|
Index for this
page...
All The Following Items Were Posted On June 1,
2008
FROM THE
MORTIMER ADLER FILE
Sense: This word is used as an
abbreviation of what more accurately should be
designated our human sensitive powers.
The comprehensive enumeration of our sensitive
powers, or what may also be called our powers of
perceptual thought, include sensation itself, both
externally and peripherally. It also includes our
sensitive memory and our imagination.
Since we also have the power of conceptual
thought, it may be asked whether these two sets of
powers cooperate or function independently of each
other. Our intellectual powers are dependent on our
imagination. What in the Middle Ages was called a
phantasm is a necessary but not a sufficient
condition of conceptual thought. That dependence is
a causal dependence.
Purely intellectual activity cannot occur
without some action by our sensitive powers, but
the content of conceptual thought is not affected
by it. We can think conceptually of that which is
not sensible at all, and not imaginable.
The dependence of our sensitive powers upon our
intellects is of a different order. The content of
perceptual thought is always affected by the action
of our intellects simultaneously. Persons who are
conceptually blind in one or another of their
peripheral sense organs can exercise the
conceptually blind sense organ without knowing what
it is they are sensing. They can, for example,
smell a rose that is put under their nose, but not
know that it a rose they are smelling.
What is sometimes called the intellectual
imagination represents the simultaneous activity of
both sensitive and intellectual powers. It is
impossible for us to experience the world around us
as brute animals experience it, with only sensitive
powers and no intellects. For us it is a meaningful
world; for them, it is meaningless.
Source: Adler's
Philosophical Dictionary: 125 Key Terms for the
Philosopher's Lexicon. Have you a copy of
this book in your personal library? If not,
consider getting one. Read Max Weismann's review of
this book by Clicking
Here.
THE
PHILOSOPHERS SPEAK
John
Dewey (1859-1952), American philosopher of
Pragmatism
Among recent American thinkers none commands
greater respect than John Dewey. His philosophy was
no mere product of abstraction; its roots were in
our national history, going back to the colonial
and frontier days, when ideas had to cling close to
every day reality and be tested in application. But
though his philosophy was grounded in the past,
deeper than is customary to believe, it was also
inseparable from the living present. All this can
be readily seen from the following quotation:
- All institutions are educational in the
sense that they operate form attitudes,
dispositions, abilities and disabilities that
constitute a concrete personality. The principle
applies with special force to the school. For it
is the main business of the family and the
school to influence directly the formation and
growth of attitudes and dispositions, emotional,
intellectual and moral. Whether this educative
process is carried on in a predominantly
democratic or non-democratic way becomes,
therefore, a question of transcendent importance
not only for education itself but for its final
effect upon all the interests and activities of
a society that is committed to the democratic
way of life. Hence, if the general tenor of what
I have said about the democratic ideal and
method is anywhere near the truth, it must be
said that the democratic principle requires that
every teacher should have some regular and
organic way in which he can, directly or through
representatives democratically chosen,
participate in the formation of the controlling
aims, methods and materials of the school of
which he is a part.
Source: Problems
of Men, by John Dewey (1946). Read more
about John
Dewey in The Radical Academy.
FOR THE
RECORD
1.
Earth Day: The Doomsayers Were wrong, by James W.
Harris
Another Earth Day (April 22) has come and
gone.
Earth Day is a great time to celebrate our
planet and discuss serious environmental
concerns.
It's also a time to pause and remember that,
during the first Earth Day in 1970, some of the
world's leading (and loudest) environmentalists
were terrifying the public with horrific
predictions of planet-wide doom. Predictions that,
thankfully, were spectacularly wrong.
The Washington Policy Center (WPC), a
free-market think tank, reminds us:
"Most Earth Day predictions turned out to be
stunningly wrong. In 1970, environmentalists said
there would soon be a new ice age and massive
deaths from air pollution. The New York
Times foresaw the extinction of the human race.
Widely-quoted biologist Paul Ehrlich predicted
worldwide starvation by 1975.
"On this Earth Day 2008, new predictions will
again be made about looming environmental disasters
about to strike our planet. If past experience is
any guide, most of these predictions are wrong.
People concerned about our planet's future should
be wary of statements from activists and other
interested groups, so we stay focused on real
environmental concerns, and don't waste time on
fearsome predictions that will never happen."
Here are some examples from 1970, the year of
the first Earth Day, gathered by the Washington
Policy Center:
- "By 1985...air pollution will have reduced
the amount of sunlight reaching the earth by one
half..." -- Life magazine, January
1970.
-
- "...civilization will end within 15 or 30
years unless immediate action is taken against
problems facing mankind..." -- biologist George
Wald, Harvard University, April 19, 1970.
-
- By 1995, "...somewhere between 75 and 85
percent of all the species of living animals
will be extinct..." -- Sen. Gaylord Nelson,
quoting Dr. S. Dillon Ripley, Look
magazine, April 1970.
-
- Because of increased dust, cloud cover and
water vapor "...the planet will cool, the water
vapor will fall and freeze, and a new Ice Age
will be born..." -- Newsweek magazine,
January 26, 1970.
