|
Index for this
page...(Be aware some links below may
have expired.)
All The Following Items Were Posted On January
1, 2005
The
Philosophers Speak
1. Jonathan Edwards (1703-1758), American
Theologian and Philosopher
- The plain and obvious meaning of the words
freedom and liberty, in common
speech, is power, opportunity, or advantage that
any one has to do as he pleases. Or, in other
words, his being free from hindrance or
impediment in the way of doing, or conducting in
any respect, as he wills. And the contrary to
liberty, whatever name we call that by, is a
person's being hindered or unable to conduct as
he will, or being necessitated to do otherwise.
If this which I have mentioned be the meaning of
the word liberty, in the ordinary use of
language, as I trust that none that has ever
learned to talk and is unprejudiced will deny;
then it will follow that in propriety of speech
neither liberty nor its contrary can properly be
ascribed to any being or thing, but that which
has such a faculty, power or property as is
called will. For that which is possessed of no
such thing as will cannot have any power or
opportunity of doing according to its will, nor
be necessitated to act contrary to its will, nor
be restrained from acting agreeably to it. And
therefore to talk of liberty, or the contrary,
as belonging to the very will itself is not to
speak good sense. ...It is repugnant to reason
to suppose that an act of the will should come
into existence without a cause.
From Enquiry into the Modern Prevailing
Notion of Freedom of Will. More information
about Jonathan
Edwards in the Academy.
2. Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790),
American Patriot and Philosopher
- Freedom from uneasiness is the end of all
our science. ...Pleasure is tht satisfaction
which arises in the mind upon, and is caused by,
the accomplishment of our desires, and by no
other means at all; and those desires being
above shown to be caused by our pains or
uneasiness, it follows that pleasure is wholly
caused by pain and by no other thing at
all.
From A dissertation on Liberty and Necessity,
Pleasure and Pain. More information about
Benjamin
Franklin in the Academy.
3. Thomas Paine (1737-1809), British-born
American Journalist, Essayist, and Philosopher
- If law be bad, it is one thing to oppose the
practice of it, but it is quite a different
thing to expose its errors to reason on its
defects, and to show cause why it should be
repealed, or why another ought to be substituted
in its place. I have always held it an opinion
(making it also my practice) that it is better
to obey a bad law, making use at the same time
of every argument to show its errors and procure
its repeal, than forcibly to violate it; because
the precedent of breaking a bad law might weaken
the force, and lead to a discretionary
violation, of those which are good.
From The Rights of Man. More information
about Thomas
Paine in the Academy.
Story
of the Year for 2004 - Antony Flew Discovers
God?
This may be the biggest news story for
philosophy in 2004, making headlines around the
world and putting not a few philosophers and
scientists in a state of intellectual shock.
British philosopher Antony Flew, one of the world's
most prominent atheists and a promoter of atheism
for over 50 years, has decided that the existence
of God is possible and may even be necessary. Flew,
now 81 and a professor emeritus of philosophy at
the Unviersity of Reading, said that scientific
evidence supports the theory that some sort of
intelligence created the universe and this was the
only explanation for the origin of life. The
announcement regarding Flew's change of mind was
even commented on in Jay Leno's monologue on NBC's
"The Tonight Show." Regarding the "conversion,"
Leno pointed out that after all the man was
81 and probably wasn't taking any chances.
For more on this story see:
Postmodernism
- Philosophical Fad?
The Radical Academy has made it its mission to
critique any philosophy or belief-system that is
UN-Realistic or ANTI-Realistic. This particularly
applies to the various "philosophical fads" which
crop up now and then, are influential for a few
decades or so, and then disappear when they are
seen for what they really are. These fads have
special appeal for the young generation because
they are frequently interpreted as
anti-establishment or the "latest thing" in
philosophical thought. The most recent
philosophical fad is "Deconstructionism," which
also goes under other names such as "Critical
Theory."
According to Edward Younkins, "Many of today's
leading intellectuals are postmodernists who accede
to the ideas of anti-realism, skepticism,
subjectivism, relativism, pragmatism, collectivism,
egalitarianism, altruism, anti-individualism, the
world as conflictual and contradictory, and
emotions, instincts, and feelings as better and
deeper guides to action than reason. The roots of
the above ideas and to postmodernism can be traced
to a number of thinkers including, but not limited
to: Rousseau, Hume, Kant, Hegel, Kierkegaard,
Nietzsche, Marx, Schopenhauer, Wittgenstein,
Fichte, Dewey, Freud, Quine, Popper, Kuhn,
Foucault, and Derrida."
