Vocational training for particular tasks in the
industrial process should be done by industry
itself and on the job, not by the schools or in
classrooms. The curriculum of basic schooling, from
the first grade through college, should be wholly
liberal and essentially the same for all. In view
of the wide range of abilities and aptitudes with
which the schools have to deal, that curriculum
must be adapted to different children in different
ways.
In other words, we must solve the problem of how
to give all the children -- the least gifted as
well as the most gifted -- the same kind of liberal
education that was given in the past only to the
few. Upon our success in solving that problem the
future of democracy depends. -- Mortimer
Adler
The Paideia
Program
The World of
Work
by James O'Toole
Ours is an advanced, postindustrial economy in
which machines are coming to do most of society's
labor. Most of the "work" that will remain
will be good work -- work that requires human
intelligence, not animal strength.
In such an economy, the skills of reading,
writing, speaking, listening, observing, measuring,
and calculating are essential preparations for any
job youth may want to pursue in the future. In the
fast changing world in which specific vocational
training will be quickly outmoded by technological,
economic, and social advances, the only appropriate
career education is learning how to
learn, so that one can quickly prepare for new
jobs and career opportunities as they come along.
As Robert M. Hutchins once wrote:
If I had a single message for the younger
generation I would say, Get ready for anything,
because anything is what's going to happen. We
don't know what it is, and it's very likely that
whatever it is won't be what we now think it
is.
Since The Paideia Program offers the only
practical preparation for such an unpredictable
future, the general course of study we advocate is
the right preparation for the vocations common to
all: citizenship, the pursuits of leisure,
and earning a living.
As the industries supplying services and
information come to dominate the American economy,
professional, technical, clerical, managerial, and
other service occupations will engage the vast
majority of young Americans who enter the labor
market. Many jobs now require, or will soon
require, advanced schooling. The existing
institutions of higher education are equipped to
provide this advanced professional, managerial, and
technical education. Indeed, it is the kind of
schooling most of these institutions are best
equipped to provide. It is fast becoming the only
kind of schooling that highly specialized faculties
are willing to provide. The existing system of
higher education is thus already geared to the
advanced preparation for work that will be
its prime responsibility as soon as "general"
education is recognized as the responsibility of
basic schooling.
There will, of course, be many graduates of
Paideia schools who will not wish to pursue
advanced training. It is therefore essential that
vocational training should be available to them at
cost-free public institutions, after they
graduate from basic schooling. These institutions
would be staffed by the vocational teachers in the
existing high schools and community colleges, thus
preventing severe dislocations for vocational
teachers or institutions.
The eighteen-year-olds who voluntarily choose to
enter vocational training will be qualitatively
different from today's vocational students: "they
will have had an excellent general education". This
will better serve the ends of equality than any
form of vocational education ever tried.
Differences among social groups will be greatly
reduced when all eighteen-year-olds will have had
the same preparation. Differences in occupations
will remain, but differences in opportunity, class,
and culture will be much less. Vocational educators
will then have a more satisfying role and they will
not be forced to do remedial teaching. Instead,
they will be free to do what they are best prepared
to do and most interested in doing: technical
training and coaching.
Training in the useful arts and crafts is
offered in the first twelve years of Paideia
schooling, but we believe nonetheless that there is
a need for a bridge between schooling and the
working world all students will enter. Most
pressingly, this bridge is needed to help
adolescents understand the nature of the world of
work, which includes the career choices they will
have to face. Consequently, consideration should be
given to providing all students in the twelfth
(last year) of basic schooling with some kind of
work-and-study experience.
This experience might range from volunteer work
in a hospital, to part-time paid work in a factory,
office, newspaper, or government bureau, to
participation in Junior Achievement. What is
fundamental is that young people come to understand
through experience both the necessity for work and
its responsibilities -- the attitudes, habits,
constraints and satisfactions inseparable from
employment. Hundreds of thousands of young
Americans are currently engaged in such informative
activities. In the Paideia curriculum, these
activities should entail no time away from class;
that is, the time spent working should be after
school hours, on weekends, or during the summer
months. From such jobs would follow a number of
educational advantages.
They would help to overcome age segregation
by allowing students to observe adults at work
and, in doing so, to learn what it is like to
work all day.
Students would have the opportunity to
overcome stereotypes about people who perform
kinds of jobs different from their
parents'.
The jobs would enhance the meaning of school
work, because students would see how education
actually contributes to workaday life.
Young people would come to know better what
they really like to do and what they are good at
doing, and thus develop clearer career
aspirations.
Most important, the work experience could be
used to make classroom discussions of social and
economic institutions vivid and individually
relevant.
The shortage of such opportunities for work is,
of course, a practical limitation to this proposal,
which is why we advance it as an option only. But
there is, of course, no limit to the number of
young people who could be engaged in Junior
Achievement activities and, since these are far
more readily malleable to educational ends, they
may be the preferable alternative.
It should also be remembered that apart from
work in the market place, work habits can be formed
by school work and homework. Both are real work and
differ from jobs only in that they are not paid and
that they are done for oneself and not for others.
Homework, especially, should serve to develop
habits of good work. Increased amounts of homework
would reduce the number of hours wasted watching
television; and homework carefully corrected and
repeated if slovenly done, would introduce young
Americans to the routine of hard and exact work to
which West European, Japanese, Chinese and Russian
youth are accustomed at an early age.