|
THE
PROBLEM OF KNOWLEDGE
A Brief
Introduction to Epistemology
by Jonathan Dolhenty, Ph.D.
PART
SEVEN
- Ideas According to
Their Origin
- Ideas According to
Their Relations
- Ideas According to
Their Comprehension
- Ideas According to
Their Extension
KINDS OF
IDEAS
Ideas can be looked at from different viewpoints
and categorized in different ways. We need to have
a comprehensive understanding of the idea and how
different kinds of ideas function.
Ideas
According to Their Origin
Ideas from the viewpoint of origin can be said
to be intuitive and immediate or abstractive and
mediate.
|
Ideas
According to Their
Origin
|
|
Intuitive
and Immediate
|
or
|
Abstractive
and Mediate
|
Intuitive or immediate
ideas are those which are formed as the result of
the direct perception of things. As we
experience our world our senses are constantly
providing us with sense data. We see objects of all
sorts along with their colors, sounds, smells,
textures, and tastes. All these things make an
impression on our senses. The senses send these
messages to the mind and our intellects form ideas
of these things as we perceive them.
But that is not all. At the same time we can
turn our attention to the mind itself and watch it
form ideas of these things. The intellect also
forms ideas of our minds and its workings because
it can perceive directly its own functioning. We
can, therefore, perceive two worlds around
us&emdash;the physical world we experience through
our senses and the world of thought within us.
All ideas formed of immediately present objects
which we perceive as present to us are called
intuitive ideas.
Abstractive or mediate
ideas are formed of objects by some means other
than their immediate perception. For
example, we form ideas of places, persons, and
things through reading, watching television, and
conversing with other people. We also experience
things like heat from our furnace and light from
our lamp which we know are the result of
electricity. We have an idea of electricity even
though we don't perceive electricity itself but
only its effects.
All ideas formed
through deduction, through a processing of
reasoning, or through a knowledge of some other
thing, are abstractive or mediate
ideas.
Ideas
According to Their Relations
As far as their mutual relations are concerned,
ideas can be either connex or disparate.
|
Ideas
According to Their
Relations
|
|
Connex
|
or
|
Disparate
|
Ideas are connex when
one idea necessarily includes or excludes the
other.
Examples of connex ideas which include each
other are: mother-child, husband-wife,
superior-inferior, teacher-student,
employer-employee, politician-constituent.
Examples of connex ideas which exclude each
other are: day-night, virtue-vice, good-bad,
rich-poor, tall-short.
Ideas are disparate
when they neither necessarily include nor
necessarily exclude each other.
Examples of disparate ideas are: man-black,
wise-good, wheel-wood, rich-famous,
tall-handsome.
A man may be black, but some men are not. A wise
person may be good, but some are not. A wheel may
be made of wood, but it need not be. A person may
be rich and unknown, or famous and poor. A man may
be tall, but he need not be handsome (although he
may be).
As far as their mutual relations are concerned,
ideas can be either identical or diverse.
|
Ideas
According to Their
Relations
|
|
Identical
|
or
|
Diverse
|
Ideas are identical
when their comprehension is the
same.
Examples of identical ideas are: human
being-rational animal, salt-sodium chloride,
dog-sentient living substance, water-two atoms of
hydrogen with one atom of oxygen (H2O).
Ideas are diverse when
their comprehension is different.
Examples of diverse ideas are: human
being-automobile, dog-water lily, house-whale,
gold-ruby.
Furthermore, diverse ideas can be compatible or
incompatible.
|
Diverse
Ideas
|
|
Compatible
|
or
|
Incompatible
|
They are compatible
when the attributes of the comprehension of both
can be united into another or third
idea.
Examples of compatible diverse ideas are: man
and black may be united to form the idea "black
man." Rich and famous may be united to form the
idea "a rich, famous man."
They are incompatible
when the comprehension of one idea excludes the
attributes of the other.
Examples of incompatible diverse ideas are:
virtue-vice, good-bad, light-dark,
green-purple.
The foundation for the incompatibility of ideas
is called the repugnance of ideas and may be of
different kinds. There are four:
- Contradictory
ideas are two ideas of which one expresses the
simple denial of the comprehension of the other.
Examples would be: living-nonliving, good-not
good, being-nonbeing, equal-unequal.
- Privative
ideas are two ideas of which one signifies a
perfection and the other denies a perfection in
a subject which naturally ought to have it.
Examples include: living-dead, healthy-diseased,
sanity-insanity, sight-blindness.
We need to note here the importance of the word
"naturally." A rock, for example, is not supposed
to have life and therefore cannot be said to be
dead. It is merely "lifeless." Trees are not
"blind" because they are not supposed to have
sight. They are "sightless." The idea of
"privative" does not apply in cases where the
subject should not naturally possess the attribute.
There is, then, a middle ground in some cases:
life-lifeless-dead, sight-sightless-blind.
- Contrary
ideas represent the two extremes among objects
of a series belonging to the same class.
Examples of such ideas are: white-black in the
class of colors, wise-foolish in the class of
conduct, happy-miserable in the class of
emotion, hot-cold in the class of
temperature.
Contraries are mutually exclusive and cannot be
true at the same time in the same subject. Between
contraries, however, there is a middle ground and
both contraries may be false at the same time.