-
- The world will be "...eleven degrees colder
in the year 2000. This is about twice what it
would take to put us into an ice age..." --
Kenneth Watt, speaking at Swarthmore University,
April 19, 1970.
-
- "We are in an environmental crisis which
threatens the survival of this nation, and of
the world as a suitable place of human
habitation..." -- biologist Barry Commoner,
University of Washington, writing in the journal
Environment, April 1970.
-
- "Man must stop pollution and conserve his
resources, not merely to enhance existence but
to save the race from the intolerable
deteriorations and possible extinction..." --
The New York Times editorial, April 20,
1970.
-
- "By 1985, air pollution will have reduced
the amount of sunlight reaching earth by one
half..." -- Life magazine, January
1970.
-
- "Population will inevitably and completely
outstrip whatever small increases in food
supplies we make..." -- Paul Ehrlich, interview
in Mademoiselle magazine, April
1970.
-
- "...air pollution...is certainly going to
take hundreds of thousands of lives in the next
few years alone..." -- Paul Ehrlich, interview
in Mademoiselle magazine, April
1970.
-
- Paul Ehrlich also predicted that in 1973,
200,000 Americans would die from air pollution,
and that by 1980 the life expectancy of
Americans would be 42 years.
-
- "It is already too late to avoid mass
starvation..." -- Earth Day organizer Denis
Hayes, The Living Wilderness, Spring
1970.
-
- "By the year 2000...the entire world, with
the exception of Western Europe, North America
and Australia, will be in famine..." -- Peter
Gunter, North Texas State University, The
Living Wilderness, Spring 1970.
Some of this may seem laughable now, but it was
taken very seriously at the time. Had the nations
of the world followed the prescriptions of these
original Earth Day prophets of doom, it is possible
that millions or even billions of people would have
suffered and died.
The Washington Policy Center notes: "By being
skeptical about routine portents of doom, we can
stay focused on the real threats that face our
planet, and on the reasonable and achievable
actions we as a society can take to meet them."
Today -- as food prices are doubling and food
riots taking place in impoverished nations as a
direct result of the disastrous ethanol scheme
pushed by today's statist doomsayers -- that's a
vital lesson to remember.
Sources: Washington
Policy Center; Washington
Post on the ethanol disaster.
James
W. Harris is the editor of Liberator Online, a
publication of Advocates
for
Self-Government.
His articles have appeared in numerous magazines
and newspapers, and he has been a Finalist for the
Mencken Award, given by the Free Press Association
for "Outstanding Journalism in Support of
Liberty."
2:
Quote For The Month: "On Market
Magic"
"That's the biggest lesson I've learned in 35
years of consumer reporting: The market performs
miracles so routinely that we take it for granted.
Supermarkets provide 30,000 choices at rock-bottom
prices. We take it for granted that when we stick a
piece of plastic in a wall, cash will come out;
that when we give the same plastic to a stranger,
he will rent us a car, and the next month, VISA
will have the accounting correct to the penny. By
contrast, "experts" in government can't even count
the vote accurately. That's why I talk about market
magic." -- libertarian journalist John Stossel.
Source: http://www.creators.com/opinion/john-stossel/market-magic.html.
COUNSELING
CORNER:
The
3-Minute Management Training Course . .
.
Lesson 1 of
4
A man is getting into the shower as his wife is
getting out, when the doorbell rings. She quickly
wraps herself in a towel and runs downstairs.
She opens the door to Fred, the next door
neighbor.
Before she says a word, Fred says, "I'll give
you $800 to drop that towel."
After thinking for a moment, she drops it and
stands naked in front of Fred.
After a few seconds, Fred hands her $800 and
leaves.
Wrapping herself in the towel, as she gets to
the bathroom, her husband asks: "Who was that?"
"It was Fred the next door neighbor," she
replies.
"Great!" the husband says, "did he say anything
about the $800 he owes me?"
Moral of the
story: If you share critical
information pertaining to credit and risk with your
shareholders (and Management team), in time, you
may be in a position to prevent avoidable
exposure.
Lesson 2 of
4
A sales rep, an administration clerk and their
manager are walking to lunch when they find an
antique oil lamp.
They rub it and a Genie pops out.
The Genie says, "I'll give each of you just one
wish."
"Me first, Me first!" says the admin clerk.
"I want to be in the Bahamas , driving a
speedboat, without a care in the world."
Puff! She's gone.
"Me next, Me next!" says the sales rep. "I want
to be in Hawaii , relaxing on the beach with my
personal masseuse, an endless supply of Pina
Coladas and the love of my life,"
Puff! He's gone.
"OK, you're up," the Genie says to the
manager.
The manager says, "I want those two back in the
office after lunch."
Moral of the
story: Always let your boss have the
first say.
Lesson 3 of
4
An eagle was sitting on a tree resting, doing
nothing. A small rabbit saw the eagle and asked
him, "Can I also sit like you and do nothing?"
The eagle answered: "Sure, why not." So, the
rabbit sat on the ground below the eagle and
rested.
All of a sudden, a fox appeared, jumped on the
rabbit and ate it.
Moral of the
story: To be sitting and doing
nothing, you must be sitting very, very high
up.
