|
The
Value of Learning
by John Boleyn
I understand why Gov. James Gilmore has
instituted Standards of Learning tests for students
in Virginia. In an era of ever declining academic
performance, there is the need to see their
performance levels increased. And as the chief
executive of the commonwealth, he has the
responsibility to ensure that this problem is
addressed.
But what if the problem is much larger than the
solution of the SOLs? Does our education
establishment know how the skills of learning are
developed in the first place? Obviously, this is
not a problem which can be solved entirely by Gov.
Gilmore or by any Governor whether they are a
Democrat or Republican.
Can the Standards of Learning tests and the
preparation for these tests empower our kids to
learn? The way in which we test or examine students
and the way in which we grade them determines what
teachers teach and how they teach and what students
learn and how they learn.
Unfortunately, most teachers and administrators
do is complain about the SOL process and create
clever catch phrases such "All the SOLs do is cause
us to teach to the test." Yes, there is some truth
to this and as it could apply to the concept of
teaching and testing in both public and private
schools in general. But teachers and educators are
going to have to do a lot better than this.
In Prince William County, administrators plan to
attempt to by-pass their end of year finals
achieving significant result on their SOLs. County
School Superintendent Dr. Edward Kelly believes
that SOL tests should not be the prime measure of a
school's quality. He has instituted several
countywide standards for assessing schools,
including attendance, scores on other standardized
tests and parent satisfaction. The Washington Post
has quoted Dr. Kelly as saying, "Realistically, if
we don't get enough youngsters passing the SOLs,
the diploma isn't going to mean much anyway."
But do these SOLs bring real value to a high
school diploma? And just what should be the
approach to learning in any school system?
Schooling must be general with very little
specialization; liberal, and not vocational. It
must be dedicated to the total human being, not
just to training in specialized techniques. General
learning should be the possession of every
person.
Right now our approach in both public and
private schools is pretty much to indoctrinate
students with information and have them memorize
it. Then they pass it back to their teachers as
learning rather than a process of genuine learning
by acts of thinking and understanding that involve
discovery by the minds of students.
If the information students get is not
understood, then it's opinion, not knowledge.
Opinions adopted on the naked authority of teachers
have no durability, and with memories temporarily
reinforced for tests, these opinions are for the
most part forgotten.
Much more durable are the habits of skill, which
are formed by the kind of teaching which is
coaching, which is more cooperative than lecturing.
Habits are not memories.
Most students passing, at the end of one
academic year, the standardized tests of final
exams or the current SOLs (which are largely tests
based on memorization) would be hard-pressed to
pass the very same tests given without warning at
beginning of next school year.
But if the habitually possessed skills of
students in reading and writing were measured by
the level of their performance at the end of one
and measured in the same way at a later time, I
think little would be lost.
The understanding of ideas and knowledge once
acquired has maximum durability in our lives
because it is habit of the intellect, not something
solely remembered.
Mr. Boleyn is a journalist and writer in
philosophy, ethics and education.
You can respond to
this essay in The Radical Academy Forum
Enrich
your life or a child's life with an education
book...
Enrich
your life or a child's life with an education
magazine...
|