|
Index for this
page...
All The Following Items Were Posted On March 1,
2009
FROM
THE MORTIMER ADLER FILE
Duty: The word "duty" is used in
philosophy as a synonym for moral obligation. As so
used it requires us to understand wrong and right
uses of the phrase "categorical imperatives."
Immanuel Kant's use of that phrase is an instance
of extreme rationalism in moral philosophy.
[See
Dr. Adler's discussion of "Casuistry" in the
Archive.] A truly categorical imperative is
one that is self-evident. It is derived from the
understanding of prescription truth.
All the main propositions of moral philosophy
are prescriptive rather then descriptive. They are
statements of what ought or ought not to be sought
and done. In short, they are statements of our
moral obligations and duties.
The one categorical imperative is that we ought
to seek everything that is really good for us, and
nothing else. Seeking goods that are merely
apparent good is permissible, but not
obligatory.
The categorical imperative, or first principle
of moral philosophy, is self-evident. It is
impossible to think that we ought not to seek what
is really good for us, or that we ought to seek
what is really bad for us. The words "really good"
and "really bad" complicate the words "ought" and
"ought not."
If a moral philosophy is formulated entirely in
terms of ends and means, it is utilitarian or
pragmatic. It is an ethics without duties or moral
obligations. The word "deontological" is
philosophical jargon for an ethics or moral
philosophy the principles of which are imperatives
that prescribe duties.
A moral philosophy can be both pragmatic and
deontological. Aristotle's Ethics is both.
Ends and means are certainly present in it, but it
also contains principles that are prescriptive of
duties or moral obligations.
The moral philosophy of Immanuel Kant is wholly
deontological. It rejects what Kant calls "the
serpentine windings of utilitarianism." J.S. Mill's
Utilitarianism contains the opposite error:
it is purely pragmatic, and has great difficulty
with the notion of duty or moral obligation.
Source: Adler's
Philosophical Dictionary: 125 Key Terms for the
Philosopher's Lexicon. Have you a copy of
this book in your personal library? If not,
consider getting one. Read Max Weismann's review of
this book by Clicking
Here.
THE
PHILOSOPHERS SPEAK
Morris
Raphael Cohen (1880-1947), American
philosopher
Cohen's contributions have been many in the
fields of social, political and legal philosophy.
He described his view in general as realistic
rationalism, a view that emphasizes the importance
of intellect or reason as applied to what is,
rather than in vacuo. He found the principle of
polarity a fruitful means of resolving antinomies.
The principle of polarity is a naturalistic version
of Hegel's dialectics of nature, according to which
reality and thought involve numerous opposites,
such as action-reaction, motion-rest, life-death,
truth-falsity. As a creative thinker, Cohen was not
a great success. In fact, he came to view his life
as utterly wasted. After his death on January 25,
1947, Cohen left his son, Felix, now also dead,
little more than a mass of notes and unfinished
manuscripts to read and eventually to edit. His
best known works are Reason
and Nature and Law
and the Social Order. Here is a very
brief passage from one of his works dealing with
logic:
- Logic does not provide the food which
sustains our intellectual life. That must come
from our factual knowledge and insight. Logic
also may be denied the characterization of being
the motive power which sets inquiry going. It
is, however, like the hydrochloric acid in our
stomach that helps to digest our food. It is the
antiseptic of our intellectual life which
prevents our food from poisoning us. For the
impressions we take into our minds will confuse
us unless we order them according to some
logical principle.
Excerpted from A
Preface to Logic. Read more about
Morris
Raphael Cohen in The Radical Academy.
FOR THE
RECORD
1.
Nobody Read The Stimulus Bill, by James W.
Harris
The massive $787 billion 2009 "stimulus" bill --
possibly
the largest spending bill in U.S. history --
was received by all Congressional members at 11
p.m. Thursday evening, February 12.
The gigantic bill was 1,073 pages long, with an
additional 421 page Explanatory Statement. Read the
billFurther, portions of the bill consisted of
hand-written last-minute insertions.
As the small-government lobbying group Downsize
DC notes, the bill is filled with:
- Hand-written copy-editing;
- Insertions scrawled in the margins;
- Typographical deletions of whole
paragraphs;
- And "a variety of curious hash marks and
other annotations."
Yet a mere 15 hours later, around 4 pm, the U.S.
House passed it -- appropriately enough, on Friday
13th.
The Senate passed it just 3 hours and 5 minutes
later.
Yes, that's right. Congress passed this complex,
far-reaching, revolutionary bill in a matter of
hours, without taking enough time to even learn
what was in it, let alone read it, or even read
most of it.
