Homepage
Newsletter
Search
Updates
About
Adler
Dolhenty
Adventures
Philosophers
Critiques
Glossary
Quotations
Mini-courses
Aquinas
Essays
Philosophy
Politics
Religion
Education
Science
Media
FAQ
Ask
Guestbook
Forum
Bookstore
Emporium
Newsstand
Calendar
Subscribe
Feedback
Tell a friend
Votecaster
Cartoons

Politics Resource Center

Essays, Opinion, & Commentary

Something to Think About Index

Politics Resource Center Main Page


Books about Politics and Current Events in The Radical Academy Bookstore
Click Here for New & Used College Textbooks at Discount Prices

Click Here for College Education Information & Study Resources


Shop Amazon Stores in the Radical Academy

Bookstore
Magazine Outlet
Music Store
Video Store
DVD Store
Computer Store
Camera & Photo Store
Computer/Video Games
Software Store
Outlet Store
Cellular Phones
Toys & Games
Tools & Hardware
Outdoor Living
Consumer Electronics
Kitchen & Housewares
Baby Superstore
Apparel & Accessories
Gourmet Food
Sporting Goods
Jewelry & Watches
Health & Personal Care




Something to Think About

 

Division and Multiplication

by Gordon Francis Corbett

 

An epistemological principle says that we learn about the world by distinguishing one thing from another, or one quality from another, by learning their respective characteristics. Thus, we come to know that a chair is not a dog, and that heat is not cold.

The same principle works in politics. Every political creed has its own characteristics. Liberalism differs from conservatism, and both of them disagree with libertarianism. Their definitions differ, as do their premises, their purposes, and the set phrases of verbal shorthand that their adherents use to communicate.

Nevertheless, some political rhetoric repudiates this elementary thinking. During our biannual election seasons, we frequently hear words like, "John Smith does not believe in dividing us. He believes in bringing us together. Support Smith and help to unify America."

These phrases are designed to create problems for Smith's opponent, Jones. If Jones does not believe in bringing us together, he must believe in dividing us, or at least, in doing nothing to achieve unification. This is especially true if Jones offers the voters a philosophy radically different from Smith's. On the other hand, Jones must offer the voters something different or surrender the race to Smith.

Today, the two major parties really constitute one party, whose two branches agree philosophically, but compete by offering the voters differences in rhetorical style and in physical appearance.

That is where you and I come in. We show the voters, in stark, clear, rational terms, that our philosophy differs radically from our opponents,' and why it beats theirs. When those voters grasp the nature and the advantages of that difference, they will see that we offer them what Barry Goldwater once called, "a choice, not an echo."

Only rational division can let our ranks multiply.

 


Enrich your life with a book about politics and current events...

Enrich your political & social life with a politics or news magazine...


Something to Think About Index

Politics Resource Center Main Page



-- Top of Page --

[Homepage] [Newsletter] [Search] [Support the Academy] [Link to Us] [Contact the Academy] [Citing Articles from Our Website] [Privacy Policy & Disclaimer]

Copyright 1998-99, 2000-01, & 2002-03 by The Radical Academy. All Rights Reserved.