|
Index for this
page...(Be aware some links below may
have expired.)
All The Following Items Were Posted On May 1,
2005
THE
PHILOSOPHERS SPEAK
1.
Josiah Royce (1855-1916), American Idealist
Philosopher
- If you cannot convince me that there is some
kind of knowable ultimate reality, or if you
cannot convince me that there are certain
absolute values by which I can live my life, I
shall commit psychological suicide. That is,
either convince me that there is "one truth" or
one right way of doing things, or I shall
conclude that everything is meaningless and I
will not try any more.
Read about Josiah
Royce in The Radical Academy.
2.
Francis Bacon (1561-1626), British Empiricist
Philosopher
- The universe is not to be narrowed down to
the limits of the Understanding, -- but the
Understanding must be stretched and enlarged to
take in the image of the Unvierse as it is
discovered.
Read about Francis
Bacon in The Radical Academy.
3.
John Stuart Mill (1806-1873), British
Positivist Philosopher
- Why is a single instance, in some cases,
sufficient for a complete induction, while in
others myriads of concurring instances, without
a single exception known or presumed, go such a
very little way toward establishing a universal
proposition? Whoever can answer this question
knows more of the philosophy of logic than the
wisest of the ancients, and has solved the
problem of Induction.
Read about John
Stuart Mill in The Radical Academy.
4.
William Pepperell Montague (1873-1953),
American Philosopher
- For the sceptic to bewail the fact that we
can know nothing but appearance is as silly as
it would be to bewail the fact that we have
nothing to wear but clothes and nothing to eat
but food.
Read about William
Pepperell Montague in The Radical Academy.
5.
Immanuel Kant (1724-1804), German Idealist
Philosophy
- Things which we see are not by themselves
what we see....It remains completely unknown to
us what the objects may be by themselves and
apart from the receptivity of our senses. We
know nothing but our manner of perceiving
them....
Read about Immanuel
Kant in The Radical Academy.
6.
Alfred North Whitehead (1861-1947), British
Realist Philosopher & Mathematician
- There remains the final reflection, how
shallow, puny, and imperfect are efforts to
sound the depths in the nature of things. In
philosophical discussion, the merest hint of
dogmatic certainty as to finality of statement
is an exhibition of folly.
Read about Alfred
North Whitehead in The Radical Academy.
FOR THE
RECORD
1.
Senate Ponders Police-State National ID
Bill.
Get ready for a national ID -- as early as next
month. In February the U.S. House of
Representatives voted 261-161 to send H.R. 418, the
"REAL ID Act of 2005," to the Senate. All but 8
Republicans supported the bill; three-quarters of
Democrats opposed it. House Republicans then
attached the REAL ID proposal to an
almost-certain-to-pass emergency spending bill for
military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, thus
allowing it to bypass the usual legislative
hearings and debate. The Senate is expected to pass
the bill. And the REAL ID is strongly backed by the
Bush administration. The REAL ID Act essentially
turns state drivers' licenses into national ID
cards, with extraordinary powers. Ominously, the
bill gives authority to the Secretary of Homeland
Security to unilaterally add additional information
requirements.
Here are some details:
- The REAL ID Act would establish a vast
centrally-coordinated national database of ID
holders and their personal information,
including, for starters, name, date of birth,
place of residence, Social Security number,
photograph, physical description and possibly
much more. Far more information could be
required at the Secretary of Homeland Security's
wish.
- The ID would essentially be an internal
passport that would have to be shown before
buying a gun from a dealer, or accessing planes,
trains, national parks, court houses, etc. It
will be impossible to function normally in
America without it.
- The national database would be shared with
Canada and Mexico. "There are no limits on what
happens to the database of sensitive information
on Americans once it leaves the United States
for Canada and Mexico -- or perhaps other
countries," said libertarian Congressman Ron
Paul (R-TX), who denounced the bill in
Congress.
- By calling for the use of "common
machine-readable technology," the REAL ID Act
paves the way for the federal government to
force every state to put radio-frequency
identification (RFID) chips into these ID cards.
