|
Mortimer J. Adler:
On Coercion and Duress
Free choice is voluntary action, the very
opposite of the compulsory. What is called,
coercion occurs when individuals are compelled by
force to do something that they would not do
voluntarily.
The individual who surrenders his wallet to a
thug who holds a revolver to his head does so under
compulsion and involuntarily. He is being coerced.
Police, who enforce the law against criminals'
exercise coercive force.
If all individuals obeyed the law voluntarily
because they acknowledged its authority and its
justice, there would be no need for coercive force.
Because they do not, coercive force must be used to
enforce law in a population that includes
individuals who do not acknowledge its authority
and justice
What about those acts which no one would do
voluntarily, but, which, nevertheless, are not done
to avoid the threat of coercive force. Are they
done voluntarily or involuntarily?
In his Nicomachean Ethics, Book III,
Chapter I, Aristotle considers the action of the
captain of a ship who throws his cargo overboard in
order to save his ship in a storm at sea. Is he
acting voluntarily or involuntarily? Clearly, it is
not involuntarily. The captain is not compelled to
jettison his cargo under the circumstances, but
under those circumstances, he thinks it preferable
to jettison the cargo rather than lose his
ship.
The word "duress" is used for such actions that
partake of both the voluntary and the involuntary.
Another word that might be used for such actions is
"nonvoluntary." It applies to actions that partake
of both the voluntary and the involuntary. The
captain could have chosen otherwise under the
circumstances. His choice, being free, is
voluntary.
All of us, who act under duress, act voluntarily
and by free choice. We are not compelled or
coerced, but we also do something that no one would
regard as desirable.
Enrich
Your Life With a Philosophy Book...
Enrich
Your Life With a Philosophy
Magazine...
Academy
Showcase
Specials
|
|
|
|
|
|