|
Index for this
page...
All The Following Items Were Posted On September
1, 2008
FROM
THE MORTIMER ADLER FILE
Progress: The word "progress" is a modern
word. It was not used in the ancient and medieval
world. But what the word signifies did have some
bearing on the philosophy of history that developed
in antiquity and in the Middle Ages.
In the ancient world, one view of the pattern of
human history was that it was cyclical -- an
everlastingly recurrent pattern of growth and
decline.
Another ancient view was that the golden age of
mankind was in the far distant past. Since then
there has been a steady decline.
In his City of God, Augustine tells us
that divine providence operates in the opposite
direction. Man's relation to God will have a
brighter future.
For both Aristotle and Aquinas, no individual
thinker contributes to improvements in thought --
improvements in science and philosophy. By the
collaboration of many, advances are made.
With regard to progress itself, as that is
discussed in modern times, certain questions should
be in everyone's mind. One is the question of
whether there is any progress in human nature --
whether in the course of historical time, human
beings are improved in the traits that all human
beings, as members of the same species, share.
Another basic question is whether such progress
as has been achieved is entirely in human
institutions. If so, the next question to be
considered is whether this institutional progress
is quantitative or meliorative -- whether the
institutional improvements are in the direction of
more and more or in the direction of better and
better.
The facts of history in the last 3,000 years,
and certainly in the last 600, contain many
examples of quantitative progress: the human
population has increased in size; with advances in
medicine, human beings live longer than they once
did; and as scientific knowledge has grown from
century to century, its technological applications
have showered on us more and more instruments that
have been immensely useful. In this century, there
are more scientists alive and working together than
in any previous period.
But the question remains whether the more is
also the better -- whether the progress is
meliorative as well as quantitative. To answer this
question, we must appeal to the fundamental
principles of ethics for the standards of
evaluation. (I recommend a book by Charles Van
Doren entitled The
Idea of Progress [New York: Frederick
A. Praeger, Publishers, 1967], especially Book
Two, Part II, and Appendix, pp. 317-475.)
Source: Adler's
Philosophical Dictionary: 125 Key Terms for the
Philosopher's Lexicon. Have you a copy of
this book in your personal library? If not,
consider getting one. Read Max Weismann's review of
this book by Clicking
Here.
THE
PHILOSOPHERS SPEAK
Ralph
Waldo Emerson (1819-1892), American
Transcendentalist philosopher
Emerson was a widely-read essayist and poet as
well as an influential philosopher in the American
transcendentalist movement. He had settled in
Concord, Massachusetts, which he made into a center
of transcendentalism, and wrote Nature
(1836) which states the movement's main principles,
emphasizing the value of self-reliance and the
God-like nature of human souls. His two volumes of
Essays (1841, 1844) made his reputation.
Emerson will be long remembered, partly for his
thoughts, but mainly for his style. These are
illustrated by the following excerpts:
- The method of nature, who could ever analyze
it? That rushing stream will not stop to be
observed. We can never surprise nature in a
corner; never find the end of a thread, never
tell where to set the first stone. The wholeness
we admire in the order of the world is the
result of infinite distribution. Its smoothness
is the smoothness of the pitch of the cataract.
Its permanence is a perpetual inchoation. Every
natural fact is an emanation, and that from
which it emanates is an emanation also, and from
every emanation is a new emanation. If anything
could stand still, it would be crushed and
dissipated by the torrent it resisted, and if it
were a mind, would be crazed; as insane persons
are those who hold fast to one thought and do
not flow with the course of nature. Not the
cause, but an ever novel effect, nature descends
always from above. It is unbroken obedience.