As Congressman Ron Paul notes: "This legislation
gives authority to the Secretary of Homeland
Security to expand required information on
driver's licenses, potentially including such
biometric information as retina scans, finger
prints, DNA information, and even Radio
Frequency Identification (RFID) radio tracking
technology. Including such technology as RFID
would mean that the federal government, as well
as the governments of Canada and Mexico, would
know where Americans are at all times of the day
and night."
The REAL ID bill is more than a civil liberties
nightmare. It exposes every American to terrible
accidental or criminal abuse. Even a small
percentage of errors would cause major personal and
social disruption. And the IDs would be
irresistible targets for forgers and identity
thieves.
The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), a
major online civil liberties group, says: "The
Senate needs to be reminded that such proposals
have always been rejected for good reason: our
privacy and civil liberties are at the core of what
it means to be an American citizen."
Want to learn more -- and maybe do something
about it? EFF has created a site where concerned
citizens can get more information and easily send
an email to their senators, expressing their
concerns about the REAL ID proposal:
https://secure.eff.org/site/Advocacy?JServSessionIdr001=85n57gc8b1.app13b&page=UserAction&cmd=display&id=119
Sources:
Thanks to James W. Harris of the Advocates
for Self-Government and The Liberator
Online for the above information. If you would like
a free subscription to the Liberator Online, visit:
http://www.self-gov.org/liberator/maintain.html.
2.
On Florida Self-Defense Law: "Wild West" and
"License to Kill."
A new Florida law simply allows citizens to
"meet force with force" if they "reasonably believe
it is necessary to do so to prevent imminent death
or great bodily harm." But on Tuesday night and
Wednesday morning, the self-defense law prompted
the networks to fire off ridiculously-exaggerated
cliches. With "Wild West?" on screen, Good Morning
America's Jeffrey Kofman asserted that "critics of
the new law say it is going to turn Florida into a
tropical version of the Wild West.
They warn that if someone punches you in
Florida, you will now have the right to shoot and
kill them." Earlier, Diane Sawyer asked whether "if
someone shoves you, that legally you can turn a gun
on them?" She too wanted to know: "Is it turning
Florida into the Wild West?" Over on CNN's American
Morning, Bill Hemmer referred to the "shoot first,
ask questions later" bill as a big on-screen
graphic announced: "Florida's Shoot First' Law."
With "License to Kill?" on screen, the night before
Aaron Brown had framed the story: "Is it a law
promoting self-defense or a license to kill?" CBS's
Bob Schieffer fretted that if during a backyard
argument with a neighbor "I have a feeling that
he's getting ready to shoot me," I can "pull out a
gun and shoot him. And that's OK under this
law?"
Source: Click
Here for More on this Story at The Media Research
Center
3.
From Hollywood: Clooney's Next Movie Exposes
"American Corruption."
This September, Warner Brothers will release
writer/director Stephen Gaghan's "Syriana," part of
Hollywood's next wave of films that will more
directly 'engage' the War on Terror. The film stars
George Clooney and Matt Damon, and takes place just
prior to the first Gulf War.
Details of the film are sketchy, but this report
from a private screening recently surfaced on Ain't
It Cool News:
- It tells a complicated story about oil, the
corruption in American government, and the
Persian Gulf. Clooney and Damon each have their
own story: George as an old school ... Middle
East agent for the CIA and Matt as an oil trader
working for riches in the gulf. Jeffrey Wright
... is a junior lawyer working for an oil
company merging with another one, keeping the
government off their backs. His story is
complicated and murky, but we learn his business
is too, very corrupt.
-
- There's also a young immigrant worker in the
Middle East who gets inspired by a Muslim
radical and ... ends up becoming a suicide
bomber who blows up a tanker in the gulf. ...
Don't know who that young actor was, but his
story is arguably the most moving of the
bunch.
Let us translate:
- Oil companies are bad, government regulation
of oil companies is good.
- Muslim terrorists are tragic, 'complex'
figures who are well intentioned, with good
hearts.