To read the entire article go to: The
Plague of Postmodernism, by Edward
W.Younkins
First-Time
Marijuana Seller Gets 55-Year
Sentence
On November 16, Utah Judge Paul G. Cassell gave
a 22-year sentence to a murderer who beat an
elderly woman to death with a log.
Two hours later, he sentenced nonviolent,
first-time-offender Weldon Angelos, age 24, to 55
years and a day in essence, a life
sentence.
Weldon's crime? Selling a small amount of
marijuana to a Utah undercover policeman.
How was this possible? It was yet another horror
story created by America's savage mandatory minimum
sentencing laws, imposed by Congress during the
"get tough on drugs" mania that seized Congress in
the 1980s.
Angelos wore a small pistol in an ankle holster
when he sold the marijuana. Although he didn't use,
threaten to use, or brandish the weapon, that
triggered the federal mandatory minimum laws, and
sent his sentence skyrocketing.
Angelos' mandatory 55 years is based on three
firearms-related charges: for carrying a gun during
two drug sales and for keeping additional firearms
at his apartment. Federal law require a five-year
mandatory-minimum sentence for the first charge and
a 25-year term for each count thereafter.
Under federal law, Judge Cassell had no choice
but to impose the 55 years.
Cassell is no softie on crime. He's a Bush
appointee, former prosecutor, and death penalty
advocate.
But he was horrified by what the law forced him
to do to Weldon Angelos. So horrified, in fact,
that he wrote a 67-page memorandum denouncing the
mandatory sentencing and asking Bush to commute the
sentence to a more reasonable (in his mind) 18
years.
Under federal law, Judge Cassell noted, an
airplane hijacker would get 24 years. A
bomb-detonating terrorist would get a 19-year
sentence. A three-time child rapist would get 15
years.
"Is there a rational basis for giving Mr.
Angelos more time than the hijacker, the murderer,
the rapist?" Judge Cassell wrote. "To sentence Mr.
Angelos to prison for the rest of his life is
unjust, cruel, and even irrational."
A respected and growing body of individuals and
organizations, from across the political spectrum,
oppose mandatory sentencing laws. A few:
- U.S. Supreme Court Justice William
Rehnquist
- Former attorney general Edwin Meese
- Former FBI director Louis Freeh
- Former drug czar Barry McCaffrey
- The American Bar Association
- The National Association of Veteran Police
Officers
- The National Council of La Raza
- The American Psychological Association
- The National Association of Criminal Defense
Lawyers
- The Federal Courts Study Committee
- The American Civil Liberties Union
- The U.S. Sentencing Commission
- Each of the 11 Federal Judicial
Circuits
The Angelos case is bringing some well-deserved
attention to the horrors and injustice of these
barbaric laws.
But a libertarian analysis of the case goes much
further than that. Two simple questions: Why should
it be a crime to sell marijuana in the first place?
And why should it be illegal to exercise your
Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms while
engaged in peaceful, consensual commercial
activities?
Source: FAMM -- Families Against
Mandatory Minimums at http://www.famm.org/index2.htm
(Thanks to James W. Harris of the Advocates
for Self-Government and The Liberator
Online for the above information. If you would like
a free subscription to the Liberator Online, visit:
http://www.self-gov.org/liberator/maintain.html.)
Culture
of Death
Kidnapped Baby Wasn't a
'Fetus'
The pro-abortion media establishment had a hard
time accurately reporting one of the Christmas
season's saddest stories, the infant who was
kidnapped from her mother's butchered
womb.
As we expected, initial news stories referred to
the abducted "fetus." Yet four days later, even
when tiny Victoria Jo Stinnett was in good physical
health after her ordeal, one wire story again
called her a "fetus."
Does that mean the "journalist" thought it was
still OK to kill Victoria?
No wonder Big Media refuses to understand why
most American voters oppose the horrors of
partial-birth abortion, and why newspapers keep
losing circulation.
Of course, many newspapers and other media have
editorialized that they consider disabled
41-year-old Terri Schiavo deserving of death.
Source: Insider Report from NewsMax.com
(If you are not an e-mail subscriber, get Insider
Report and other breaking news alerts by Clicking
Here.)
China Still Killing Girls
Speaking of infant girls, China's communist
dictatorship indicates that it might be nice and
stop slaughtering them by the millions. Maybe. If
it's in a good mood.
