|
March 5, 2008
Brutality
toward Veterans
by Eugene E. Narrett, Ph.D.
Some Americans may know of legislation to disarm
Veterans returning from military service as part of
ongoing attempts to negate second amendment rights.
This tendency distinguishes modern dictatorial
regimes that prefer servants to citizens, that
dislike accountability and, perhaps worst, intend
to do things to citizens that might occasion
ordinary decent people to seek justice as supported
by Second Amendment rights.
The following real life horror story relates to
these matters. It was brought to my attention by a
post from the "5301 Club."
The members of this club are working for
America's survival and renewal. Their focus is
Veteran's issues that affect the structure of our
society and all our lives. They take their name
from Federal law, USC, Title 38, 5301(a) (1) that
protects Veterans by reserving for them alone
compensation they earned by sacrifice of their
health during service. The statute reads in part
that these payments are "exempt from
taxation
from the claim of creditors, and
shall not be liable to attachment, levy or seizure
by or under any legal or equitable process
whatever, either before or after receipt by the
beneficiary" [1].
That would seem sufficiently explicit to insure
that the Veteran who paid with part of their health
or mobility would receive this compensation and
that it would "NOT be liable to attachment, levy or
seizure under any legal process whatever." But we
live in "interesting times," these post-Modern days
when words mean whatever the "Master" says they
mean" (as Humpty Dumpty shouted). "Everything is a
social construct" is the today's dogma, -- gender,
the family, a nation, whatever: the Red Queen says,
"off with their heads!" men are utterly expendable
[1]. Not only justice but
even law become impossible when words lose their
meanings and the victim and outcome are designated
before the game begins.
The ultimate 'masters' today are the petty
tyrants of family law in which the guaranteed
winning play is to crush the man even when what's
at stake is a Vet's 5301 disability compensation.
Jere Berry of 5301 notes that Veteran's
disability compensation "is tax exempt, and
uniquely awarded to a single individual based on
their specific disabilities." Nevertheless,
heartless enforcers of the feminist world state, so
long and ruthlessly sought by utopian "social
scientists" and their corporate enablers are using
these payments as "divisible assets in divorce
courts nationwide" (http://www.offe2008.org)
[2]. Men who already
have given chunks of their lives are having their
ability to live the rest of it looted. Not even
Veterans are immune from the tortures of "family
law."
For nearly three decades, ignored by the
corporate controlled media, few Americans have
noticed and fewer acted as feminist ideology has
suffused these courts and many sectors of society.
The goals of this well-financed ideology, explicit
in Marxism and Sociology and fundamental to the
"welfare" state include destroying the family,
gender, the status and reality of fathers so that
women 'marry' the state and its appointed
"care-givers." In due course, via their damaged
kids, they also serve the pharmaceutical-psych
testing and prescribing industry. Criminalizing or
pathologizing normal behavior is a major part of
the new State.
After raging through the general public these
horrors have now attacked even the disability
compensation of Veterans. Primed by presentations
of men as irrelevant and inadequate, the juggernaut
of female-initiated "no-fault" divorce in which the
man is always wrong is enmeshed with many
government programs that reduce the real security
and core unit of society: children with a father
and mother in their own home. First approved in
California under Ronald Reagan, no-fault divorce is
now so entrenched that it assaults the benefits of
disabled veterans; the 'masters' must sense that
Americans are too busy with the pressures of
getting by amid a collapsing economy to notice or
do much to halt the atrocities. And no wonder: when
have you heard a discussion or even a mention of
divorce courts and bias against fathers on the
media? Yet it has ravaged scores of millions of
Americans.
One of many bitter jokes in this aspect of
post-modern, end-game American life is that the
father has little idea, and no de facto ability or
right to know if the "child support" the court
orders them to pay to the mother is actually used
to support the child or children. If a father
pushes to find out he will eventually be punished
but will learn nothing. And yet the "custodial
parent," almost always the mother who almost always
initiates the "no-fault" divorce in which the
father is treated like a criminal but lacks the
protections that law affords to defendants in
criminal cases, receives these monies and alimony
tax free to use as she sees fit. Here is one of the
perversions that characterize our darkening days: a
Veteran that gives his health in national service
has his disability compensation taken at least in
part and given tax free to a spouse or girl friend
who often, in effect, has kidnapped his children
since that too is the reality that no-fault divorce
creates: it not only legalizes but rewards and
exalts maternal kidnapping, desertion of marriage
and theft.
There are several ironies here: let us note just
one that dates to the origin of modern feminism and
still resonates in the media. In A Vindication
of the Rights of Women (1792) Mary
Wollstonecraft argued that marriage was a form of
prostitution in which a woman sold herself in
exchange for maintenance instead of being fully
independent and "equal." That same 'argument,'
disdaining nature, love, loyalty, tradition and the
basic unit of stable and prosperous societies has
been a feminist truism but only in recent decades
with no-fault divorce have we seen the claim
vindicated in a way very different than the
first feminist intended. Since women gained the
right to initiate divorce early in the twentieth
century (and then the right to vote which has not
exactly led to an era of peace, foreign or
domestic, as they claimed, but a state of perpetual
and unnatural wars) they have indeed, with state
sanction made marriage into a form of prostitution.
