Homepage
Newsletter
Search
Updates
About
Adler
Dolhenty
Adventures
Philosophers
Critiques
Glossary
Quotations
Mini-courses
Aquinas
Essays
Philosophy
Politics
Religion
Education
Science
Media
FAQ
Ask
Guestbook
Forum
Bookstore
Emporium
Newsstand
Calendar
Subscribe
Feedback
Tell a friend
Votecaster
Cartoons

Politics Resource Center

Essays, Opinion, & Commentary

Something to Think About Index

Politics Resource Center Main Page


Books about Politics and Current Events in The Radical Academy Bookstore
Click Here for New & Used College Textbooks at Discount Prices

Click Here for College Education Information & Study Resources


Shop Amazon Stores in the Radical Academy

Bookstore
Magazine Outlet
Music Store
Video Store
DVD Store
Computer Store
Camera & Photo Store
Computer/Video Games
Software Store
Outlet Store
Cellular Phones
Toys & Games
Tools & Hardware
Outdoor Living
Consumer Electronics
Kitchen & Housewares
Baby Superstore
Apparel & Accessories
Gourmet Food
Sporting Goods
Jewelry & Watches
Health & Personal Care




Something to Think About

 

Executive Tyranny

by Gordon Francis Corbett

 

Perhaps the most salient aspect of the Clinton Administration was its use of Executive orders.

The Constitution grants presidents no specific power to write Executive orders. Its closest provision is in Article 2, Section 3, which says, "...he shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed...", but those laws are ones passed by Congress. Clinton's orders wrote new law.

Once, long ago, Executive orders were innocuous instructions that set bureaucratic procedures. Later, some presidents used them to block Congress. When Congressional committees began looking for Communists working in his administration, President Eisenhower signed an order telling his departments not to cooperate. Although this directive seemed wrongheaded at best, it could be interpreted as a legitimate check on Congressional power.

The Constitution lets only Congress legislate, and it does not give Congress leave to delegate that power. Regardless, our Representatives and Senators have permitted presidents to write Executive orders that have the power of law; and, despite its un-Constitutionality, that delegation has been allowed to endure.

An older example is Congress's letting the Executive write economic regulations.

Herbert Hoover started it. The economy had collapsed. He persuaded Congress to give his departments broad powers to write regulations, so that they could "fix" the economy. Later, Congress passed more laws to enact Franklin Roosevelt's "New Deal." When the Supreme Court struck down most of it, Roosevelt responded by threatening to pack the Court with his men. Since then, the courts have generally supported Executive legislation.

Gradually, Executive departments' writing laws became routine. Now, a president's staff can do it.

Summary: power has been concentrated; checks have been removed; and our Constitution's protections hang by a thread.

Ronald Reagan said it best: "Freedom has never been so fragile, so close to slipping from our grasp, as it is at this moment."

 


Enrich your life with a book about politics and current events...

Enrich your political & social life with a politics or news magazine...


Something to Think About Index

Politics Resource Center Main Page



-- Top of Page --

[Homepage] [Newsletter] [Search] [Support the Academy] [Link to Us] [Contact the Academy] [Citing Articles from Our Website] [Privacy Policy & Disclaimer]

Copyright 1998-99, 2000-01, & 2002-03 by The Radical Academy. All Rights Reserved.