|
Index for this
page...(Be aware some links below may
have expired.)
All The Following Items Were Posted On May 1,
2004
Bureauc-rats
Battle Teen -- And Teen Fights Back
Seventeen-year-old entrepreneur Christian Alf
set out to help his neighbors by creating an
after-school business rat-proofing their houses.
His method was simple but effective: he placed wire
mesh over rooftop vents to keep roof-rats out.
It was a good way to make money, and a good way
to help his neighbors, many of them elderly and
plagued by rats.
However, after the Arizona Republic
newspaper ran a story about his business, Christian
quickly found himself battling another, far more
dangerous form of vermin: dictatorial
bureauc-rats.
A complaint was filed with the Arizona
Structural Pest Control Commission, arguing that
young Christian was operating a pest control
business without a license.
It seems that some professional pest control
companies supply a service similar to Christian's
-- but for far more money than the $30 Christian
charged his neighbors. And they apparently didn't
like the competition.
The Commission launched an investigation.
Government agents visited Christian. The state
Commission ordered Christian to shut down his
part-time business -- or face a $1,000 fine.
However, Christian refused to give in. Instead,
he spoke out. And this was such an outrageous case
that the normally apathetic public raised a furor.
The Commission was flooded with letters. Newspaper
columnists fumed and jeered. The case drew national
attention.
The Institute for Justice, a libertarian legal
defense organization, jumped in the fray,
threatening a lawsuit to defend Christian's right
to fight rats without government permission.
After nearly two weeks of this the Commission
gave in, claiming they had never really ordered
Christian to stop in the first place, wishing him
all the best, and so on.
So Christian is back in business, rats are being
thwarted, and all's well. Right?
Well, not quite.
America is plagued with local and state
regulatory bodies that routinely throttle free
enterprise and prevent untold numbers of talented
and hardworking people from entering a great
variety of fields.
These boards and commissions, although they say
they exist to protect the public, actually exist to
protect powerful business interests by limiting and
outlawing competition. And usually the victims
aren't 17-year-olds with stories that can draw such
public and media sympathy. And unfortunately, the
libertarian Institute for Justice can't defend but
a fraction of the cases.
The poor are hit particularly hard by such
boards, which both prohibit them from entering many
fields and keep the price of needed services
artificially high.
There are thousands and thousands of victims
like Christian Alf. Their stories go largely
unheard. Each one is an outrage in a country
founded on the ideals of entrepreneurship and free
enterprise.
Sources:
Arizona Republic - http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/opinions/articles/0331wed1-31.html
Institute for Justice - http://www.ij.org/media/economic_liberty/az_pest_control/3_24_04pr.shtml
IRS
"Help" Spectacularly Wrong
An IRS test audit of 23 tax returns prepared by
IRS employees at IRS assistance centers found that
19 of the 23 were done incorrectly. Further, when
IRS auditors posing as taxpayers asked for answers
to tax questions at the centers, the answers were
right only 69% of the time.
Responding to Congressional criticism of this
appalling failure, IRS Commissioner Mark Everson
said the IRS tried to train its workers adequately,
but "It's a complicated law."
IRS Inspector General Pamela Gardiner
nonetheless told a Congressional committee that the
IRS had made "impressive" improvements in the last
few years in giving accurate tax advice,
particularly at the IRS Web site and in the
toll-free phone service. However, accuracy figures
dropped this year on the phone service, she
admitted, and the vaunted IRS Web site took three
to four days to respond and was wrong one in five
times.
Source:
Knight-Ridder news story -http://www.realcities.com/mld/krwashington/8378961.htm
Billions
of Hours Spent Filling Out Tax Forms
For decades, U.S. politicians have promised to
make taxpaying simpler and less complicated.
The result? The system is more complex, more
costly and more time-consuming than ever
before.
Indeed, during the past decade, federal
tinkering with the Tax Code has added an incredible
"one billion extra hours" to the annual paperwork
burdens on American taxpayers, according to a
comprehensive study of tax complexity conducted by
the non-partisan National Taxpayers Union
(NTU).
"Federal income tax rates have often risen and
fallen, but the complexity of the tax system itself
has almost always gone in one direction --
upwards," said study author David Keating. "Even
though paying taxes is still the biggest pain for
Americans, the very process of filing taxes has
become a major headache in itself."
Among the study's findings:
- It now takes the average American 28 hours
and 30 minutes to prepare the 1040 "long" form
with the three common Schedules A, B, and D, an
increase of 34% since 1995. The 1040A, or
"short" form, along with the common Schedule 1,
takes nearly as long to prepare (11 hours, 32
minutes) as the long form did just nine years
ago.
- Today's short form, at 48 lines, has double
the number of lines as the 1945 version of the
"standard" 1040 tax return.
- The increase in the tax law's complexity
alone has added roughly 1 billion hours in
annual paperwork burdens over the last 10 years
-- part of the overall IRS-induced paperwork
burden that is currently estimated at a
staggering 6.7 billion hours per year.