After decades of genocide, Beijing has finally
realized that, golly, it isn't good for a society
to have a shortage of women, which exacerbates a
shortage of children.
"Some Chinese scholars now say the costs of
coping with a rapidly ageing [sic]
population will outweigh the benefits of
maintaining draconian population controls," The
Economist reports.
"In urban China, what is referred to as the
'4-2-1 phenomenon' looms on the horizon: four
grandparents and two only-child parents being
supported by one only child."
Whew. And you thought the U.S. had problems with
Social Security.
Last week, the usually wishy-washy State
Department reported that forced abortions and
infanticide are still rampant and have "perilously
imbalanced boy-girl ratios."
Question: How come America's self-styled
feminists don't squawk about the communists' war
against females?
Source: Insider Report from NewsMax.com
(If you are not an e-mail subscriber, get Insider
Report and other breaking news alerts by Clicking
Here.)
An Obligation to Commit
Suicide?
Anti-euthanasia activists have frequently warned
that one danger of legalizing the practice would be
to create a social atmosphere in which the elderly
and ill would feel obliged to commit suicide.
Advocates on the other side have usually dismissed
such warnings as a scare tactic. Now, however, a
leading proponent of euthanasia and other anti-life
policies in the United Kingdom, has come right out
and said it. UK's "Philosopher Queen" says elderly
and ill have an obligation to commit suicide: "I am
not ashamed to say some lives are more worth living
than others."
Source: LifeSite.net at http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2004/dec/04121406.html
Big
Mouth Margaret Cho's Slap at the
Pope
Remember how on "Saturday Night Live" Sinead
O'Connor tore up a picture of the pope?
Comedian-activist Margaret Cho has one-upped the
smooth-headed singer.
After comparing the presidential race to male
anatomy, Cho unleashed an attack on
Christians.
In an article she wrote for In These Times, Cho
cites the "busy-body 'Christian' people," who
according to the comic, "when they're not preparing
for the Rapture - are trying to make gay people
miserable."
She then started to pummel John Paul II. "The
Pope recently castigated the media for making gays
look normal. Yeah, he's a real good judge of
normal. With the gold dress, and the matching gold
hat, living up in the Vatican with 500 men,
surrounded by the finest antiques in the world. You
go, girl!"
The Left Coast Report thinks maybe Cho is
confused and thinks there's an opening for papal
jester.
(Thanks to The Left Coast Report by James
L. Hirsen and the staff of NewsMax for the above
information. If you would like a free subscription,
please visit http://NewsMax.com/email.shtml)
Quotes
of the Month - Reflections on Voting
"If pigs could vote, the man with the slop
bucket would be elected swineherd every time, no
matter how much slaughtering he did on the side."
-- Orson Scott Card
"Those who cast the votes decide nothing. Those
who count the votes decide everything." -- Josef
Stalin
A
Little of This and a Little of That
A Little Wisdom: There are no short cuts
to any place worth going.
A Little Advice: Don't go through life,
grow through life. -- Eric Butterworth.
A Little Question: How much deeper would
the ocean be without sponges?
A Little Put-Down: For those who
understand, no explanation is needed; For those who
don't, none will do. -- Jerry Lewis.
A Little Proverb: Take the road not taken
- the leaves crunch that much louder!
A Little Reflection: Don't worry about
avoiding temptation. As you grow older, it will
avoid you.
A Little Observation: What makes the
desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a
well.
A Little Humor: My parents keep asking
how school was. It's like saying, "How was that
drive-by shooting?" You don't care how it was,
you're lucky to get out alive!
A Little Quote: "Next to having stout and
friendly comrades, a man is chiefly emboldened by
finding himself well armed in case of need." -- Sir
Walter Scott (1771-1832), The Fortunes of
Nigel (1822).
A Little Definition: Experience is simply
the name we give our mistakes. -- Oscar Wilde.
A Little One-Liner: Success always occurs
in private, and failure in full view.
A Little Quip: You never really learn to
swear until you learn to drive.
Some
interesting & provocative articles on other
websites
The
Logic of Economic Law, by Marcus Verhaegh:
Ludwig von Mises puts forth an account of economic
laws based in logic, not experience. Due in part to
this emphasis on the a priori -- that which is not
dependent on experience for its justification --
Mises has long been viewed as relying upon the
'transcendental' approach of Immanuel Kant.