(The Method of Nature)
-
- God offers to every mind its choice between
truth and repose. Take which you please -- you
can never have both. Between these a pendulum,
man oscillates. He in whom the love of repose
predominates will accept the first creed, the
first philosophy, the first political party he
meets -- most likely his father's. He gets rest,
commodity and reputation; but he shuts the door
of truth. He in whom the love of truth
predominates will keep himself aloof from all
moorings, and afloat. He will abstain from
dogmatism, and recognize all the opposite
negations between which, as walls, his being is
swung. He submits to the inconvenience of
suspense and imperfect opinion, but he is a
candidate for truth, as the other is not, and
respects the highest law of his being.
(Intellect)
Source: Excepted from The Method of
Nature and Intellect, by Ralph Waldo
Emerson. Read more about Ralph
Waldo Emerson in The Radical Academy.
FOR THE
RECORD
1.
Happiness Is Key To Longer Life
Keep humming "Don't Worry Be Happy." The 1980s
New Age-inspired hit got it right. New research
shows being happy can add several years to
life.
"Happiness does not heal, but happiness protects
against falling ill," says Ruut Veenhoven of
Rotterdam's Erasmus University in a study to be
published this month.
After reviewing 30 studies carried out worldwide
over periods ranging from one to 60 years, the
Dutch professor said the effects of happiness on
longevity were "comparable to that of smoking or
not."
That special flair for feeling good, he said,
could lengthen life by between 7.5 and 10
years.
The finding brings a vital new piece to a puzzle
currently being assembled by researchers worldwide
on just what makes us happy -- and on the related
question of why people blessed with material wealth
in developed nations no longer seem satisfied with
their lives.
Once the province of poets or philosophers, the
notions of happiness and satisfaction have been
taken on and dissected, quantified and analyzed in
the last few years by a growing number of highly
serious and respected economists -- some of whom
dub the new field "hedonics," or the study of what
makes life pleasant, or otherwise.
"The idea that there is a state called
happiness, and that we can dependably figure out
what it feels like and how to measure it, is
extremely subversive," says Bill McKibben in his
2007 book Deep
Economy: The Wealth of Communities and the Durable
Future.
"It allows economists to start thinking about
life in richer terms, to stop asking 'What did you
buy?' and to start asking 'Is your life
good?'."
Growth in material wealth adds little to
happiness once buying power hits 10,000 dollars a
year per head, according to such research.
But happiness can be bolstered by friendship and
human community, as well as larger social factors
such as freedom, democracy, effective government
institutions and rule of law.
In Veenhoven's findings, published in the
Journal of Happiness Studies, a scientific
publication founded in 2000, the strongest effect
on longevity was found among a group of US nuns
followed through their adult life -- perhaps
reflecting the feel-good factor from belonging to a
close-knit stress-free community with a sense of
purpose.
Happiness itself, according to the specialists,
is generally accepted as "the overall appreciation
of one's life as a whole," in other words a state
of mind best defined by the person questioned.
Happy people were more inclined to watch their
weight, were more perceptive of symptoms of
illness, tended to be more moderate with smoking
and drinking and generally lived healthier
lives.
They were also more active, more open to the
world, more self-confident, made better choices and
built more social networks.
[Plagnol, Anke C. and Richard A. Easterlin,
"Aspirations, Attainments, and Satisfaction: Life
Cycle Differences Between American Women and Men."
Journal of Happiness Studies; DOI:
10.1007/s10902-008-9106-5.]
Source: Science
Daily
2.
Cost Of Government Day Comes At Last, by James W.
Harris
You've been working hard all year -- for the
State, according to Americans for Tax Reform
(ATR).
"Cost of Government Day" is the name ATR gives
to "the date of the calendar year on which the
average American worker has earned enough gross
income to pay off his or her share of spending and
regulatory burdens imposed by government on the
federal, state and local levels."
This year, Cost of Government Day arrived --
finally -- on July 16. Congratulations -- you can
start working for yourself now.
According to ATR: "Working people must toil on
average 197 days out of the year just to meet all
costs imposed by government.
"In other words, the cost of government consumes
53.9 percent of national income."
This has been a bad year for taxpayers. 2008's
Cost of Government Day falls four days later than
last year.
