pianos to German
farmers never again reached such a rate.
There was almost no way to get rich in cities.
There was no asset, other than stored food and
coal, that could have made someone rich. But rich
as measured in what? The greatest urban wealth was
food and coal. Holders refused to sell.
The same story appears in the Bible. In II Kings
6, we read of a siege that was so horrendous that
women ate their infant children, a practice which
had been prophesied by Moses centuries before
(Deut. 28:57). No one got rich in that siege.
Almost no one gets rich in a crack-up boom. The
few who do generally go bankrupt after the currency
reform, when economic conditions return to
normal.
THEN WHAT GOOD IS GOLD?
Gold serves as a valuable asset in the time
leading up to the crack-up boom. Its price rises
faster than the prices of most other assets.
In the crack-up boom, gold serves as an
insurance policy against a catastrophe. You can buy
your way out of circumstances that bankrupt others.
You preserve much of your lifestyle by selling off
a widely sought-after asset: gold. But understand:
this is not a way to get rich. It is a way not to
become totally impoverished.
After the currency reform, gold is more likely
than any other crack-up boom asset to retain its
purchasing power. This means that gold is a good
investment in three phases: in the years before the
crack-up boom, during the boom, and in the
reconstruction phase after the boom.
Other assets require trading in and out. They
require almost perfect timing. Gold doesn't. You
buy it before the boom is expected (e.g., 2001),
hold it through the boom phase and the crack-up
phase, and then re-enter the capital markets as the
owner of an asset that has universal desirability
as an investment.
You don't get rich as a holder of gold during a
time of serious inflation. Yet get rich as an
investor with capital to invest after the crack-up
boom has ended.
CONCLUSION
People do not see gold in this way. They see it
as a way to get rich in a time of inflation. They
do not understand this principle of economics:
- The division of labor through invested
capital is what makes people rich, slowly. The
crack-up boom destroys the division of labor.
Most people get poor in the crack-up boom,
except those who (1) operate successfully in a
low division of labor environment (think
"Amish") and (2) debtors who live outside urban
areas, who pay of their debts with depreciated
money.
The Amish don't pay much attention to their
wealth, except maybe to buy better horses. Debtors
who learn how to play the pyramiding game in the
boom phase generally go bankrupt after the monetary
stabilization takes place.
So, don't expect to get rich in an age of
inflation by owning gold. That's because you would
have to sell it to get rich. Your timing had better
be perfect.
Don't wind up like the entrepreneur described in
II Kings 7:16&endash;20. His timing was deadly.
Because
The Radical Academy publishes essays and articles
on its website does not imply acceptance or
approval of the comments or opinions expressed by
the author of the material. Nor is the Academy
responsible for any misrepresentation of the facts
included. It is your job to be a critical
reader.
Enrich
Your Life With A Business Or Finance
Book
|