|
May 15, 2007
Regionalized
World for Killing Fields or Peace and
Prosperity?
by Eugene E. Narrett, Ph.D.
On April 30 President Bush co-signed, with
Angela Merkel, Prime Minister of Germany and a
Spanish EU diplomat a lengthy document applauding
American and European leadership in globalizing
commerce. The document urged increasing integration
of the economies of America and Europe. There were
many lines about lowering trade barriers and
tariffs (less sovereignty for individual states)
and integrating education and medical
protocols.
It seems that America's ruling cadres along with
Germany that leads the EU are pushing harder toward
the regionalized world state championed by the
Round Table, UN ("global security state" -- Kofi
Anan), Trilateral Commission and people as
superficially diverse as Walter Cronkite, Kurt
Waldheim, Hillary Clinton, Richard Nixon, Henry
Kissinger, Mikhail Gorbachev and George H. W.
Bush
George W. Bush is leading America's integration
into a Peace and Prosperity Security Partnership by
dissolving our borders with Mexico and Canada at
the same time that distinctions between America and
Europe/Eurabia are erased. Will Americans be more
secure and more prosperous when this occurs? One
way to judge is by considering the progress toward
the Middle East Free Trade Association also called
"The New Middle East" and in 1919 described simply
by Round Table editor John Dove as "the Arab
Federation, its front door on the
Mediterranean."
There are two geographic bookends to this
entity: let's examine the eastern end first.
Operation Freedom and Democracy in Iraq is a
complex and protracted surgery. Al Qaeda, the
nominally Sunni jihad-umbrella group has been
fighting mostly with Iranian elements against the
members of the Sunni ISI ("Islamic State in Iraq,"
see archives at memri.org) which is straining to
take down the US-backed government headed by Shiite
Abdul Maliki. The northern third of the state has
become a semi-autonomous Kurdish region while the
Shiite majority south, seen by Saddam Hussein in
the 1970s as "a different country; they don't even
speak Arabic," drifts in the eddy of the feckless
and unreliable British presence.
Are American troops there to protect the oil
infrastructure and sustain Britain's project of
binding the oil fields of Mosul to the Persian Gulf
below Basra? And/or are they there to complicate
and keep the violence (intrinsic and endemic in any
case) simmering? Why should our boys undertake
casualty-intensive urban warfare in Baghdad when
history affords no instance that Mesopotamia ever
has been unified except by the imposition of raw
force by one empire or another? Why not stand off
and bomb when jihadists threaten the infrastructure
built and paid by westerners? Why not define
victory as what is good for the American people and
republic?
To date the four big winners are arms
manufacturers; advocates of population reduction;
proponents of the notion that only the UN can
peacefully solve a crisis (the second most hyped
delusion of our era); the regime in Iran who
steadily builds its military and economic outreach
through the fuddling of the western powers and
their enemies of convenience, Russia and China.
(The greatest delusion of our era is the
media-manufactured notion that there is such a
thing as a "Palestinian people." As for UN
"peacekeepers," consult the history of the Congo
[Zaire] in the 1960s and of what UNIFIL did
for Hezbollah in southern Lebanon the past
twenty-five years).
The eastern bookend of the Arab
Federation-NME-MEFTA would be Israel if peace and
prosperity were the goals. In a speech to the House
of Lords in 1923, Sir Alfred Milner stated that the
Jewish areas of "Palestine" would always be
productive and its Arab areas always show a
deficit. Thirteen centuries of history already had
borne out his assessment and has proven it again in
the decades since he spoke. Despite massive
infusion of funds from Europe, the UN, America, the
House of Saud, the mad governments of Israel (which
provide electricity and potable water as well as
work and cash) the Arabs in this area prefer to
murder than build.
If the echelons which dominate the "Oceanic
Commonwealth of English-speaking nations" wanted
peace and prosperity in the western part of MEFTA
they would long since have built Israel into a
nation approximating its Scriptural boundaries and
ordered it to assert itself firmly: they have done
the opposite. All the world powers and associations
intend that Israel and those areas where it should
be are places of endless attrition, ignorance,
poverty and relief works that serve mainly (like
UNRWA) to foment violence.
Israel must never be allowed to win a war or
peace, a lesson dictated by Western diplomats that
Israel's leftist cadres march to as shown in the
"peace" marches of 1982, at Oslo, in summer 2006
and since. It often is forgotten that in 1948, as
during the holocaust, America's top echelons
defeated all attempts to rescue, stood by and
watched and, in 1967 had covert plans to attack
Israel lest it retrieve its heartland.
The latest dictates of the NSC and World Bank to
Israel is that is create a corridor from Gaze
[hence, from Egypt] to the West Bank
[hence Jordan and Iraq] for the free flow
of 'goods' [i.e. weapons]): "free trade"
for prosperity or attrition and dissolution of
Israel?
Since 1920 the powers have hemmed in the Jews
with a plethora of artificial states, lines drawn
in Whitehall, Paris and backed eventually by
Washington and Moscow. The result is one long war,
vivisection with a "security fence" and EU troops
and ships offshore. As for the fence: one's coming
soon at a border near you, -- porous and poor as an
"Amero" that will turn dollars to dolors
This grim picture should not surprise us for it
is consistent with the killing fields of the
abortion industry, the exaltation of contraception
and feminism's redefinition of women's role, -- to
the detriment of the family and life; to the
(usually) killing fields of the divorce industry
and the toxic anti-culturalism of public education,
K-12 and higher. Desolation, death and madness not
productivity, life and continuity are the goals of
the gang.
As Jerusalem re-unification day arrives,
American diplomats lead the world in shunning it
and continue to insist, officially, that Jerusalem
is not a part of Israel at all but as the EU and
Vatican term it, a corpus separatum within
Israel. Banning the Temple Mount to Jews, even as
more evidence of David's and Solomon's ruins are
unearthed daily shows the persistence of the
British plan to internationalize Judaism's city as
part of triumphant Globalism, bloody attrition and
the burial of history.
The facts on the ground suggest that the goals
of the ruling interests are crisis creation and
mis-management, population control and reduction,
and a regionalized world system whose serfs are
kept down by "security measures." The Republicans
push it along; the Democrats come in for the kill
in a nasty geopolitical tag-team.
Be warned Americans: this is the future present
of peace and prosperity partnerships.
Narrett
Archive
Dr.
Eugene Narrett is a writer and teacher in
Massachusetts and is the author of Gathered
Against Jerusalem: Essays on a False
Peace
(Dec. 2000). His book, Israel Awakened: A
Chronicle of the Oslo War (2001), is currently
available at www.1stbooks.com/bookview/7421.
His latest book, WW III: the War on the Jews and
the Rise of the World Security State (2007), is
available at www.lightcatcherbooks.com.
Visit his website at www.israelendtimes.com.
Because
The Radical Academy publishes essays and articles
on its website does not imply acceptance or
approval of the comments or opinions expressed by
the author of the material. Nor is the Academy
responsible for any misrepresentation of the facts
included. It is your job to be a critical
reader.
|
Academy
Showcase Specials
|
|
|
|
|
|
|