And it's an excruciating 17 days longer than
2000, when the COGD came on June 29.
Even worse, since 1977, it's the fifth-latest
date ever. Only four times -- in 1982, 1983, 1992,
and 1993 -- has Cost of Government Day fallen later
than July 16.
According to ATR, the reasons why Cost of
Government Day is so late is simple:
"The driving factor for this development is the
fact that all components of the cost of government
-- federal spending, state and local spending, and
regulation -- are now increasing faster than
national income."
Here's a breakdown:
- FEDERAL SPENDING: The average American
worker will have to labor 83.7 days to pay for
federal spending, which is now consuming 22.9
percent of national income.
- STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT SPENDING: The
average American worker must labor 50.5 days to
pay for state and local government
spending.
- COSTS OF REGULATION: The average American
worker must labor 62.6 days this year to cover
the costs of government regulation.
Unfortunately, these expenses continue to grow
faster than the economy. Until advocates of liberty
and small government become effective enough to
change the country's directions, spend-crazy
politicians will continue to bring us ever- later
Cost of Government Days.
The best comment on this mess comes from Dr.
Mark J. Perry in his excellent blog Carpe
Diem:
"Isn't it ironic that we celebrate Independence
Day on July 4 to recognize our rejection of
oppressive British regulation, mercantilism and
taxation, and yet the typical American now works
until the middle of July to pay for Big Government?
In other words, we celebrate our declaration of
independence from the British government in early
July before we are even free from the burden of our
current government!"
Source: Americans
for Tax Reform study
James
W. Harris is the editor of Liberator Online, a
publication of Advocates
for
Self-Government.
His articles have appeared in numerous magazines
and newspapers, and he has been a Finalist for the
Mencken Award, given by the Free Press Association
for "Outstanding Journalism in Support of
Liberty."
3.
Short Takes
A Warning For American Citizens: If you
live in a state bordering Canada or Mexico, you may
soon be given an opportunity to carry a very high
tech item: a remotely readable driver's license.
Designed to identify U.S. citizens as they approach
the nation's borders, the cards are being promoted
by the Department of Homeland Security as a way to
save time and simplify border crossings. But if you
care about your safety and privacy as much as
convenience, you might want to think twice before
signing up. Concerned? Read "How
RFID Tags Could Be Used to Track Unsuspecting
People" in the online version of Scientific
American magazine.
Republicans Prefer Their Drinks Straight
Up: Bartenders in the Minneapolis-St. Paul area
preparing for the GOP convention there in September
might take note of a new survey of the drinking
habits of Republicans and Democrats. Among the
findings of the survey of about 100 bartenders in
the Washington, D.C., area, which were reported by
the Minneapolis-St. Paul Star Tribune: Asked
who is more likely to order a drink straight up, 82
percent of respondents said Republicans, and 14
percent said Democrats; Democrats are more likely
to order a fruity (pink) drink -- they were chosen
by 58 percent of the bartenders, compared to 34
percent for the Republicans; 74 percent of
bartenders said Democrats have the best pick-up
lines, and just 14 percent chose Republicans;
Republicans are more likely to arrive first for
happy hour -- but Democrats are more likely to be
the last to go home. The survey was commissioned by
Beam Global Spirits & Wine Inc., whose
beverages include Jim Beam bourbon and Canadian
Club whisky, in collaboration with Clarus Research
Group. Source: NewsMax
Insider Report
4.
Quote For The Month: Intoxicating
Capitalism
"The richness of the experience with regards to
how capitalism can really make a difference to
address social issues is almost intoxicating." --
David Murphy, CEO of the for-profit, socially and
environmentally conscious Better World Books
company, which sells used books and battles
illiteracy worldwide. Source: an interview
in the Atlanta
Journal-Constitution. [Editor's Note:
The Radical Academy is affiliated with Better World
Books -- it is a part of the Academy Bookstore.
