|
Something
to Think About
The
Limits of Courage
by Gordon Francis Corbett
Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary defines
courage as, "mental or moral strength to venture,
persevere, and withstand danger, fear, or
difficulty."
Because we all want to prevent harm, we all
admire courage. Sometimes, we have it; sometimes,
we lack it. Physical courage lets us stand up to a
bully or enter a burning house. Moral courage lets
us defend an unpopular cause or face people we have
let down.
Nevertheless, courage is limited by its nature.
Courage is not cleanliness, reverence, honesty,
industry, or any of the other virtues, whose
natures limit them.
War heroes exemplify courage. Because we admire
it, and because we imagine that it will let them
discharge their duties faithfully, we sometimes
elect them to public office.
Unfortunately, we do not know whether, or to
what, they will be faithful. Their political
philosophies will determine that, and philosophy is
a thing very different from courage. Courage is
simple and elemental; philosophy is an often
abstract intellectual construct.
Consider two men who served very honorably in
our Armed Forces, but whose philosophical
differences produced very different results in
public office. Former prisoner of war Senator
Jeremiah Denton served Alabama, and our
Constitution, well. Medal of Honor winner Senator
Robert Kerrey brought home the bacon for Nebraska,
but he was no Constitutionalist.
These men illustrate why we should not vote for
war heroes merely because they are war heroes. We
should vote for anyone only if that individual will
serve our political goals. If he, or she, served
heroically in our Armed Forces, so much the better;
but we must never let the red badge of courage
blind us to the bright light of philosophy.
Enrich
your life with a book about politics and current
events...
Enrich
your political & social life with a politics or
news magazine...
|