Lesson 4 of
4
A turkey was chatting with a bull.
"I would love to be able to get to the top of
that tree", sighed the turkey, "but I haven't got
the energy."
Well, why don't you nibble on some of my
droppings?" replied the bull.
"They're packed with nutrients."
The turkey pecked at a lump of dung, and found
it actually gave him enough strength to reach the
lowest branch of the tree. The next day, after
eating some more dung, he reached the second
branch. Finally, after a fourth night, the turkey
was proudly perched at the top of the tree.
He was promptly spotted by a farmer, who shot
him out of the tree.
Moral of the
story: Bullshit might get you to the
top, but it won't keep you there.
This ends the 3-minute
management course, now get back to
work.
A LITTLE
OF THIS & A LITTLE OF THAT
A Little Wisdom: Silence is foolish if we
are wise, but wise if we are foolish.
A Little Advice: Always remember the last
thing you say to people each day. Because what if
it happened to be the last thing you ever get to
say to them?
A Little Put-Down: Calling you stupid
would be an insult to stupid people.
A Little Proverb: A peacock who sits on
his tail is just another turkey.
A Little Question: How does the guy who
drives the snowplow get to work in the
mornings?
A Little Reflection: "No tendency is
quite so strong in human nature as the desire to
lay down rules of conduct for other people." --
William Howard Taft (1857-1930), 27th president of
the United States (1909-13).
A Little Admission: "My luck is so bad
that if I bought a cemetery, people would stop
dying." -- Rodney Dangerfield.
A Little Observation: The most pathetic
person in the world is someone who has sight but
has no vision.
A Little Warning: "Conscience is the
inner voice that warns us somebody is looking." --
H. L. Menckennone.
A Little Definition: TOMORROW -- One of
the greatest labor saving devices of today.
A Little Quote: "Great spirits have
always encountered violent opposition from mediocre
minds." -- Albert Einstein.
ELSEWHERE
ON THE INTERNET
Some interesting & provocative articles
on other websites:
Note
to Science - Philosophy is Your Friend --
Philosopher Robert Delfino offers science an
alternative approach to evaluating evidence., by
Greg Soltis: With its emphasis on evidence and
focus on truth, philosophy provides several paths
for science to follow. Robert Delfino proposes that
the evidence -- not a preconceived understanding of
nature -- should guide science's attempt to
understand and categorize experimental results.
"Our ideas must conform to the world," says
Delfino, a professor of philosophy at St. John's
University's Staten Island campus in New York City.
"We cannot say that the world must conform to our
ideas."
Religion,
science and the third way, by Richard Denton:
In any debate about science and religion, the
American philosopher Dan Dennett has the advantage
of looking uncannily like Charles Darwin. The good
Lord Robert Winston, on the other hand, has the
advantage of being a national treasure. They came
together in the last debate in the Rethink series
mounted by the Guardian and the think tank Agora to
debate the motion that "religion is the greatest
threat to scientific progress and rationality
today".
Selling
God to Science, by Ashley Makar: The United
Church of Christ has begun reaching out to
scientists. Will skeptics trade in their lab coats
for their Sunday best? ... Schaper doesn't
appreciate the arguments -- from atheists and
religious people on either side of the
science-faith divide -- that God is diminished by
science. For her, the fact that Genesis provides
two accounts of how the world came to being (one
cosmological, one more anthrocentric), implies that
one story doesn't reveal the complexities of
creation.
Students
seek truth in philosophy: A professor I knew
once said that, without philosophy, history is
``just one damn thing after another.'' In one way
or another, he's right, and that has helped produce
the unexpected surge in the number of college
students who believe they need to read about
Socrates now and worry about money and careers
later. A New York Times story last week
documented the apparently widespread trend of more
college students majoring in philosophy. The story
cited several examples of universities where the
number of philosophy majors had swollen by as much
as 50 percent or more in the past five years
Responding
to Hitchens - Morality can, but need not, come from
religion, by Brian Lockhart: This week, I
address his statement that religion is immoral.
However, I wish to make a few points before I begin
discussing this sensitive subject. First of all, as
Hitchens describes himself as an anti-theist, I am
not an anti-atheist. Nowhere in my column last week
nor this week will I suggest that atheists need to
undergo a mass conversion. I did not say that we
all must have religion to function and I will not
claim that atheists should become theists.
Help
wanted - Serious thinkers: Once considered an
academic pursuit of little practical value,
philosophy is becoming an increasingly popular
choice of major among university students. This is
good news because it shows the ability to think
critically is still valued. Enrolments in
philosophy programs have been increasing in Canada,
the United Kingdom and the United States for much
of the past decade.
German
philosopher backs Archbishop in Sharia row, by
George Conger: Jurgen Habermas has waded into
the debate on Islam in Europe backing the line
taken by the Archbishop of Canterbury in his Temple
lecture on Shariah law. In the "Dialectics of
Secularisation," the noted German philosopher
argued that Europe must adopt an inclusive,
critical discussion on the role religion plays in
public life through a dialogue in which all parties
cooperate as equals for the purpose of achieving
understanding.
|