- Today, taxpayers must wade through 131 pages
of instructions for the standard 1040 form,
which is more than triple the number in 1975 and
over double the number in 1985, the year before
taxes were "simplified." And these estimates are
probably too low since they ignore the countless
hours spent on tax minimization strategies.
- The growth rate of returns prepared by tax
professionals reached a record 62.1% (as of
April 2 of the current 2003 tax year). Counting
computer-prepared returns, that figure would
rise to 88.4%.
Keating said that complexity is "likely to get
worse before it gets better," because of the
increased number of citizens who will be trapped by
another government tax program run amok, the
"Alternative Minimum Tax" (AMT), a parallel tax
system once aimed at ensuring the wealthy paid a
substantial tax bill. By 2010, as many as 32
million taxpayers could be forced to complete "a
second tax return" for (and pay) the AMT.
Source:
National Taxpayers Union Policy Paper 113
and press release - http://www.ntu.org
(Thanks to James W. Harris of the Advocates
for Self-Government and The Liberator
Online for the above information. If you would like
a free subscription to the Liberator Online, visit:
http://www.self-gov.org/liberator/maintain.html.)
Quote
of the Month
"In our time, political speech and writing are
largely the defense of the indefensible... Thus,
political language has to consist largely of
euphemism, question-begging, and sheer cloudy
vagueness... Political language [is]
designed to make lies sound truthful and murder
respectable." -- George Orwell, "Politics and the
English Language," 1945.
Some
interesting & provocative articles on other
websites
The
True Test - Freedom of association, by Walter
Williams: Suppose you want to deal with me but
I don't want to deal with you. Should I be forced
to? You might ask, "What are you talking
about?"
Some
Doctors Turn to Cash-Only Policies, by REBECCA
COOK, Associated Press Writer: When Chuck
O'Brien visits his doctor, they talk about his
aches and pains, his heart problems and his diet,
but never about his health insurance.
Is
talking about online gambling illegal?, by Jacob
Sullum: According to the U.S. Justice
Department, I may have just committed a felony.
Washington's
Biggest Crime Problem, by William L. Anderson and
Candice E. Jackson: The federal government's
ever-expanding criminal code is an affront to
justice and the Constitution.
A
'social obligation' to give our money to
criminals?, by Vin Suprynowicz: So, is it still
against the law in America to, you know ... break
the law? The answer appears to be: Only for us, not
for them.
U.N.
Plan for Internet Control Tiptoes Forward, by
Cheryl K. Chumley: The difference between these
contrasting regulatory proposals being discussed at
the U.S. federal level versus global echelon, of
course, is congressional representatives are
accountable to their constituents. The members of
the United Nations, primarily anti-American in
ideology and deed, are not.
In
Defense of Carbs, by Linda Johnston, MD, DHt:
As libertarians, we are accustomed to holding
minority or unpopular opinions. We even pride
ourselves on being well and truly out of the
mainstream. With that practice under my belt, I
have no hesitation in publicly declaring another
minority view by standing up in defense of
carbohydrates.
Stomping
on free speech. by John Leo: 'Canada is a
pleasantly authoritarian country," Alan Borovoy,
general counsel of the Canadian Civil Liberties
Association, said a few years ago. An example of
what he means is Bill C-250, a repressive,
anti-free-speech measure that is on the brink of
becoming law in Canada. It would add "sexual
orientation" to the Canadian hate propaganda law,
thus making public criticism of homosexuality a
crime.
As
Usual, the Wrong Question Is Being Asked, by Harry
Browne: Richard Clarke says the Bush
administration was too focused on Iraq to see the
9-11 attack coming. The Bush administration says
Clarke is an opportunistic S.O.B. who once praised
President Bush, but now criticizes Bush in order to
boost sales of Clarke's book. Which one is
correct?
The
destruction of American education, by Alan
Caruba: It is very hard to figure out just how
damaged the overall system is. The news dribbles
out in bits and pieces.
FDR's
Thought Police: Still Alive, Still Censoring, by P.
Gardner Goldsmith: In February, Janet Jackson
and Justin Timberlake famously gave the world a new
perspective on the term "pop music." During the
Superbowl half-time show, Timberlake grabbed the
right bra cup of Jackson's leather outfit, and
exposed her breast to the world. In more ways than
one, it was probably the most exposure Jackson had
gotten for a performance in years.
Why
I Am Not a Conservative, by F. A. Hayek:
Conservatism may often be a useful practical maxim,
but it does not give us any guiding principles
which can influence long-range developments.
Molecular
basis for Mozart effect revealed: New research
has revealed a molecular basis for the "Mozart
effect" -- the observation that a brief stint of
Mozart, but not other music, may improve learning
and memory.
Things
Not Said - Homeland Security and Official Ideology,
by Joseph R. Stromberg: "The Budding US Police
State" - Joseph R. Stromberg on the ideology of
homeland security.
Massachusetts
Town Becomes 300th Jurisdiction to Denounce Patriot
Act, by Jim Lobe: The tiny Martha's Vineyard
hamlet of Tisbury, Massachusetts, this week became
the 300th local or state government to denounce the
USA Patriot Act, even as President George W. Bush
was campaigning for Congress to make the Act
permanent before its expiration next year.
|