|
Index for this
page...
All The Following Items Were Posted On April 1,
2009
FROM
THE MORTIMER ADLER FILE
Civil Disobedience: What are the
conditions that justify dissent from civil
government, and how does justifiable disobedience
to civil government differ from rebellion?
One ground for civil disobedience is religious.
Quakers who regard killing in was as sinful disobey
the draft laws by being conscientious objectors. At
the same time, they do not withdraw their consent
to civil government, and they voluntarily submit to
the treatment that their government inflicts on
those who refuse to be drafted.
Another ground for civil disobedience may be
that the deserter regards the war being fought as
unjust. The conscientious objector in this case
refuses to participate in it. Again, the individual
must be willing to take whatever treatment is
accorded those who disobey the law.
Disobedience to civil government may also
involve withdrawal of consent. When it is peaceful,
that act requires emigration, as with those who
opposed the war in Vietnam, and went to Canada or
Sweden for the duration. They required a
declaration of amnesty to return to the United
States and resume their status as citizens.
Violent disobedience constitutes rebellion or
civil war. This resistance is civil in name only,
since the authority of the government is not only
denied but resisted by resort to arms.
Our war of independence and our civil war were
acts of rebellion, involving denial or rejection of
civil status by those who opposed the government.
Nevertheless, Lincoln's declaration amnesty to the
rebellious population of the southern states
restored them to citizenship in the republic, in
effect nullifying their rebellion.
Source: Adler's
Philosophical Dictionary: 125 Key Terms for the
Philosopher's Lexicon. Have you a copy of
this book in your personal library? If not,
consider getting one. Read Max Weismann's review of
this book by Clicking
Here.
THE
PHILOSOPHERS SPEAK
Friedrich
Nietzsche (1844-1900) German existentialist
philosopher
Nietzsche's discovery and description of
"resentment," to mention only one of his major
achievements, stamps him as one of the
philosophical psychologists of the last century.
His critique of the antiquated and false values of
the educated middle class led prewar generations to
the pursuit of an ethics of more realistic ideals.
He was the first to recognize a fundamental
critical difference between the philosopher and the
scientist. He found those genuine ideals in the
pre-Socratic period of Greek culture which he
regarded as essential standards for the deepening
of individuality and real culture in the deepest
sense, towards which the special and natural
sciences, and professional or academic philosophers
failed to contribute. Nietzsche wanted the
philosopher to be prophetic, originally
forward-looking in the clarification of the problem
of existence. More interested in developing a
philosophy of life than a system of academic
philosophy, his view is that only that life is
worth living which develops the strength and
integrity to withstand the unavoidable sufferings
and misfortunes of existence without flying into an
imaginary world. Let's take a brief look at his
philosophizing, wherein he takes apart our notion
of "truth":
- What is this unconditional will to truth?
... What do we know from the outset of the
character of existence, which can enable us to
decide whether it is best to be on the side of
the unconditionally mistrustful or of the
unconditionally trusting? Yet if both are
required, much trust and mistrust: from where
can science take its unconditional faith, the
conviction on which it rests, that truth is more
important than anything else, even than any
other conviction? This conviction could not have
come into being if both truth and untruth showed
themselves to be continually useful, as is the
case. So although there undeniably exists a
faith in science, it cannot derive from such a
utilitarian calculus but must instead have
originated in spite of the fact that the
inutility and the dangerousness of the "will to
truth," of "truth at any price" are proved to it
continually. ...
-
- Therefore "will to truth" does not mean "I
will not let myself be deceived" but there is no
alternative "I will not deceive, not even
myself": and here we are on the ground of
morality. We must ask ourselves carefully: "Why
don't we want to deceive?" especially if it
appears -- and it certainly does appear -- that
life depends on appearance: I mean, on error,
falsehood, deception, self-deception; and where
life has, in fact, always shown itself to be on
the side of the most unscrupulous multiplicity.
Such an intent, interpreted charitably, could
possibly be a quixotism, a degree of
enthusiastic impudence; but it could also be
something worse, namely, a destructive
principle, hostile to life. "Will to truth" --
this could be a concealed will to death.
-
- So the question "Why science?" leads back to
the moral problem. "Why is there any morality at
all?" if life, nature, and history are "not
moral"? ... Yet you will have understood by now
what I am driving at, namely, that it always
remains a metaphysical faith upon which our
faith in science rests that even we modern
scholars, we godless ones and
antimetaphysicians, still kindle our fire too
from the flame which a faith thousands of years
old has kindled: that Christian faith, which was
also Plato's faith, that God is truth, that
truth is divine. ...