The conservative Heritage Foundation declared:
"[N]ever have we seen a bill more cloaked
in secrecy or more withdrawn from open public
exposure and honest debate."
Downsize DC points out this happened
despite:
- President Obama's repeated campaign promises
of transparency in government, including a
pledge not to sign bills that aren't posted
online for the public to read for at least five
days before the final vote is cast.
and:
- Speaker Nancy Pelosi's promise that the
final version of the stimulus bill would be
posted online for at least 48 hours before the
vote.
James
W. Harris is the editor of Liberator Online, a
publication of Advocates
for
Self-Government.
His articles have appeared in numerous magazines
and newspapers, and he has been a Finalist for the
Mencken Award, given by the Free Press Association
for "Outstanding Journalism in Support of
Liberty."
2.
Half of Britons Do Not Believe In Evolution, Survey
Finds
Half of British adults do not believe in
evolution, with at least 22% preferring the
theories of creationism or intelligent design to
explain how the world came about, according to a
survey.
The poll found that 25% of Britons believe
Charles Darwin's theory of evolution is "definitely
true," with another quarter saying it is "probably
true." Half of the 2,060 people questioned were
either strongly opposed to the theory or confused
about it.
The Rescuing Darwin survey ... found that around
10% of people chose young Earth creationism--the
belief that God created the world some time in the
last 10,000 years -- over evolution.
Source: The
Guardian (UK)
3.
Lunacy And The Full Moon
Across the centuries, many a person has uttered
the phrase "There must be a full moon out there" in
an attempt to explain weird happenings at night.
Indeed, the Roman goddess of the moon bore a name
that remains familiar to us today: Luna, prefix of
the word "lunatic." Greek philosopher Aristotle and
Roman historian Pliny the Elder suggested that the
brain was the "moistest" organ in the body and
thereby most susceptible to the pernicious
influences of the moon, which triggers the
tides.
Belief in the "lunar lunacy effect," or
"Transylvania effect," as it is sometimes called,
persisted in Europe through the Middle Ages, when
humans were widely reputed to transmogrify into
werewolves or vampires during a full moon. Even
today many people think the mystical powers of the
full moon induce erratic behaviors, psychiatric
hospital admissions, suicides, homicides, emergency
room calls, traffic accidents, fights at
professional hockey games, dog bites and all manner
of strange events.
One survey revealed that 45 percent of college
students believe moonstruck humans are prone to
unusual behaviors, and other surveys suggest that
mental health professionals may be still more
likely than laypeople to hold this conviction. In
2007 several police departments in the U.K. even
added officers on full-moon nights in an effort to
cope with presumed higher crime rates.
Source: Scientific
American
4.
Brain Scans "Read Minds" With Suprising
Accuracy
Could MRI someday stand for Mind Reading
Imagery? Functional magnetic resonance imaging
(fMRI) technology can tell what people are thinking
with startling accuracy, a new study found.
Volunteers were shown two different patterns, then
asked to picture one or the other.
Using fMRI brain scans, the researchers
predicted -- at better than 80 percent -- which of
the two patterns each person was actively holding
in memory 11 seconds later. By measuring blood
flow, fMRI images reveal which groups of neurons
are active.
Some of the visual cortex's neurons are
associated more with vertical visual patterns, and
others with horizontal or angled patterns,
explained neuroscientist Frank Tong of Vanderbilt
University, who led the study. That distinction
allowed the team to predict which pattern
volunteers had in mind, even well after the images
were removed from the screen.
Source: National
Geographic News
5.
First Draft Of Neanderthal Genome
Unveiled
The first draft of the genome of a 38,000
year-old Neanderthal is complete, scientists have
announced.
Early glimpses of the genome, which was
sequenced by Svante Pääbo, of the Max
Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in
Leipzig, Germany, and colleagues, have already cast
new light on the ancient human species that went
extinct more than 25,000 years ago.
"This will be the first time the entire genome
of an extinct organism has been sequenced,"
Pääbo told the annual meeting of the
American Association for the Advancement of
Science, in Chicago. Now study of the more complete
genome will allow scientists to examine
Neanderthals' relationship with modern humans as
never before. A preliminary analysis of the
sequence suggests that Neanderthals contributed
few, if any, genes to humans via inbreeding.
Source: New
Scientist
6.
Politics In The Guise Of Pure
Science
... Dr. [Roger] Pielke, a professor in
the environmental studies program at the University
of Colorado, is the author of The Honest
Broker, a book arguing that most scientists are
fundamentally mistaken about their role in
political debates. As a result, he says, they're
jeopardizing their credibility while impeding
solutions to problems like global warming.