A woman 'contracts' knowing that whenever she
wishes she can dissolve the 'union' with a phone
call and unsubstantiated claims of "abuse" or of
being "in fear" and then seize the children, home,
and most of whatever other assets there are, even
the disability compensation of a crippled Veteran.
Those who want America destroyed are pleased
because destroying families is another form of
destroying the borders or of integrity in
academics.
Confirmation of this chaos was provided by one
of the talking hairstyles on FOX news. During a
discussion of Paul McCartney's divorce settlement
in which his newly ex-wife secured about $130
million after four years of marriage, a pert blond
commentator boomed out, "well, she earned it!" When
the anchor asked if she realized what she was
saying, she beamed and affirmed her view.
Hurray for feminism, the Nanny State and its
infinite compassion! No-fault divorce has let women
turn marriage into predatory prostitution: men be
damned, children be damned, the family, the nation,
the future all crumble in the mad greed and power
lust of these surpassingly cruel times. Why don't
the candidates of "hope" and "compassion" attend to
these grievances?
This is the context of the terrible situation in
which divorced disabled Veterans find themselves.
Perhaps the horror will rouse people to corrective
action. There still is enough shame in this culture
that few politicians will stand before a parade of
disabled Vets and their supporters protesting these
kinds of abuses.
The 5301 club notes that "most divorce court
judges wrongly treat veteran's disability
compensation the same as military retirement pay."
But it's not: "Military retirement pay is not tax
exempt, and is paid out by the Department of
Defense, not the Department of Veterans Affairs" as
disability benefits are, Berry writes. Yet Veterans
that resist illegal demands to sign away their
dearly earned compensation are charged with
contempt and even jailed. It is cold comfort to
know that it is common for fathers ensnared in
"family law" to be ordered to sign decrees to which
they object, including the divorce filing in the
first place, "or else." The pain of the Veterans
may help shine light into this dark area of
American decay and perhaps fill the cavity.
Club 5301 notes that "disability compensation
should never be considered as an 'asset' in
determining a disabled veteran's net worth" and
thus become part of the kitty to "divide" with an
ex wife. Moreover, "most American taxpayers would
be surprised to learn that millions of tax dollars
they thought were going to pay for
veteran's benefits - were in fact being
diverted to able body non-military ex-spouses in
the form of alimony, or spousal support"
[3] (italics added).
Family courts depend on this psychological
terror, and upon inducing depression and
desperation in the Veteran to get them to sign away
their compensation. They know that they will not be
able to collect it from the VA that "won't give it
to anyone but the disabled veteran that earned the
benefit," the Club adds. Some people blather about
"water-boarding" but ignore this routine torture
and coercion.
Club 5301, whose information campaign is known
as "Operation Firing for Effect" OFFE "has authored
a customized prenuptial agreement for future
disabled veterans to consider before getting
married." Contact their site for information which,
until redress is gained is probably the only way a
veteran can protect his or her potential disability
compensation. Looking further ahead, rallies of
citizens, together with Veterans hurt by this
judicial and illegal tyranny should gather at
Statehouses and newspaper offices demanding that
their grievances be heard and redressed. It also is
seasonable to demand that their concerns be
addressed with specific plans for
remediation by candidates for President, congress
and State legislatures. States in which groups and
efforts are underway include the Carolinas,
Georgia, Alabama, Tennessee, Missouri, New Jersey,
Michigan, Oklahoma, Ohio and Colorado. OFFE invites
inquiries to jerebeery@aol.com.
This matter is an injustice and breach of faith
so glaring that it may be one the politicians will
amend.
Notes:
1. Charles L. Dodgson, Alice's
Adventures in Wonderland (1865) quotes from
Humpty Dumpty and the Queen of Hearts
2. Here is the full text posted by
Club 5301:
to protect disability compensation
from third party awards; USC, Title 38, 5301(a)(1),
Payments of benefits due or to become due under
any law administered by the Secretary shall not be
assignable except to the extent specifically
authorized by law, and such payments made to, or on
account of, a beneficiary shall be exempt from
taxation, shall be exempt from the claim of
creditors, and shall not be liable to attachment,
levy, or seizure by or under any legal or equitable
process whatever, either before or after receipt by
the beneficiary.
3. See http://www.offe2008.org
for quotes and news.
Narrett
Archive
Dr.
Eugene Narrett is a writer and teacher in
Massachusetts and is the author of Gathered
Against Jerusalem: Essays on a False
Peace
(Dec. 2000). His book, Israel Awakened: A
Chronicle of the Oslo War (2001), is currently
available at www.1stbooks.com/bookview/7421.
His latest book, WW III: the War on the Jews and
the Rise of the World Security State (2007), is
available at www.lightcatcherbooks.com.
Visit his website at www.israelendtimes.com.
Because
The Radical Academy publishes essays and articles
on its website does not imply acceptance or
approval of the comments or opinions expressed by
the author of the material. Nor is the Academy
responsible for any misrepresentation of the facts
included. It is your job to be a critical
reader.
|
Academy
Showcase Specials
|
|
|
|
|
|
|