The
most influential philosopher alive, by Marvin
Olasky: PRINCETON, N.J. -- Republicans are
winning elections, but the long-term problem of the
left dominance within academia remains. Consider,
for example, the influence of Princeton professor
Peter Singer. Many readers may be saying, "Peter
who?" -- but The New York Times, explaining how his
views trickle down through media and academia to
the general populace, noted that "No other living
philosopher has had this kind of influence." The
New England Journal of Medicine said he has had
"more success in effecting changes in acceptable
behavior" than any philosopher since Bertrand
Russell. The New Yorker called him the "most
influential" philosopher alive.
'Mired
in a religious war', By Sam Harris: Perhaps it
is time we thought the unthinkable about Iraq.
Perhaps it is time we considered the possibility
that we will break everything we touch in that
country -- or everything we touch will break
itself. However mixed or misguided our intentions
were in launching this war, we are attempting, at
considerable cost to ourselves, to improve life for
the Iraqi people.
Is
the Bush Administration Certifiable?, by Paul Craig
Roberts: Has President Bush lost his grip on
reality? In his December 1 speech in Halifax, Nova
Scotia, President Bush again declared his intention
to pre-emptively attack "enemies who plot in secret
and set out to murder the innocent and the
unsuspecting." Freedom from terrorism, Bush
declared, will come only through pre-emptive war
against enemies of democracy.
Rumsfeld
vs. the American Soldier - What Rummy's survival
says about Bush's plans for his second term, By
Fred Kaplan: Donald Rumsfeld gave every grunt
in the Army a good reason to hate him today.
Afraid
to look in the moral abyss, By James Carroll:
WHY DON'T we Americans look directly at the war? We
avert our gaze, knowing that the situation in Iraq
grows more desperate by the day. Vaunted
"coalition" efforts to "break the back" of the
"insurgency" have only strengthened it. The
violence among Iraqis would surely qualify as civil
war -- except that only one side is fighting.
Bush's
closed door, by Robert Novak: Rocco
Buttiglione, the internationally esteemed Italian
philosopher and statesman, visited Washington last
week. Doors were opened to this Italian cabinet
member and devout Catholic as a courageous exemplar
of conservative Western ideals against the European
Union's leftist ruling establishment. But one door
was closed to Buttiglione. It was George W. Bush's
door.
Morality's
new champion?, by Brian Tiemann: After watching
Comedy Central and being hammered by liberal
messages, there's nothing Brian Tiemann loves more
than watching a good socially conservative cartoon
like South Park.
Nearly
8 years in prison without a trial, by Phyllis
Schlafly: "I want to go to trial on Monday;
I've been locked up for nearly eight years,"
declared Charles Thomas Sell. "The federal court
has no evidence, they have no witnesses. I want my
trial one week from today. I am not incompetent in
any way, shape or form." His statements rang true
to bystanders attending his hearing on Nov. 22 in
the federal courthouse in St. Louis. Whatever
happened to the right of an accused to have a
speedy trial?
What
Has Bush Learned?, by Joseph Sobran: Freud once
described neurotic behavior as persisting in doing
the very thing that caused the problem in the first
place -- keeping on digging when you're already in
a hole. By that standard, government may be the
most neurotic behavior of all. Some years ago The
Atlantic Monthly ran a long article showing that
government programs to redistribute wealth don't
reduce inequality at all; they leave it about what
it was in the first place. Everyone would be just
as rich or poor if they didn't exist. (Everyone
would also be freer.) Now the Bush administration
has announced that 12,000 more U.S. troops will be
sent to Iraq, swelling the total to 150,000. This
comes after all those boasts about how well the war
was going; but that was before the election.
Odd.
The
face of evolutionary design / evolution as a
religion, by Robert Meyer: Recently I saw some
news segments that featured debate on whether the
teaching of Intelligent Design, should be
curriculum taught along side of evolution in public
school science classes. The individual taking the
side of evolution was cornered at one point,
regarding the origin of matter itself. He repeated
the often heard mantra that the universe and
corresponding matter composing it simply have
always existed. What a classic example of "blind
religious faith," I thought, particularly for
someone who persists in characterizing the issue as
science versus faith.
Applying
Free Market Logic to an Unfree Market, By James H.
Joyner, Jr.: The nation's capital has been
distracted this week by an issue more compelling
than terrorism, the war in Iraq, Social Security
reform, or Bernard Kerik's love life: the fate of
Major League Baseball in D.C. At the 11th hour last
Tuesday evening, the city council approved a
bait-and-switch bill proposed by Chairman Linda W.
