Homepage
Newsletter
Search
Updates
About
Adler
Dolhenty
Adventures
Philosophers
Critiques
Glossary
Quotations
Mini-courses
Aquinas
Essays
Philosophy
Politics
Religion
Education
Science
Media
FAQ
Ask
Guestbook
Forum
Bookstore
Emporium
Newsstand
Calendar
Subscribe
Feedback
Tell a friend
Votecaster
Cartoons

Politics Resource Center

Essays, Opinion, & Commentary

Something to Think About Index

Politics Resource Center Main Page


Books about Politics and Current Events in The Radical Academy Bookstore
Click Here for New & Used College Textbooks at Discount Prices

Click Here for College Education Information & Study Resources


Shop Amazon Stores in the Radical Academy

Bookstore
Magazine Outlet
Music Store
Video Store
DVD Store
Computer Store
Camera & Photo Store
Computer/Video Games
Software Store
Outlet Store
Cellular Phones
Toys & Games
Tools & Hardware
Outdoor Living
Consumer Electronics
Kitchen & Housewares
Baby Superstore
Apparel & Accessories
Gourmet Food
Sporting Goods
Jewelry & Watches
Health & Personal Care




August 14, 2002 

Something to Think About

 

The Voucher Trap

by Gordon Francis Corbett

 

After the Supreme Court ruled that school vouchers are Constitutional, some authorities said that vouchers are just as Constitutional as the G.I. Bill was. They are right, but not in the way they intend.

Some admirers of the G.I. Bill say that its Constitutional legitimacy came from Congress's power to raise armies. That is not true.

The raising of armies comprises recruiting, equipping, and training. Education takes no part, except for the instruction that helps soldiers to carry out their military tasks. No Constitutional provision sanctions the G.I. Bill.

The G.I. Bill inaugurated the Federal defrayal of higher education. It was fascism in action: not the fascism we had defeated, to be sure; but fascism it was, nevertheless.

Fascism and socialism are two different peas in the "pod" of collectivism. Socialism takes private property outright; but fascism, while leaving owners in ostensible possession, steals their rightful prerogatives with a blizzard of regulations.

This is the trap awaiting private schools that accept tax-defrayed vouchers. In the 1941 case of Wickard vs. Filburn, the Supreme Court said that "It is hardly lack of due process for the government to regulate that which it subsidizes."

So, to obtain Federal aid for its schools, a State's Department of Education signs contracts binding them to Federal regulations. Tax-defrayed State vouchers will do the same to recipient private schools.

The relevant questions are: how many schools' owners will recognize this trap how soon, and tell how many of their fellows how swiftly.

When the penny finally drops, the recipient schools' owners will react in one of two ways. Some will expel their voucher-paid students after the current term and reject all vouchers thereafter. Others, eager for the students' fees and, perhaps, fearing to leave "the national consensus," will continue accepting the shekels and shackles.

A few schools will remain completely private. When the trap springs, and the victims scream out their anguish, the truly private schools' owners will receive their vindication.

On them, ultimately, will the fate of American education depend.

 


Enrich your life with a book about politics and current events...

Enrich your political & social life with a politics or news magazine...


Something to Think About Index

Politics Resource Center Main Page



-- Top of Page --

[Homepage] [Newsletter] [Search] [Support the Academy] [Link to Us] [Contact the Academy] [Citing Articles from Our Website] [Privacy Policy & Disclaimer]

Copyright 1998-99, 2000-01, & 2002-03 by The Radical Academy. All Rights Reserved.