- The first Bush administration was the root
cause of 9/11. Eight intervening years of
Clinton foreign policy had nothing to do with
it.
It's inconceivable that Gaghan -- writer of
"Traffic" and the revisionist "The Alamo" -- will
treat the War on Terror fairly. Conservatives
should be on the watch for "Syriana," and take
Warner Brothers to task for releasing it. For three
years after 9/11, conservatives were told that the
War on Terror was too sensitive a subject to
address through film -- hence the total lack of
movies supporting America after the attacks. With
the passage of time, however, it seems Hollywood is
comfortable enough to reveal it's real feelings
about 9/11 -- and they're consistently
anti-American.
Source: "Hollywood Confidential" by Jason
Apuzzo & Govindini Murty and the staff of
NewsMax. If you would like a free subscription,
please visit http://NewsMax.com/email.shtml.
4.
Ad Puts Los Angeles in Mexico
California billboards have relocated Los Angeles
to south of the border, angering groups fighting
illegal immigration.
According to the L.A. Times the billboards,
touting the virtues of Noticias 62, a
Spanish-language newscast on Los Angeles' KRCA-TV,
show two cable newscasters sitting in front of Los
Angeles' downtown skyline, with "Los Angeles, CA"
printed above.
The "CA" however is crossed out, and "Mexico" is
stamped alongside in bright red letters. Underneath
are the Spanish words, "Tu ciudad. Tu equipo." --
Your city.
"This is almost a poster-board for illegal
immigration," Peter Amundson, a volunteer with the
California Republican Assembly told the Times.
"This is America. We're a land of immigrants --
legal immigrants. This is not Mexico. This is the
United States."
He called the ads "a slap in the face to
Californians and a pretty blatant one."
Members of Americans for Legal Immigration, a
political action committee that targets illegal
immigration, told the Times the ads are offensive.
They posted a photo of a billboard on their
website, prompting angry comments.
"I think it's irresponsible corporate
citizenship to be promoting that type of message,"
Daryl Jurbala, communications director for the
group told the Times. "I don't think it's
responsible for anyone to encourage or reward or
try to make illegal immigrants feel
welcome."
The ad's sponsors defended the message.
Executive Vice President Lenard Liberman told the
Times Noticias 62 was a popular news program in Los
Angeles and noted that people of Mexican descent
made up a large portion of the city.
"We tell the story behind L.A., and we tell the
story behind Mexico," he said. "If they find that
offensive, I'm sorry. But you just have to drive
around L.A. to know that this is a Hispanic
city."
Stuart Fischoff, who teaches media psychology at
Cal State L.A., told the Times the billboard was
like "sticking a finger in your eye" to immigration
reformers. "The joke here is, 'We're taking back
California,' " Fischoff said. "Underneath the joke
is part of the truth."
Note: Los Angeles is still in California and in
no danger of migrating to Mexico, although the
reverse is certainly occurring rapidly.
Source: News Alert from NewsMax.com.
5.
Quote of the Month.
"There is an old saying that philosophy bakes no
bread. It is perhaps equally true that no bread
would ever have been baked without philosophy. For
the art of baking implies a decision on the
philosophical issue of whether life is worthwhile
at all. Bakers may not have often asked themselves
the question in so many words. But philosophy
traditionally has been nothing less than the
attempt to ask and answer, in a formal and
disciplined way, the great questions of life that
ordinary men put to themselves in reflective
moments." Time, January 7, 1966.
ELSEWHERE
ON THE INTERNET
Some interesting & provocative articles
on other websites:
To
What Extent Was Rand a Misesian?, by Bettina B.
Greaves: This year marks the 100th anniversary
of Ayn Rand's birth. Her books sold in the millions
and were most effective in transforming a
generation of readers into ardent anti-communists
and strong capitalists. There is also a connection
between the Austrian School and Rand, as shown by a
new symposium from The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies
(Spring 2005) entitled "Ayn Rand Among the
Austrians."