Cropp that approved funding for a stadium for the
Washington Nationals, the relocated Montreal Expos,
on the condition that private financing be secured
for half of the cost. Given that the deal Mayor
Anthony Williams signed with MLB was for one
hundred percent public financing, this created a
frenzy.
Israel's
Culture of Martyrdom, by Baruch Kimmerling:
Nations like to imagine themselves as unique, but
one belief they have in common is that it is noble
to die in their name. Death and redemption are the
themes of almost every form of patriotism. In the
case of Israel, however, the connection between
nationalism and death is especially visceral. For
the Jewish state is a nation that emerged from the
ashes of a project of extermination, and that sees
itself as the best defense against the renewal of
violent persecution. Zionism, the state's ruling
ideology, is a triumphal creed shadowed by
death.
Science,
faith need not be opponents, by WALTER
WITSCHEY: Faith matters fill the air every
December. For those who seamlessly weld their faith
and their science into a coherent and holistic
world outlook, life proceeds as usual. For others,
faith and modern science are in direct and painful
conflict. During the past few centuries, science
and faith have been at odds, each claiming the
other was wrong in its views, or irrelevant. Lately
however, serious scholars have explored ways to
engage in dialogue. They say, along with John
Polkinghorne a former president of Queens College
Cambridge, that science and religion have insights
for each other.
Ten
myths about assisted suicide - The flaws in the
arguments for ending lives, by Kevin Yuill: The
campaign for assisted suicide seems to be picking
up a head of steam in the UK, with the Mental
Capacity Bill's stormy passage through the House of
Commons on Tuesday 14 December. It is certainly a
step in the direction of the legalisation of
assisted suicide, despite the protestations of its
defenders. According to some readings of this bill,
a patient may request that he or she is deprived of
food and water in certain circumstances, and a
doctor must obey this request or face a possible
five years in prison. In addition to this, Lord
Joel Joffe's Assisted Dying for the Terminally Ill
Bill is currently under review in the House of
Lords.
Global
warming bombshell - hockey-stick plot used modified
data, by Professor Richard Muller: In the
scientific and political debate over global
warming, the latest wrong piece may be the
"hockey-stick", the famous plot, published by
University of Massachusetts geoscientist Michael
Mann and colleagues. This plot purports to show
that we are now experiencing the warmest climate in
a millennium, and that the earth, after remaining
cool for centuries during the medieval era,
suddenly began to heat up about 100 years ago -
just at the time that the burning of coal and oil
led to an increase in atmospheric levels of carbon
dioxide.
No
peace on Earth during unjust war, BY ANDREW
GREELEY: One reads in the papers that the
Pentagon expects the war in Iraq to continue till
2010. Donald Rumsfeld will not guarantee that it
will be over by 2009. How many dead and maimed
Americans by then? How many sad obituaries? How
many full pages in the papers with pictures of all
the casualties?
The
extinction of deism - Historical riddle solved
& lessons for today, by Fred Hutchison:
Deism had a rapid rise to popularity and an even
more rapid fall into oblivion. The rapid extinction
of the once popular and politically influential
Deism in the early nineteenth century is an old
riddle of history -- which has now been solved by
Avery Cardinal Dulles with important lessons for
today.
The
face of Evolutionary Design - Evolution as a
Religion, by Robert Meyer: Recently I saw some
news segments that featured debate on whether the
teaching of Intelligent Design, should be
curriculum taught along side of evolution in public
school science classes. The individual taking the
side of evolution was cornered at one point,
regarding the origin of matter itself. He repeated
the often heard mantra that the universe and
corresponding matter composing it simply have
always existed. What a classic example of "blind
religious faith," I thought, particularly for
someone who persists in characterizing the issue as
science versus faith.
The
System - Capitalism and its Role in American
Society's Plunge into the Abyss. Parts I, II and
III, by Manuel Valenzuela: For one brief moment
of life, when light enters our eyes for the very
first time, we can claim to be the embodiment of
innocence and human goodness, the essence of human
perfection. It is also the only moment in our lives
we can claim to be free. In birth awakens the
wonderment of humanity, the hope of civilization
and the positive energy of our future. In birth are
we all born unclothed, unmarked and uncorrupted,
and, for at least a second, engendered with the
same promises of ability and opportunity
theoretically endowed to us all. The promise of a
new tomorrow lives in the curious smile and
ever-innocent eyes of tiny humans born in the
today.
|