Used
Books, Free Shipping -- Starting from $3.48, 2
Million Used Books in stock, Free Shipping in USA,
$2.97 Worldwide.]
COUNSELING
CORNER: Be tolerant of those just learning
English . . .
Why? Because English is not easy to learn. Just
consider:
1) The bandage was wound around the wound.
2) The farm was used to produce produce.
3) The dump was so full that it had to refuse
more refuse.
4) We must polish the Polish furniture.
5) He could lead if he would get the lead
out.
6) The soldier decided to desert his dessert in
the desert.
7) Since there is no time like the present, he
thought it was time to present the present.
8) A bass was painted on the head of the bass
drum.
9) When shot at, the dove dove into the
bushes.
10) I did not object to the object.
11) The insurance was invalid for the
invalid.
12) There was a row among the oarsmen about how
to row.
13) They were too close to the door to close
it.
14) The buck does funny things when the does are
present.
15) A seamstress and a sewer fell down into a
sewer line.
16) To help with planting, the farmer taught his
sow to sow.
17) The wind was too strong to wind the
sail.
18) Upon seeing the tear in the painting I shed
a tear.
19) I had to subject the subject to a series of
tests.
20) How can I intimate this to my most intimate
friend?
. . . And, by the way, Why doesn't "Buick" rhyme
with "quick"?
A
LITTLE OF THIS & A LITTLE OF
THAT
A Little Wisdom: "The happiness of your
life depends upon the quality of your thoughts:
therefore, guard accordingly." -- Marcus
Aurelius
A Little Advice: Try not to let your mind
wander. It is too small to be out by itself.
A Little Quip: If you look like your
passport picture, you probably need the trip!
A Little Proverb: Patience will come to
those who wait for it.
A Little Question: Why aren't there ever
any GUILTY bystanders?
A Little Reflection: "A friend who cannot
in a pinch remember a thing or two that never
happened is as bad as one who does not know how to
forget." -- Samuel Butler
A Little Admission: My mind is like
lightning. One brilliant flash and it's gone!
A Little Observation: Rome did not create
a great empire by having meetings; they did it by
killing all those who opposed them.
A Little Warning: Beware - The
probability of someone watching you is proportional
to the stupidity of your action.
A Little Definition: An authority
- someone who knows lots of things you couldn't
care less about.
A Little Quote: "When women are depressed
they either eat or go shopping. Men invade another
country." -- Elayne Boosler
A Little Put-Down: Judging from the
behavior of some people...not all jackasses have
tails.
ELSEWHERE
ON THE INTERNET
Some interesting & provocative articles
on other websites:
The
Pope's quest to save Western civilization, by Fred
Hutchison: Pope Benedict XVI has identified
several causes for the intellectual, moral,
cultural, and spiritual decline of the European
civilization. I was thrilled to learn about this
because I have independently come to some of the
same conclusions. Allow me to recapitulate his
conclusions as five theses: . . .
The
State in Denial - Can Scientism Recover Our Moral
Memory?, by Mark Sunwall: Now ever since the
time of Destutt de Tracy (oddly enough, one of
Thomas Jefferson's boon companions) a movement has
been afoot to make science an "ideology" of the
state. Today the process is virtually complete,
unnoticed apart from a few curmudgeons who insist
on the distinction between science and scientism.
Fortunately scientism has not lived up to the
promises of its ideological founders, who were
loath to put any limit on the promises of empirical
research. Does evil exist?
Galileo,
Science, and the Smirking Chimp, by Thomas E. Woods
Jr.: Not long ago, someone at a Web site called
"The Smirking Chimp" saw an episode of my EWTN
series "The Catholic Church: Builder of
Civilization" (based on my book How the Catholic
Church Built Western Civilization) and took me to
task for my comments about Galileo. According to
the Chimpster, my argument was: "Galileo had only a
theory, and not 'ironclad proof' of anything."