After
Wojtyla - A "Papal Revolution" for the Third
Millennium, by Sandro Magister: This is the
audacious proposal made by the "party" of Ratzinger
and Ruini. The conclave will decide about it, and
also about what to keep or leave behind of the
deceased pope.
New
Face on Objectivist Flagbearers, by Aaron
Bilger: Last week I had the opportunity to see
Yaron Brook speak. Dr. Brook recently became
president of the Ayn Rand Institute, succeeding
Leonard Peikoff as head of the 'orthodox'
Objectivist organization. I had previously seen
Yaron on a December 2004 O'Reilly Factor
appearance, which was frankly quite disturbing. He
called for increased brutality in Iraq and
'[turning] Fallujah into dust'; almost
unbelievably Bill O'Reilly ended up coming across
as the voice of reason. I could not comprehend how
someone advocating actions so at odds with
Objectivist ethics could now be at the helm of the
most definitive Objectivist organization. Still, to
see him speak seemed a good chance for this
Objectivist to see 1) is Yaron really as crazy
about war as he seems? 2) is he at least solid
elsewhere, and 3) could new ARI leadership mean
more tolerance of other schismed Objectivist groups
or libertarians? Armed with expectations set very
low, I decided to attend his speech, on why America
is losing the war on terror.
The
Breadth and Scope of Libertarianism and the Role of
Student Activism, by Daniel J. D'Amico:
Libertarianism stands apart from mainstream
political debate because it proposes a dramatic
restructuring of current government. In addition to
being marginalized from the political mainstream,
libertarianism is divided within itself. An
individual libertarian can be more specifically
defined by many other titles such as Libertarian v.
libertarian, minarchist v. anarchist,
paleo-libertarian v. left-leaning-libertarian, and
probably more which I am unaware of. But this is
just the beginning; other factions of
libertarianism don't fit so nicely in a counter
position relationship.
Why
Einstein may have got it wrong, by David Adam:
A century after Albert Einstein published his most
famous ideas, physicists will today commemorate the
occasion by trying to demolish one of them.
Astronomers will tell experts gathering at Warwick
University to celebrate the anniversary of the
great man's "miracle year" that the speed of light
- Einstein's unchanging yardstick that underpins
his special theory of relativity - might be slowing
down.
The
New York Times and its Catholic crusade, By
Lisa Fabrizio: When it comes to bashing the
Catholic Church and its pope, the New York Times
has lots of competition. But it has outdone even
itself recently with a little number called,
"Catholics in U.S. Keep Faith, but Live With
Contradictions," a 1,500 word paean to what are
generally known as cafeteria Catholics or, those
who would pick and choose which parts of church
teaching they will embrace or reject.
Generation
Y Embraces Choice, Redefines Religion, by Cheryl
Wetzstein: Most young Americans strongly
believe in having choices, an attitude that is
likely to shape their identification with
traditional religions, a study says. "Generation
Y," born between 1980 and 2000, is "bringing
[media] industries to their knees" by
embracing IPod, TiVo and other technologies that
allow unprecedented consumer choice, said Roger
Bennett, co-founder of Reboot, a Jewish group that
is examining generational issues.
Assassination
intrigue lives on after Pope, By Eric Margolis:
Last week in Italy, as Pope John Paul entered the
final hours of his magnificent life, one of the
20th century's greatest criminal mysteries burst
again to life. A special Italian investigative
parliamentary commission announced it had obtained
compelling evidence the Soviet KGB was indeed
behind the "special task" -- what the secret police
called high-level assassinations -- in Rome that
was the 1981 attempt to kill the Pope.
No
Politics, Please -- We're Spies -- The intelligence
commission's laughable conclusion about the
politicization of the CIA, By Jacob Weisberg:
The report of the Commission on the Intelligence
Capabilities of the United States Regarding Weapons
of Mass Destruction is a government document well
worth reading. With impressive precision, the
commission shows how massive ineptitude at every
spy agency fostered the Bush administration's
mistaken assessment of Iraq's nuclear, biological,
and chemical capabilities.
