|
Make It
A Habit
by Robert Maynard Hutchins
The object of education is the production of
virtue; for virtue is that which makes a man good
and his work good, too. As virtue makes a man and
his work good, so also it makes him happy, for
happiness is activity in accordance with virtue. As
virtue makes a man good and makes him happy, so
also it makes him a good citizen, and this is the
aim of general or liberal education. The four
cardinal virtues are justice, prudence, temperance,
and fortitude, and one description of them is that
they are social virtues, the virtues that good
living in society requires.
The virtues are habits, and are acquired, like
other habits, by doing certain acts. A man becomes
just by doing just acts, temperate by being
temperate, and brave by acting bravely. One cannot
become good merely by listening to lectures on
moral philosophy, any more than one can become a
famous violin player or tennis champion by reading
textbooks. The beginnings of those habits which are
the moral virtues are found in the training
received in childhood. It is unlikely that a
college student can acquire them for the first time
in college; for when he has reached that age he has
already committed so many acts that his habits,
good and bad, are formed.
Nevertheless, habits may be lost, corrupted, or
diminished. The violin player who stops playing and
the tennis champion who stops practicing will soon
fall from their lofty eminence. And though the
moral virtues are among the most durable of all
goods, they, like other habits, may be lost, and
for the same reasons. Thus an educational
institution will wish to confirm and support the
moral virtues of its students and modify their
vices. As we have seen, instruction in how to be
good is not likely to be effective. The students
must act, and act in such a way as to strengthen
their virtues and weaken their vices.
In this effort at some level of education,
instruction in moral philosophy has a part to play.
If the habits formed through training in childhood
are to survive, they must be sustained by reason.
All education swings mound the ancient dictum that
man is a rational animal. He may be trained in
infancy as animals are trained, But as he becomes a
man his reason must understand and approve his
actions; for in the order of human powers reason
rules.
It is here that we see the connection between
the moral and the intellectual virtues. As the
object of the moral virtues is the good, so the
object of the intellectual virtues is the truth.
The moral virtues depend upon prudence, which is
practical wisdom. If a man is to do good actions,
he must do them from choice and not from impulse or
by accident. Correct choice depends on the
determination of the right end and of the right
means of obtaining it. Through the moral virtues
our desires and appetites are perfected so that we
select the proper ends.
The great and specific contribution that a
college or university can make to the development
of virtue is in supplying the rational basis for
it, that is, in developing the intellectual
virtues. Wisdom, science, and understanding, the
three speculative virtues, and prudence, the good
habit of the practical intellect, must be the focus
of a university's educational endeavor. They are
the criterion of teaching and research. The text of
a good course is not whether it is amusing or
informational or seems to contribute to financial
success, any more than the test of a good research
project is whether it is expensive and elaborate
and produces large literary poundage, The real test
of instruction or research is whether it has high
intellectual content and demands intellectual
effort. Otherwise it has no place in a university,
for it cannot assist in forming those habits which
a university education is designed to foster.
If we turn to the production of good citizens,
we see that democracy rests on the assumption that
the citizens will be intelligent. This means that
their education must assist them in learning how to
think and get them into the habit of doing it.
Their intellects must be disciplined. They must
know how to read, to listen, to write, and to
speak. They must have standards of judging
thinking, including their own. They must know the
difference between honest thinking and sophistry
and between reasoning and rationalization. Only by
disciplines that teach them these differences can
they hope to resist the demagogue and the
propagandist.
They must understand, too, the nature of man and
the nature of political society, for otherwise they
will not be good men or good members of a political
society. They must be good and wise in respect to
their own ends and in their relations with other
men, If they are, they will understand that the
good life can be led only in a political society,
and that such a society is an organization designed
to promote the common good. The common good is that
condition of peace, order, and economic sufficiency
which provides happiness for all to the degree to
which they can participate in it. Happiness is
activity in accordance with the moral and
intellectual virtues, that is, good moral and
intellectual habits.
The economic and social injustice of our times
results from the weakness or absence of the moral
and intellectual virtues, which, as we have seen,
are interdependent. Economic and social injustice
does not result from lack of information, lack of
natural resources, or any failure of technology. We
are plentifully supplied with all three. No, the
principal issue of our day is a moral and
intellectual one. The great problems of labor,
capital, the Constitution, the judiciary,
communism, fascism, war and peace revolve around
fundamental questions which every student ought to
face intelligently, questions affecting the ends of
economic activity, of organized society, and of
human life.
Yet it is possible to graduate from many
colleges and universities without being compelled
to face such questions and without the disciplines
which would be needed to face them intelligently.
Higher education must share the blame for the
condition in which we find ourselves.
Robert M. Hutchins (1899-1977) - former
president of the University of Chicago. This
article was first published in April of 1938. Still
timely today.
|