In
the quest for 'the God particle,' mystics get a new
machine, by Marty Kaplan: If you listen to what
cosmologists say about the origin of the universe,
you have to put your mind in a place where mystics
also dwell. Just try this on for size: At the
beginning of time, 14 billion years ago, every
single thing that exists in the universe today was
compressed into one single point a zillion times
smaller than the period at the end of this
sentence.
All
About Science, by Alex Bob: Well into the
eighteenth century, science and natural philosophy
were not quite synonymous, but only became so later
with the direct use of what would become known
formally as the scientific method, which was
earlier developed during the Middle Ages and early
modern period in Europe and the Middle East (see
History of scientific method). Prior to the 18th
century, however, the preferred term for the study
of nature was natural philosophy, while English
speakers most typically referred to the study of
the human mind as moral philosophy.
How
to Answer Your Kids' Existential Questions, by Matt
Blum: Thoughtful "Mommy, Daddy...Are we real?"
my daughter asked from the back seat of the car, as
we made our way home. She's nearly six, and she
asked this as if it were a perfectly ordinary
question. "Um..." My wife and I glanced at each
other and shrugged. "What do you mean, sweetheart?"
I asked. She clarified: "Could we just be
characters in a story?" My son, seven-and-a-half,
piped up and reiterated the original question:
"Yeah, are we real?" And so began a deep
philosophical discussion, the first I've ever been
in with participants under the age of eight.
Berlinski
Answers the New Atheists: "The attack on
traditional religious thought," writes David
Berlinski in The Devil's Delusion, "marks
the consolidation in our time of science as the
single system of belief in which rational men and
women might place their faith, and if not their
faith, then certainly their devotion." David
Berlinski, mathematician and philosopher, skeptic
and iconoclast, in his latest book The Devil's
Delusion provides a counterpoint to the several
New Atheists authors that have published works in
the past few years, Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris,
Daniel Dennett, and Christopher Hitchens most
notably. Berlinski, a secular Jew, has no quarrel
with scientific pursuits but is skeptical of the
claim by many scientists that they can answer, with
authority, essentially scientifically unanswerable
questions.
'Experimental
philosophy' takes new approach, by Matt Dees:
The fledgling academic movement known as
"experimental philosophy" has a fitting symbol: an
armchair in flames. Sitting around mulling the
human condition lacks relevance, say adherents to
the movement, which has taken root in just the past
few years. Experimental philosophy revitalizes the
notion that understanding how people think is as
important as pondering what people should
think.
Wilfred
Sellars and Marxism, by Thomas Riggins:
Briefly, Sellars was an analytic philosopher, a
member of a school stemming back over a hundred
years, that grew out of the rejection of the
European philosophical tradition growing out of
German Idealism, especially Kant and Hegel. Marxism
also grew out of this German tradition. Recently
some analytic philosophers have come to believe
that the wholesale rejection of Hegel and others in
the classical tradition has been a mistake and was
based on a faulty understanding of their works by
some of the founders of the analytic movement,
especially Bertrand Russell.
'Moral
anarchy', by GH Arinday Jr.: In his "Critique
of Pure Reason", German philosopher Immanuel Kant,
whose transcendental philosophy has tremendously
recast the whole legal philosophy particularly
those in the teleological realm, posited the view
that "the righteous man can attain freedom" if he
liberates himself "from the arbitrary power of his
senses and from enslavement to his emotions".
Simply put, the free will of the individual must
blend or agree with the free will of the
majority.
"Philosophy
begins in wonder": Plato's position as the
father of Western philosophy is unchallenged. AN
Whitehead called European philosophy "a series of
footnotes to Plato", while Hegel claimed that Plato
constituted an "epoch in philosophical history".
Though he was not the first to grapple with
questions such as 'what is the world?', 'how do we
know about the world?', 'how ought we to live?' and
'how should society be organised?', he tackled them
in such a powerful way that he could almost be said
to have invented the subject.
|