|
Index for this
page...(Be aware some links below may
have expired.)
Posted July 8, 2003
Latest Kelsey Grammer
Lesson
When Kelsey Grammer guest-hosted the Letterman
show, he let the cat out of the bag about the way
conservatives are treated in left-leaning
Hollywood.
In his monologue, he shared with the audience:
"Some of you may or may not know this. I've
recently come out of the closet, actually, in
Hollywood. I'm a Republican, you see. It's a
dangerous thing to do in Hollywood because it means
you are very isolated and lonely."
The actor went on to describe what a small group
of Hollywood Republicans that he hangs out with did
recently for kicks. He quipped, "Last weekend, just
for fun, we kidnapped Michael Moore and gave him a
decent haircut and some clothing."
Grammer also commented on the latest cynical
ploy by Democrats to create a hubbub over not
finding the actual WMDs in a country the size of
California. "John Kerry's been leveling some real
shots at President Bush lately," he said. "I want
you to give them some time
don't forget
they're still looking for O.J.'s weapons."
The "Frasier" star appeared recently on "Fox
& Friends," too, and revealed that he was a
"pro-Bush guy."
(Source: The Left Coast Report by James L.
Hirsen and the staff of NewsMax. If you would like
a subscription, please visit http://NewsMax.com/email.shtml)
Posted July 8, 2003
Alarmed Republicans,
Conservatives Swell ACLU Ranks
Membership in the American Civil Liberties Union
(ACLU) has surged dramatically -- and a large part
of that increase is from conservatives and
Republicans.
That's striking, because conservatives have
traditionally loathed the ACLU. So why the
change?
It's because lots of liberty-minded
conservatives are becoming alarmed that the Bush
administration's draconian anti-terrorism measures
(such as the police-state USA PATRIOT Act) are
threatening the Constitution, the Bill of Rights,
and fundamental American liberties.
So alarmed, in fact, that they're willing to
form unlikely alliances and coalitions in order to
defend those values.
Arch-conservative former U.S. Congressman Bob
Barr (R-GA) is now a consultant for the ACLU. And
the ACLU has formed lobbying alliances with
conservative groups such as the American
Conservative Union, Phyllis Schlafly's Eagle Forum,
and Americans for Tax Reform.
In all, a whopping 100,000 new members have
joined the ACLU since the Sept. 11 attacks. The
ACLU and other observers believe that a large
percentage of those new members are conservatives.
This new conservative support has pushed the ACLU's
membership to an all-time high: 400,000 dues-paying
members.
The new funds have in turn allowed the ACLU to
publicize the Bush administration's war against our
liberties. An example: a new $3.5 television
advertising campaign -- the ACLU's first-ever TV ad
-- has a narrator saying, "Look what (Attorney
General) John Ashcroft is doing to our
Constitution," while hands cross out and cut up the
Constitution and Bill of Rights.
The USA PATRIOT Act and similar Bush
administration measures have "scared a lot of
conservatives," Bob Barr says. "They now recognize
that we do have common ground with the ACLU."
Similarly, David Keene, chairman of the American
Conservative Union, observes: "On the right and
left -- for different reasons and coming from
different places -- there is concern about the
government listening to everyone's phone
conversations and reading people's mail. And when
you share those kinds of concerns with other
people, you damn sure better get together with
them."
Needless to say, conservatives are not embracing
the whole ACLU agenda. Many conservatives remain
horrified at the ACLU's support of gay rights,
abortion rights, gun control and similar
non-conservative positions.
But the police state that Ashcroft and Bush seem
to be busily erecting has scared enough
liberty-minded conservatives to convince them to
make at least a temporary, conditional alliance
with liberals (and libertarians).
And for now, at least, the ACLU has positioned
itself as the biggest and most effective voice
speaking out against the new anti-terrorism
acts.
(Source: Chicago Tribune: http://www.aberdeennews.com/mld/aberdeennews/news/politics/6033039.htm
- and the information was provided by James W.
Harris of the Advocates
for Self-Government. James W. Harris is
co-editor of the Liberator Online. If you wish to
subscribe to the Liberator Online, visit: http://www.self-gov.org/liberator/maintain.html.)
Posted July 8, 2003
Aristotle and Us, by
Christopher Flannery
Are we experiencing a global religious war, a
"clash of civilizations," or "the end of history"?
Does American foreign policy represent a
"Hobbesian" approach to the world in contrast to
Europe's "Kantian" approach? Must we insist upon or
put aside considerations of "good and evil" when we
discuss foreign affairs? Is there such a thing as a
"just war," and if so, what is it, and did we just
wage one?
These questions and others of equal scope have
been forced to the forefront of public debate by
the great events, not only of the past year and a
half but of the past decade and a half. They all
remind us why Aristotle considered the art or
science of politics to be the most comprehensive
and authoritative -- the architectonic -- art or
science.
Politics cannot avoid consideration of first
principles and final ends. It cannot avoid the most
comprehensive questions about human choices and
actions, about human purposes, about the human
good. This is why Aristotle understood practical
wisdom -- the defining virtue of the statesman --
to be the most comprehensive and authoritative
intellectual and moral virtue: the capacity to know
what is good and to know how to do it in the most
complex and momentous situations.
It is the necessity for this understanding of
politics that gave rise 25 years ago to the
Claremont Institute for the Study of Statesmanship
and Political Philosophy.
For signs that Aristotle continues to speak to
prospective statesmen in the English-speaking
world, see the most recent Claremont
Review of Books for Susan D. Collins's
thought-provoking review of a handful of recent
English translations of Aristotle's indispensable
Nicomachean Ethics.
For signs that, when Aristotle speaks, people
listen, see Carnes Lord's review, in the same
issue, of Aristotle and Modern Politics,
where Lord explains Aristotle's "ability to appeal
to self-confessed liberals, libertarians,
communitarians, social democrats, and otherwise
respectable American scholars in search of exits
from various blind alleys of contemporary thought
and practice."
To refresh yourself on the intricacies of
"Just-War Theory," and its applications to our
recent (current?) war, you will not find a more
lucid guide than Michael Uhlmann, who writes on
"The
Uses and Abuses" of the doctrine in the
same action-packed issue.
Aristotle would also without question agree that
the Claremont Review of Books is, in itself,
beautiful, and pleasant to the touch. Please
subscribe, or seek it out at your local
newsstand or bookseller, so that your fingers and
eyes can serve your mind as nature meant them to
do.
(Christopher Flannery is a Professor of
Political Science at Azusa Pacific University, an
associate editor of the Claremont Review of
Books, and a senior fellow of the Claremont
Institute, and this article is archived at
http://www.claremont.org/writings/precepts/030617flannery.html.)
|