Feminist,
Homosexual Groups Turn Thumbs Down on New Pope, By
Susan Jones: American Catholics who want major
changes in the church are not happy with the
election of a "hard-line" pope who backs
longstanding Catholic doctrine. The Women's
Ordination Conference, a Catholic feminist
organization working for the ordination of women
priests, said the church desperately needs a
healer, but the cardinals have elected a divider:
"This is another example of how the hierarchy is
out of touch with Catholics in the pews," said Joy
Barnes, executive director of the Women's
Ordination Conference.
The
papacy in a post-political world - How the Pope
became an all-purpose Ethical Prince of
international relations, by Philip Cunliffe:
Even before the ascent of Pope Benedict XVI to the
throne of St Peter, commentators observed that any
new Pope would find it difficult to live up to the
legacy of his predecessor. Judging by the
ostentatious global grief that attended the last
Pope's funeral, John Paul II has come to personify
a new model of global leadership. Leftist
commentators were quick to flag up John Paul's
authoritarianism, by pointing out how his campaign
against world communism led to the suppression of
liberation theology in Latin America and the
rolling back of the liberal legacy of the Second
Vatican Council of the 1960s...
The
Scourge of Earth Day, By Michael Berliner:
Earth Day is here, and with it a grave danger faces
mankind. The danger is not from acid rain, global
warming, smog, or the logging of rain forests, as
environmentalists would have us believe. The danger
to mankind is from environmentalism. The
fundamental goal of environmentalism is not clean
air and clean water; rather, it is the demolition
of technological/industrial civilization.
Environmentalism's goal is not the advancement of
human health, human happiness, and human life;
rather, it is a subhuman world where "nature" is
worshipped like the totem of some primitive
religion.
You
Can Always Tell A Conservative, By Frederick
Smith: I just read the, "You Can Always Tell a
Liberal" piece, found here:
http://www.useless-knowledge.com/1234/apr/article262.html.
To this piece, I say, "Hogwash", or as they say in
these parts, "hogwarsh"! See? Not only can I take a
joke, I can make them too ;) What's more accurate
is that you can tell a Conservative by the fact
they lack complexity and nuance. Rather (to avoid
sounding like a hypocrite), some vocal
Conservatives limit themselves to one dimensional
thinking.
Dead
funny? - New York columnist Matt Taibbi on why he
wrote an infantile pisstake of a dying Pope, by
Brendan O'Neill: Have you heard the one about
the dead Pope, the cocky New York columnist, and
the former President's wife? It goes like this: On
8 March, as Pope John Paul II lay dying in the
Vatican, Matt Taibbi, a columnist for the freesheet
alt-newspaper New York Press and currently
Rolling Stone magazine's Michael Jackson
trial correspondent, penned a piece entitled 'The
52 Funniest Things About the Upcoming Death of the
Pope'. It was emblazoned across the front page of
the New York Press, tantalising readers with
this strapline next to a picture of the Pontiff:
'There's Nothing Funny About This Man Dying... Or
Is There?'
Then
They Came for the Children - Feds Arrest Girls for
Teen Snottiness, by Ted Rall: They've vanished
into the netherworld of a Homeland Security gulag
and their story has already disappeared from the
headlines, but the shocking case of two 16-year-old
girls from New York City arrested a month ago ought
to inspire outrage among every American worthy of
the name. Since the government's reasons for the
girls' imprisonment could apply to virtually any
teenager, it should also spark fear.
Science
and the sages - If science is to discover a 'theory
of everything,' it has to learn to listen to the
world's spiritual masters as well, By Paul
Utukuru: As Albert Einstein said, "Science
without religion is lame. Religion without science
is blind." Einstein also believed that God does not
play dice. This year is the one hundredth
anniversary of the publication of his theory of
relativity, which revolutionized the world of
science. The question as to whether God plays dice
or not has not yet been settled because of the
still irreconcilable features of quantum mechanics
and relativity, but it is fair to say that God does
play hide-and-seek with us, and science and
religion are the main players in the game.
|