|
U.S.
Executions: No End to the Killing
by Charles Levendosky
(©1998 and reproduced with permission of
Charles Levendosky,
the Casper Star-Tribune, and the NY Times
Syndicate)
America's death penalty madness intensifies. By
the evening of April 24, states had executed 24
individuals since 1998 began - seven more than on
the same date last year, a record execution
year.
The week of April 20 added four bodies the
execution count. The last week of April will throw
on at least two more.
A week doesn't pass without one or two or more
state-sponsored lethal injections or
electrocutions.
Like a fever, the United States may top 100 for
1998. Blood fever. And Texas will undoubtedly
continue to lead this made delirium, as it does
with five lethal injections for the year.
One of those five was 17 years old, a juvenile,
when he murdered Anne Walsh, a woman who befriended
him. As a child, Joseph John Cannon was sexually
abused by one of his stepfathers and as a teen, by
a grandfather. At the age of 10, he was diagnosed
as schizophrenic and as suffering from organic
brain damage resulting from sniffing solvents.
Pope John Paul wrote to Texas Gov. George Bush
Jr., asking him to spare Cannon - to no avail.
Texas is one of 24 states that allow those under
the age of 18 to be sentenced to death. The state
has another juvenile offender scheduled for
execution, Robert Anthony Carter. The death room
and a gurney await him on May 18.
After the school-yard killings in Arkansas, one
Texas legislator proposed a bill that would allow
the execution of those who were 11 when they
committed their crimes.
Back in the late 1980s, the Texas Court of
Criminal Appeals held that a defense attorney who
sleeps during his client's murder trial does not
qualify as "ineffective assistance of legal
counsel." This is the same court that held that
introducing an involuntary confession in a murder
trial was "harmless error" and therefore did not
constitute grounds for reversing a conviction.
Amnesty International issued a 24-page report in
March, "The Death Penalty in Texas: Lethal
Injustice" that condemns the state for the way it
handles capital crime cases. Unfortunately, Texas
is not alone in its execution excesses.
The U.S. Supreme Court is also fevered with the
madness and has been for more than a decade. In
1989, the high court decided that executing John
Paul Penry with a mental age of less than 7 would
not violate the Eighth Amendment's prohibition
against inflicting "cruel and unusual punishment."
The ruling opened death row to numbers of mentally
retarded individuals.
Now Penry faces death at the hands of Texas
prison officials unless his latest appeal
succeeds.
Three mentally retarded convicts were executed
this year so far - in Virginia, Missouri and
Texas.
California is set to execute Horace Edwards
Kelly, a mentally ill convict who believes death
row is a vocational school. There is a temporary
stay on his execution while the state determines
his mental competency.
The high cost of death-row appeals is causing
Florida's court system to go bankrupt trying to
shove murderers into its 75-year-old electric
chair. And on Friday, an Associated Press story
reported that there are allegations that attorneys
paid to represent death-row inmates took wagers in
a "death pool" on who would live and who would
die.
Virginia and Arizona both executed foreign
nationals this month without having informed them
of their rights to speak to officials of their
consulates.
The Vienna Convention on Consular Relations - a
treaty the United States signed to protect its
citizens overseas - demands that right.
Virginia executed Angel Breard, a Paraguayan
citizen, over the objections of his country and the
United Nations' International Court of Justice at
The Hague, Netherlands. Arizona executed Jose
Villafuerte, a Honduran citizen, over the
objections of his country.
We cannot argue that the law demands these
executions for the crime of murder, if we do not
also follow the law. One cannot pick and choose
which law to obey and which to ignore. Any treaty
ratified by two-thirds vote of the Senate is the
law of the land.
At this juncture, according to the Death Penalty
Information Center, there are approximately 70
foreign nationals on death row in the United States
but very few had been informed of their consular
rights before trial.
Our border neighbors, Mexico and Canada, condemn
our thirst for executions. They no longer use the
death penalty.
The world community condemns our blood fever. On
April 3, the United Nations Commission on Human
Rights again approved an Italian resolution calling
for a moratorium on executions worldwide.
Twenty-six nations voted in favor. For the second
time, however, the United States voted against the
resolution. We were joined by China, Rwanda,
Indonesia, South Korea, Sudan, Botswana, Pakistan,
and the Republic of Congo. Such is the company we
keep in our lust for the death penalty.
We are being isolated internationally by our
sickness - quarantined for our execution
excesses.
Last year, the American Bar Association adopted
a resolution calling for a moratorium on the use of
capital punishment until state and federal policies
"ensure that death penalty cases are administered
fairly and impartially, in accordance with due
process, and minimize the risk that innocent
persons may be executed."
On Oct. 20, 1997 the Catholic Bishops of Texas
called for a rejection of the death penalty: "We
believe that capital punishment contributes to a
climate of violence in our state."
And on Feb. 28, the General Assembly of the
Texas Conference of Churches unanimously adopted a
resolution opposing the death penalty.
Iowa Catholic Bishops may have helped defeat an
effort to reinstate the death penalty in their
state earlier this year by their strong
opposition.
And on April 20, Nebraska Gov. Ben Nelson signed
a measure into law that prevents the execution of
those with mental retardation in his state.
Nebraska is the 12th state to adopt such a
law.
Yet state-sanctioned killings continue - at an
increasing rate.
Charles Levendosky, editorial page editor of the
Casper (WY) Star-Tribune, writes frequently on
First Amendment issues. Visit his website:
FACT - First
Amendment Cyber-Tribune
Enrich
Your Life With A Book About Politics & Current
Events
Enrich
Your Life With A Politics & Current Events
Magazine
|
Academy
Showcase Specials
|
|
|
|
|
|
|