Politics Resource Center

Homepage

Essays, Opinion, & Commentary

Something to Think About Index

Politics Resource Center Main Page


Books about Politics and Current Events in The Radical Academy Bookstore
Click Here for New & Used College Textbooks at Discount Prices

Click Here for College Education Information & Study Resources


Shop Amazon Stores in the Radical Academy

Bookstore
Magazine Outlet
Music Store
Video Store
DVD Store
Computer Store
Camera & Photo Store
Computer/Video Games
Software Store
Outlet Store
Cellular Phones
Toys & Games
Tools & Hardware
Outdoor Living
Consumer Electronics
Kitchen & Housewares
Baby Superstore
Apparel & Accessories
Gourmet Food
Sporting Goods
Jewelry & Watches
Health & Personal Care




October 21, 2002

Something to Think About

 

The Real Meaning of "Commander-in-Chief"

by Gordon Francis Corbett

 

The term "commander-in-chief" means that the president, as head of the executive branch of government, commands the armed forces. Each armed force has its own commanders, but the Constitution grants the president authority superseding that given to any of them. In Mafia slang, the president is the capo di tutti capi: "the boss of all the bosses."

"Commander-in-chief" does not mean that, in time of war or other national emergency, the president becomes a dictator. Even when the country is at war, our president must still obey the Constitution.

Regardless, some past presidents, such as Abraham Lincoln and Franklin Roosevelt, have usurped powers. These powers were either Congressional, as in Lincoln's suspension of habeas corpus, or expressly unconstitutional, as in Franklin Roosevelt's imprisoning, without trial, Americans of Japanese descent during World War II.

The courts and the public have allowed these crimes. The courts allow them, probably, because they fear retaliation from the Executive; the public allow them because they fear losing the war, and they trust that "their" president will not abuse his power.

This tendency will not abate soon. Our schools no longer teach the Constitution's history and philosophy; so, as the years pass, the percentage of Americans who understand them decreases. I graduated from high school in 1961, and mine may have been the last generation to learn the Constitution thoroughly.

Even then, the textbook and the teacher taught that the Constitution's intended purpose of limiting governmental power had become passé, and, at least implicitly, had done so for good reason. I had to learn why the Constitution's intended role is good from my father and from author-commentator Dan Smoot.

Therefore, when politicians and pundits talk about the president's role as "commander-in-chief," most of their audiences will think that they understand their subject, but will not really know.

We must tell them.

 


Enrich your life with a book about politics and current events...

Enrich your political & social life with a politics or news magazine...


Something to Think About Index

Politics Resource Center Main Page



-- Top of Page --

[Homepage] [Newsletter] [Search] [Support the Academy] [Link to Us] [Contact the Academy] [Citing Articles from Our Website] [Privacy Policy & Disclaimer]

Copyright 1998-99, 2000-01, & 2002-03 by The Radical Academy. All Rights Reserved.