Contraries always presuppose a series wherein there
are intermediate stages between one extreme and the
other. Hot and cold in the class of temperature,
for instance, represent the extremes between which
there are various gradations of warmth.
- Relative
ideas are two incompatible ideas united in such
a way that the one cannot be understood without
the other.
For example, take the ideas of mother and child.
These two ideas are mutually incompatible and
exclusive. If you are the mother, you can't be the
child. Now, of course, you are the child of your
mother, but that is another and different
relationship and is not applicable. But you cannot
be the mother and the child within the same
relationship at the same time. In other words, you
can't be your own grandpa! More examples would be:
master-servant, cause-effect, east-west,
left-right.
A knowledge of the
difference among contradictory, privative,
contrary, and relative ideas is important because
if we are certain of the truth of a statement
containing one incompatible idea, we are equally
certain of the falsity of the opposite
statement.
Ideas
According to Their Comprehension
Let's take a look now at ideas from the
viewpoint of their comprehension.
Ideas may be
simple. This
means their comprehension consists of one single
element or attribute. Examples of simple ideas are
"being," "one," and "object." Their comprehension
consists of a single attribute or element.
Ideas may be
composite. This
means their comprehension consists of more than one
element or attribute. Most ideas we have experience
with are composite. Ideas such as house, animal,
billionaire, plumber, child, and so forth are
composed of a number of attributes or elements.
Recall that the idea of "human being" is composed
of substance, body, living, sentient, rational.
Some ideas are
concrete. These
ideas express a nature or determining element as
inherent in a subject. A concrete idea always
represents an object as it is found in reality.
Examples of concrete ideas are: horses, man,
lilies, herons, salmon. These are things in nature.
Other examples are black, blue, sharp, tall, small.
These ideas represent attributes of things in
nature.
Some ideas are
abstract. These
ideas express a nature or determining element
considered by the mind as separated from the
subject in which it inheres. The concrete idea of
"man" becomes an abstract idea when we consider it
by itself as "humanity." "Horse" is a concrete idea
but "horseness" is an abstract idea. "Black" is a
concrete idea but "blackness" is abstract, as are
"sharpness," "tallness," and "smallness."
|
Ideas
From Their
Comprehension
|
|
Simple
|
Composite
|
Concrete
|
Abstract
|
Ideas
According to Their Extension
From the viewpoint of extension, ideas may be
singular, universal, particular, or collective.
Ideas are
singular when they represent a single
object only. Examples are: Thomas Jefferson, my dog
Ming, Socrates. These are known as proper nouns or
names in English. But ideas can also be singular if
the class name is such that it can apply to only
one object. For example: "this hat" is singular
because there can only be one hat in the class of
"this hat." Also, "the President of the United
States" is a singular idea because there is only
one individual within the class.
Ideas are
universal when
they represent some common nature or element which
can be applied to a class as a whole and to each
individual member of that class. The great majority
of ordinary ideas are universal ideas. The idea of
"human being" fits every human being, past,
present, and future. The statement "The dog is an
animal" is as true of my Lhasa Apso, Ming, as it is
of all the dogs that have ever lived or will
live.
Ideas are
particular when
they are universals taken partly and
indeterminately. The singular idea applies to only
one individual. The universal idea applies to each
and all of a class. The particular idea, on the
other hand, applies neither to one nor to all, but
to some of class in an indeterminate manner.
If we can place the word "all" or "every" before
an idea, it is universal. But if we place the word
"some" before an idea, it is particular. For
example: "Human beings are mortal" is the same as
"All human beings are mortal." In this case, "human
beings" is a universal.
If we say "Some human beings are black," we
restrict the universal idea "human beings" to an
indeterminate portion of the whole class of human
beings and we then have a particular idea. While
"human being" may be universal in some statements,
we can make it particular in other statements by
restricting its application only to "some."
Again, we have the possibility of a confusion
here. This is because of our customary use of
ordinary language; a point that has been made
before. Recall the statement about Dutchmen:
"Dutchmen are stubborn." What is meant? All
Dutchmen (universal idea) or just some Dutchmen
(particular idea)? In deciding whether an idea is
to be taken in a universal or particular sense, we
must consider the usage of language and the context
in which the idea appears.
How many useless
arguments have taken place because it was not
determined whether an idea was to be taken as a
universal or as a particular?
A collective
idea is one that applies to all the individuals as
a class but not to the single individual member of
the class. Think of the ideas "army," "troop,"
"herd," "company," and "flock." The idea "army" can
be applied to all the soldiers taken as a class but
no individual member is considered an army. A goose
might be a member of a "flock" but it is not a
"flock" itself.
But be aware. Consider the statement "A library
is a collection of books." "Book" is a universal
idea because the idea applies to each and every
book in the library. But "library" is a collective
idea because it can only be used of all the books
taken together and does not apply to the single
books as such.
Singular, universal,
particular, and collective ideas are important in
arguments and we should clearly understand the
differences among them. The universal ideas,
however, are of most importance and we will discuss
them in more detail next.
|
Ideas
From Their Extension
|
|
Singular
|
Universal
|
Particular
|
Collective
|
PREVIOUS - NEXT
Enrich
Your Life With a Philosophy
Book...
|