|
July 20, 2007
Ayn
Rand, Libertarianism, and ARI
by Tibor R. Machan, Ph.D.
In
a recent letter to the editor to The Los Angeles
Times, Jeff Britting of the Ayn Rand Institute
writes as follows:
- "Ayn Rand did not write novels of
"uncompromising libertarianism." In her view,
libertarianism has no philosophy to uphold
uncompromisingly. Libertarianism rejects the
need for a consistent, objective, philosophic
defense of liberty and regards politics as
primary. Rand was a defender of reason and
recognized that political freedom requires a
philosophy of reason and egoism. That is why
Rand repeatedly condemned the libertarian
movement, regarding herself, instead, as a
"radical for capitalism." For further
explanation, see Rand's novel of uncompromising
objectivist, not libertarian, ideas - "Atlas
Shrugged" - celebrating its 50th anniversary
this year." (Letters, March 30, 2007)
To appreciate the errors of this letter, first
notice that no libertarian is ever mentioned-the
claims about libertarianism are fabricated.
("Libertarianism rejects" is, of course, nonsense-a
political stance cannot do any rejecting, it is its
advocates or defenders who may.)
As the author of the recent book, Libertarianism
Defended (Ashgate, 2006), I can testify to at least
one libertarian not rejecting "the need for a
consistent, objective, philosophic defense of
liberty...." Moreover, Ayn Rand identified herself
as a libertarian early on and only once some
libertarians disagreed with her on certain issues
did she rather arbitrarily dismiss all of it. Her
dismissal, moreover, was based on a careless
generalization about libertarians, whom she dubbed
"hippies of the right."
In fact, a great many libertarians have reached
their libertarian political conclusions based on
their view that Ayn Rand's Objectivist philosophy
gave this position solid support. Libertarianism is
a political stance, not a full blown philosophy;
this, by the way, is the case with many other
political positions, including those of
Republicans, Democrats, monarchists, or theocrats,
all of which have been defended from a variety of
philosophical viewpoints not every one of which is
successful in giving them adequate support.
Rand, by the way, also called herself a "radical
capitalist" and it is clear that capitalism is also
defended from a variety of philosophical and
religious standpoints. She used to insist that many
of these are hopeless but hers, Objectivism,
achieves what is needed. Well, that is exactly what
she and her epigone should have said about
libertarianism-the Objectivist defense succeeds,
others do not. But, in fact, her politics is every
bit as libertarian as her political economy is
capitalist.
One reason for all this quibbling is, of course,
turf fighting. Those at the Ayn Rand Institute
would like nothing better than having everyone
believe that their way to give support to the fully
free society is the only one worth paying attention
to. Now I happen to agree that Ayn Rand's
Objectivist philosophy is head and shoulders above
other attempts to make the case for libertarianism,
but this does not translate for a moment into
claiming that those at the Ayn Rand Institute are
the only ones who are able to provide such a case.
Rand was a teacher, as were Adam Smith, John Locke,
Ludwig von Mises, F. A. Hayek, and Milton Friedman.
And she had students, some strictly loyal to her
wording of the case for the free society, some more
independent and still fully in accord with her
ideas, and some others more or less heretical. Most
do a creditable job of laying out a case for the
free society-that is to say, for libertarianism.
All this nitpicking about whether Rand was a
libertarian is entirely pointless, in the end, and
only serves dubious, distracting purposes.
Would it not be swell if all these silly
quarrels could be set aside and all those who are
convinced of the value of the free society for
human community life could focus on productive
endeavors instead? Alas, that is perhaps wishing
for human nature to be different from what it is,
which, as Ayn Rand herself taught, is endowed with
free will and thus all too capable of straying from
the right track in all matters, including in how
essentially sound ideas will be defended.
Machan
Archive
Copyright © 2007 Tibor Machan.
Tibor
Richard Machan, Ph.D., professor emeritus in the
department of philosophy at Auburn University,
holds the R. C. Hoiles Chair of Business Ethics and
Free Enterprise at the Argyros School of Business
& Economics at Chapman University in Orange,
California. He is a research fellow at the Hoover
Institution at Stanford University and the Pacific
Research Foundation in San Francisco. Machan is
also an adjunct faculty member of the Ludwig von
Mises Institute and adjunct scholar at the Cato
Institute. Professor Machan is a syndicated and
freelance columnist; author of more than one
hundred scholarly papers and more than thirty
books, including Objectivity:
Recovering Determinate Reality in Philosophy,
Science, and Everyday Life.
You might also enjoy Dr. Machan's new
autobiography:
The
Man Without a Hobby: Adventures of a Gregarious
Egoist, by Tibor R. Machan
A memoir of Tibor Machan, a first generation
refugee who escaped both a political and a personal
tyranny early in his life and embarked upon a
search for an understanding of what it means to
live freely and wisely. The book is a record of the
main events and some interesting tidbits of his
life. Detailed are Professor Machan's reflections,
interpretations, and lamentations of his riskiest
judgments and noteworthy achievements.
More
Books by Dr. Machan in The Academy
Bookstore
Dr. Machan can be reached at: machan@chapman.edu
and machatr@home.com
Because
The Radical Academy publishes essays and articles
on its website does not imply acceptance or
approval of the comments or opinions expressed by
the author of the material. Nor is the Academy
responsible for any misrepresentation of the facts
included. It is your job to be a critical
reader.
Enrich
Your Life With A Book About Politics & Current
Events
|
Academy
Showcase Specials
|
|
|
|
|
|
|