Most researchers, Dr. Pielke writes, like to
think of themselves in one of two roles: as a pure
researcher who remains aloof from messy politics,
or an impartial arbiter offering expert answers to
politicians' questions. Either way, they believe
their research can point the way to correct public
policies, and sometimes it does--when the science
is clear and people's values aren't in
conflict.
But climate change, like most political issues,
isn't so simple. While most scientists agree that
anthropogenic global warming is a threat, they're
not certain about its scale or its timing or its
precise consequences .... And while most members of
the public want to avoid future harm from climate
change, they have conflicting values about which
sacrifices are worthwhile today.
Source: New
York Times
7.
Quote For The Month: Leave Michael Phelps
Alone
"(S)moking pot didn't prevent Barack Obama from
becoming president. And obviously, recreational
marijuana use Michael Phelpshasn't harmed Mr.
Phelps, whose prodigious performances have garnered
14 gold medals, the most in Olympic history. If he
can smoke pot and perform at such a superhuman
level, then perhaps we should reconsider the
effects of -- and punishments for -- use of the
substance." -- Psychologist Stanton Peele, Wall
Street Journal, Feb. 5, 2009.
COUNSELING
CORNER: Avoid Putting Foot In Mouth . .
.
An ingenious example of speech and politics
occurred recently in the United Nations Assembly
and made the world community smile.
A representative from Israel began:
- Before beginning my talk I want to tell you
something about Moses. When he struck the rock
and it brought forth water, he thought, 'What a
good opportunity to have a bath!' He removed his
clothes, put them aside on the rock and entered
the water. When he got out and wanted to dress,
his clothes had vanished. A Palestinian had
stolen them.
The Palestinian representative jumped up
furiously and shouted, "What are you talking about?
The Palestinians weren't there then."
The Israeli representative smiled and said, "And
now that we have made that clear, I will begin my
speech."
A
LITTLE OF THIS & A LITTLE OF
THAT
A Little Wisdom: The most pathetic person
in the world is someone who has sight but has no
vision.
A Little Advice: Share your knowledge.
It's a way to achieve immortality.
A Little Quip: Reality is the leading
cause of stress among those in touch with it.
A Little Proverb: If you want your eggs
hatched, sit on them yourself.
A Little Question: Despite the cost of
living, have you noticed how it remains so
popular?
A Little Reflection: It will be a great
day when our schools have all the money they need
and the Air Force has to hold a bake sale to buy a
new bomber.
A Little Request: "All I ask is a chance
to prove that money can't make me happy."
A Little Admission: I started out with
nothing... I still have most of it.
A Little Observation: The enemy
invariably attacks on one of two occasions: 1. When
you're ready for them and 2. When you're not
ready for them.
A Little Warning: "We often give enemies
the means of our own destruction." -- Aesop
(620-560 BC), Greek storyteller.
A Little Quote: "The truth is often a
terrible weapon of aggression. It is possible to
lie, and even to murder, with the truth." -- Alfred
Adler (1870-1937), Austrian psychiatrist.
A Little Put-Down: Women don't make fools
of men - most of them are the do-it-yourself
types.
ELSEWHERE
ON THE INTERNET
Some interesting & provocative articles
on other websites:
Learn
Philosophy -- The classic discipline can help with
contemporary dilemmas and modern careers, by Diane
Cole: The questions are ripped from the daily
head-lines: Should illegal immigrants be barred
from enrolling in public universities? Should
courts declare surreptitiously gathered DNA off
limits as legal evidence?
The
5th Element: We can trace the history of
Chinese metaphysics to the Yellow Emperor. In 2700
BC, he associated everything with the five
elements.
Good
heavens - Vatican rehabilitating Galileo: The
Church has for years been striving to shed its
reputation for being hostile to science, in part by
producing top-notch research out of its own
telescope.
Research
Finds We are Still Willing to Inflict Pain: It
was one of the most infamous experiments in
history, offering compelling evidence that almost
everybody is capable of great evil. Almost 50 years
on, it has finally been repeated by scientists -
showing that people today are still willing to hurt
others when prompted by an authority figure.
Rethinking
science and religion, by Howard Smith:
Politicians, and everyday Americans, too, are
thinking about new approaches to national policy.
One that is ripe for reassessment is the
appropriate role of religion in matters of science.
Religion provides us, as individuals, with its
ethical and human perspectives on civic decisions,
including judgments on issues prompted by
scientific discoveries.
|