|
September 8, 2006
Creating
Lebanon
Outcomes
of the Conflict
by Eugene E. Narrett, Ph.D.
This essay seeks to outline and briefly discuss
the plusses and negative results of Israel's recent
and unduly limited conflict with Iran in the
Lebanon.
But the title is apposite: the main goal of the
western powers and the perennial
Labor-internationalist regime of Israel in the war,
and a subsidiary goal for Hizballah and its Iranian
commanders was to establish on a firm footing the
artificial state of "Lebanon." This Franco-British
contraption (b.1945) whose very name is Hebrew
denoting a region, "the Lebanon," the three ridge
lines of the Mountains of that name (based on the
Hebrew lavan, "white" for the limestone that
dominates there to levanon, "moon" that
illuminates it).
The fact that securing the artificial
boundaries, and strengthening the dysfunctional,
volatile "army"* of this fake state whose
factionalism pervades it in every feature was near
the top goals of the Israeli regime demonstrates
its suicidal faithlessness and rejection of its own
history, land and integrity.
So assessment of the positive and negative
aspects of this conflict for Israel begins with
recognizing the rack of lies to which the
government bound the nation. The next assault is
visible and hastening toward the Jewish people.
In detailing the good and bad of this bad
business we will present a short list for we need
to focus on essentials. The time of decision draws
near
Positives: Alas, since they are few, we
will start with identifying the good outcomes for
Israel of this lie-based conflict.
Hizballah, a branch of the Iranian Revolutionary
Guard was significantly reduced despite the
confused and weak effort of the Israeli political
and military top tiers (one could call their
'efforts' successful in that they intended to choke
and restrain Israel's military). Hizballah already
is rebuilding (the IDF reports seven major
shipments within two weeks of the "ceasefire,"
a.k.a., hudna) under protection of the UN
and EU, but it was harmed. Moreover, its position
amid the warring factions of diverse peoples and
sects in the Lebanon was greatly complicated and
compromised. Nasrallah has work to do to rebuild
alliances of convenience and to avoid retribution.
Part of this shuffling, at which he excels,
involves dancing between his controllers in Iran
and the various factions in the Lebanon, Shiite,
Sunni, Druse, diverse and competing Christians,
secular and not. It may be that European help,
mediated as usual through the UN is critical for
Nasrallah's survival. But, to stray into bad news
for a moment, his longevity does not alter
Iran-Hizballah's genocidal plans for Israel.
The conflict also exposed and greatly deepened
the rift between the Sunni and Shiite parts of the
Islamic world. Saudi Arabia and Egypt lead the
former; Iran with 'Syria' trailing along for its
own strategic-survival reasons lead the latter. It
is not only the invective between these competitors
that has grown fiercer; the violence in Mesopotamia
is the battleground where it is played out in
blood. This could be a significant plus for Israel
and America and Britain if the leaders of these
nations really wished it to be so, that is, if
their game was not crisis-management. This fact
emphasizes the need of Israel to take preemptive
action to guard itself within defensible, natural
and historic borders.
Best of all, the conflict showed that the great
majority of the nation of Israel retains
enormous courage, self-sacrifice, will to win and
staying power despite decades of
disinformation, demoralization, graft and fatalism
stewed in the socialist oligarchy and its
anti-Jewish concepts and methods.
Positive Alarms:
The rest of the positive aspects for Israel of
the conflict with Hizballah were not good in
themselves but because they revealed grave flaws
within Israel that must be repaired for the nation
to live.
The corrosive effects of Oslo have been exposed
even more vividly than in the previous thirteen
years of massacres, loss of will and purpose. The
faltering and incoherent manner in which military
operations were conducted, or suppressed outright
reveals the spiritual and intellectual rot that
pervades the IDF upper echelons. The officers,
political appointees chosen for obeisance to
Labor's rejection of the birthright, displayed the
defeatism and the phobia about conquering,
occupying, even maneuvering on land at the dark
heart of the Oslo-Road Map scheme. The "desirable
land," the essence of Israel, is feared, like
victory, as a source of problems. "They make good
evil
"
Subsidiary existential problems that were
exposed were the intentional decline in military
readiness and capabilities; the failure, for
example, to manufacture and deploy the THEL
anti-missile laser system that was designed to
interdict rockets like katyushas; the failures of
logistics and supplies, of training...
Exposed was the critical need to occupy, settle
and defend all of Israel's Promised Land
for, in secular reasoning, strategic depth which is
indivisible from integrity in every aspect of life.
If the Lebanon had been incorporated into Israel in
1982 this war would not have happened; Oslo would
not have happened. The German navy would not know
be patrolling the shores off Israel with European
troops massing above the Galilee. If the Lebanon
had been annexed in 1982 there would have been
massive aliyah, economic growth and, with
these, joy and integrity. The nations would have
given up their idea of grinding down Israel through
attrition, peace "agreements," "prisoner exchanges"
(three Jewish soldiers peaceably standing guard for
a thousand murderous criminals), penning in of Jews
and expulsions of them from historic Jewish
land.
Two famous examples of the existential dimension
of this imperative: the raid on Entebbe which
established Israel's deterrent power and resolve in
the face of the nations, established the value of
the life of every single Jew no matter where, was
possible, barely, because Israel still possessed
its land (see my essays on Torah and topography) in
the Sinai peninsula. The cargo planes that made
this mission possible took off from Sharm el Sheik
in the southern Sinai. Now it's a place where
Israeli politicians chat with Muslim potentates
about surrendering more of Promised Land.
