Homepage
Newsletter
Search
Updates
About
Adler
Dolhenty
Adventures
Philosophers
Critiques
Glossary
Quotations
Mini-courses
Aquinas
Essays
Philosophy
Politics
Religion
Education
Science
Media
FAQ
Ask
Guestbook
Forum
Bookstore
Emporium
Newsstand
Calendar
Subscribe
Feedback
Tell a friend
Votecaster
Cartoons

Politics Resource Center

Essays, Opinion, & Commentary

Something to Think About Index

Politics Resource Center Main Page


Books about Politics and Current Events in The Radical Academy Bookstore
Click Here for New & Used College Textbooks at Discount Prices

Click Here for College Education Information & Study Resources


Shop Amazon Stores in the Radical Academy

Bookstore
Magazine Outlet
Music Store
Video Store
DVD Store
Computer Store
Camera & Photo Store
Computer/Video Games
Software Store
Outlet Store
Cellular Phones
Toys & Games
Tools & Hardware
Outdoor Living
Consumer Electronics
Kitchen & Housewares
Baby Superstore
Apparel & Accessories
Gourmet Food
Sporting Goods
Jewelry & Watches
Health & Personal Care




Something to Think About

 

The Action and the Reaction: Part I

by Gordon Francis Corbett

 

Tranquillity reinforces opinions; tumult calls them into question. So, someone observed, public opinion changes only when heated.

What do the "civil rights" demonstrations of the 'sixties, the Viet-Nam War, and the attacks of 11 September have in common? The answer is, "television." Television brought them into our homes. Seeing police charge demonstrators on the Edmund Pettus Bridge, watching Viet-cong kill American soldiers, and looking on as Arab terrorists collapsed skyscrapers in New York all made us question hitherto undoubted assumptions.

Consider the demonstrations. Television reporters rarely described them even-handedly. Instead, they presented alleged facts, bolstered with dramatic motion pictures.

Their exercise of judgment kept many viewers from using their own. Consequently, when their television screens showed supposedly villainous Southern police attacking allegedly heroic demonstrators, they wrote our Representatives and Senators to demand that they grant the demonstrators' goals.

The reporters' implicit idea was not that the Constitution was "broke," and therefore needed fixing, but that new social thinking had made it obsolete. Sociologists had found the purportedly "rigid" South stupid and cruel. Result: the public backed the transformation of the Founders' Constitutionally federative republic into a unitary democracy, whose subordinate states Washington would supervise.

Or, look at the Viet-Nam War. War is a horrible thing. Its sights and sounds repel every right-thinking person. Television reporters presented those sights and sounds, implied that our blood and treasure was propping up an Asian dictatorship, and showed college students burning draft cards. Result: the public backed leaving Viet-Nam.

Concerning 11 September, remember how our reporters covered it, and have been covering the subsequent war. Look up the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, and Eighth Amendments. Ponder the number of their prohibitions that our government now ignores.

More in Part II.

 


Enrich your life with a book about politics and current events...

Enrich your political & social life with a politics or news magazine...


Something to Think About Index

Politics Resource Center Main Page



-- Top of Page --

[Homepage] [Newsletter] [Search] [Support the Academy] [Link to Us] [Contact the Academy] [Citing Articles from Our Website] [Privacy Policy & Disclaimer]

Copyright 1998-99, 2000-01, & 2002-03 by The Radical Academy. All Rights Reserved.