|
A Real
Standard of Learning - Part One
by John Boleyn
Is there anything inherent in the current
standard of learning ideal emphasized by the
Virginia Board of Education which actually helps
schools, along with parents and children achieve a
new understanding of learning and education? Will
the students having to undertake these standards
and the other education-reform fads which are
dumped on them help to facilitate their becoming
educated in the course of a lifetime of learning? I
am certainly not going to hold my breath.
This debate seems to be approaching a pivotal
moment in our education process in Virginia, and
across the country. More and more teachers are in a
panic due to teacher shortages in a growing number
school districts, especially in special education.
And in Virginia, the alarm among many teachers has
reached a new level as they have had to devote
additional classroom time to prepare their students
for the new Standards of Learning (SOLs) exams.
The SOLs are the commonwealth's outline for what
kindergarten-through-12th-grade students should
accomplish. The SOL examinations are given in
third, fifth and eighth grades and are used as a
determination of readiness for graduation from high
school.
Many teachers and parents are expressing strong
concern over this process; more time and energy is
required of teachers as an increasing number of
localities find the number of new teachers dropping
each fall. Teachers have had to cut the time needed
to exploring topics in depth because they must
cover a huge volume of material.
Long-standing activities such as junior
literature programs and specific attention to more
intellectually-challenged students have been
consolidated, and recess time has been reduced.
This complicates schooling more than ever. Why? I
know most people view our public and private
schools as student-centered, but they are actually
teacher-centered (and have been for most of
America's educational history). They will become
more so as this process swallows the time of
teachers, parents and kids to serve a so called
standard which measures little, if any learning at
all.
It is the classroom which is the most important
aspect of schooling -- what is being taught and
what is being learned. This is the battleground.
So, should not the classroom revolve around the
teacher as the center point of learning? To suppose
that the teacher is the exclusive cause of learning
is to believe that the activity of a teacher can by
itself suffice to cause learning to occur in
another person even though that person remains
entirely inactive.
Mere teaching or lecturing by teachers is not
necessarily learning on the part of students.
Teaching is a cooperative art meaning the teacher
cooperates or assists the student in the process of
discovery. The teacher doesn't produce knowledge in
the same way a painter creates an object of beauty
or a machinist produces a product of utility.
The only real learning is learning which is the
product of discovery. If genuine learning cannot
occur without activity on the part of the learner
(passive absorption or memorization do not deserve
to be called learning), then we must also recognize
that all learning is process of discovery on the
part of the learner. The teacher and the student
must be active in learning together.
Teachers are tools which aid their students in
the activity of learning; while many times they are
instrumental, they are not the sole cause learning.
And the emphasis on the current SOLs will just
reinforce the typical standard of teaching, which
is reflective of a didactic or lecturing approach.
The quest for excellence in our students will
continue to wither and the attainment of mere
technical competence is yet again esteemed.
A Real
Standard of Learning - Part Two
Mr. Boleyn is a writer in the fields of
education, philosophy and politics.
You can respond to
this essay in The Radical Academy Forum
Enrich
your life or a child's life with an education
book...
Enrich
your life or a child's life with an education
magazine...
|