The other: the raid on Osirak, another miracle
of readiness, courage, resolve and strategic
brilliance was possible, just barely because the
stripped down F-16s, already burdened with extra
fuel tanks could straddle the border of Jordan --
Saudi Arabia, avoiding radar supplied by Uncle
Laban. This flight path in turn was possible
because in June 1981 Israel still held the eastern
edge of the Sinai where the Etzion air base was
positioned. It is now under Egyptian, or rather al
Qaeda control
And the point is not only that what Israel got
in exchange for its Sinai proved to be very bad; it
had to be: alienation of one's integrity cannot and
will not have good results.
The conflict exposed with particular ugliness
the hostility and prejudice of world media and the
governments that directly or indirectly control
them. It is not an exaggeration to say that for
forty years at least this has been genocidal
slander, justifying the murder of Jews just as
earlier was the suppression or marginalization of
news about the Shoah. Now, nearly a million
Israelis displaced by indiscriminate rocket
barrages are not a humanitarian crisis to the world
(implicitly, the Jews are not human) but the
peoples who sheltered and assisted the barrages
are, even though Hizballah is part of their
government and army both. The addiction of the
powers to their media's sly form of the Final
Solution has rarely been so vivid.
El Al Planes bearing military cargo from the USA
cannot land in Europe but the UN and EU demand that
Beirut's airport be opened to Qatar and other
airlines from states that do not even recognize
Israel, planes carrying unexamined cargo whose
purposes are as clear as the malicious hypocrisy of
the contrast.
This warning should open the eyes of all
Israelis that they must demand and get leaders that
defend and assert their interests and view all
other governments as what they are: enemies.
This conflict exposed beyond any last doubt the
malice and madness of Olmert and all his partners,
most outrageously when he announced that "because
the war [sic] was going so well
[sic] it would enable him to speed ahead
with the convergence [sic] plan" of
expelling more Jews from their homes. Eviction
notices were delivered to towns that had soldiers
fighting at the front.
So the conflict made intensely plain the urgent
need to remove Olmert, Peretz, Peres, Haluz and all
those around and with them and to bar them forever
from public office for they have proved repeatedly
to be fools, quislings and Cossacks.
Negatives:
The bumbling and purposefully crippled manner in
which Israel's political and military echelons
performed caused a massive loss of Israel's first
line of defense: its deterrent power. Despite
clever remarks by Nasrallah and others, the
limpness of the government and confusion in the IDF
has been noted in all nations and insures further
and fiercer attacks. The failures of Kadima-Labor
and the IDF top tier have greatly encouraged jihad,
'Syria,' for example, announced it was forming its
own Hizballah to "take back" the Golan Heights.
This was after Peretz, imitating Olmert, put the
Heights back on the bargaining table as if to say,
'here, take it.'
It is patent that they are following orders from
the Beltway and, through Peres, probably from the
Vatican, too.
The substantial decline in Israel's deterrence
was witnessed as nearly a million Israelis were
displaced for five weeks. Left to the perennial
Labor elites, Jews will become accustomed to living
in shelters and behind walls which continue to be
built despite their ruinous costs, their
indefensibility, and their patent role I creating a
"Palestinian" state in Israel's heart land and
geographic center. It cannot and is not meant to
last. The British drive from Mosul and Basra to the
sea continues with American muscle and suasion.
The loss of deterrence visible during the
conflict already has led to a major spike in
anti-Jewish violence around the world, from
Australia to London to Seattle to Kiev. Attacks in
France, fire-bombing of synagogues, beating and
public threatening of Jews have become common.
Without a quick restoration of Israeli power and
honor, this will worsen rapidly. Things will get
very bad.
The captives were not redeemed unconditionally.
A Fatah 'activist' already has boasted that
"kidnapping Israeli soldiers is not considered
terrorism but [as] military operations with
a big pay-off from the international community."
The promised release of hundreds or thousands of
Muslim assailants of Jews supports this grim
view.
Edom and Ishmael see the writing on the wall:
the worst negative would be if the Jews of Israel
do not, or if they see it but somehow fail to seize
the moment and take down the defeatist regime of
quislings that is leading them to disaster. The
Iranian hammer has been raised for months, indeed
for years but there are no signs that special
operations are underway to cripple the enemy's
various assets in preparation for a saving
preemptive strike. It is plain that the "world
community," America too, is willing to let the
matter drag out until Israel takes a hit. For the
world powers, that will be a two-for: crushing
Israel provides them an [unneeded] excuse
to crush Persia and impose their "New Middle East"
just as the shoah prompted not rescue efforts but
creating the UN whose role since then has been to
push toward another shoah
So the worst negative leads back to the
fundamental positive outcome of this conflict: the
Jews of Israel must recognize the glaring failures
and bad faith of the regime in all its branches and
effect sweeping change before the looming
catastrophe strikes. It's not yet too late for the
nation of Israel to rise like a lion and for its
children return to their borders
* Michael Behe in LibanoScopie a Beirut
French-language journal; Behe also praises the
bravery of Israel and the Jews in doing what
everyone else, the "Lebanese" first should have
done: expel Hizballah, branch of the Iranian
Revolutionary Guard.
Narrett
Archive
Because
The Radical Academy publishes essays and articles
on its website does not imply acceptance or
approval of the comments or opinions expressed by
the author of the material. Nor is the Academy
responsible for any misrepresentation of the facts
included. It is your job to be a critical
reader.
Enrich
your life with a book about politics and current
events...
Enrich
your political & social life with a politics or
news magazine...
|