Excerpted from The
Gay Science, by Friedrich Nietzsche.
Read about Friedrich
Nietzsche in The Radical Academy. Check out the
books by and about Friedrich Nietzsche in The
Radical Academy Bookstore.
FOR THE
RECORD
Politics:
Government
Wrecks "Dr. Do-Good's" Low-Cost Health Care Plan,
by James W. Harris
Build a better mousetrap and... the government
will beat a path to your door -- and shut it
down.
John MuneyThat's what happened to Dr.
John Muney, a former surgeon who runs the AMG
Medical Group clinics in New York's five
boroughs.
Dr. Muney wanted to help patients who lacked
health insurance receive medical care.
So, last year, he came up with an innovative
market solution. For just $79 a month, his clinics
would offer patients unlimited office visits (with
a $10 copay), common tests including bloodworm,
sonogram, x-ray as needed, physical therapy visits,
and even in-office surgeries. Not included was
treatment requiring hospitalization or specialized
care.
This innovative, affordable plan led the New
York Post to label Dr. Muney "Dr. Do-Good."
However, the New York state government has
stopped Dr. Do-Good. Why? The state Insurance
Department declared his service was, in essence, a
form of insurance -- and that would require a
license, certification, and regulation from the
state.
"I'm not doing an insurance business," a
frustrated Dr. Muney responded. "I'm just providing
my services at my place during certain hours.
"If they leave me alone, I can serve thousands
of patients."
But they won't leave him alone. So, in order to
avoid being shut down, he has been forced to more
than triple his per office co-pay charge and cut
back service for his uninsured patients.
"I really don't want to charge more," Dr. Muney
says. "They're forcing me. ... I just wanted to
charge the flat rate. Most likely,
[patients] will struggle with it."
Dr. Muney is fighting
back, and his story is drawing media attention.
Many citizens are outraged at the arrogance of
bureaucrats who would cripple a plan designed to
help the very people -- Americans lacking health
insurance -- so many in government say they are so
concerned about.
Dr. Muney's story is more proof that the real
healthcare problems America faces are caused by
politicians and bureaucrats, not the market.
Source: Liberator
Online
James
W. Harris is the editor of Liberator Online, a
publication of Advocates
for
Self-Government.
His articles have appeared in numerous magazines
and newspapers, and he has been a Finalist for the
Mencken Award, given by the Free Press Association
for "Outstanding Journalism in Support of
Liberty."
Religion
& Science:
Humans
May Be Primed To Believe In Creation
Religion might not be the only reason people buy
into creationism and intelligent design,
psychological experiments suggest.
No matter what their religious beliefs,
college-educated adults frequently agree with
purpose-seeking yet false explanations of natural
phenomena--finches diversified in order to survive,
for instance.
"The very fact of belief in purpose itself might
lead you to favor intelligent design," says Deborah
Kelemen, a psychologist at Boston University, who
led the study
Source: New
Scientist
Vatican
Signals Its Embrace Of Science
The Vatican has sought to show that it isn't
opposed to science and evolutionary theory, hosting
a conference on Charles Darwin and trying to debunk
the idea that it embraces creationism or
intelligent design.
Some of the world's top biologists,
paleontologists and molecular geneticists joined
theologians and philosophers for the five-day
seminar marking the 150th anniversary of Darwin's
The Origin of Species.
Cardinal William Levada, head of the Vatican's
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, said
the Catholic Church doesn't stand in the way of
scientific realities like evolution, saying there
was a "wide spectrum of room" for belief in both
the scientific basis for evolution and faith in God
the creator.
Source: Boston
Globe
Philosophy
of Science:
Second
Genesis: Life, But Not As We Know It
When the Nobel prizewinning physicist Richard
Feynman died in 1988, his blackboard carried the
inscription, "What I cannot create, I do not
understand." By that measure, biologists still have
a lot to learn, because no one has yet succeeded in
turning a chemical soup into a living, reproducing,
evolving life form. We're still stuck with Life
1.0, the stuff that first quickened at least 3.5
billion years ago. There's been nothing new under
the sun since then, as far as we know.
That looks likely to change. Around the world,
several labs are drawing close to the threshold of
a second genesis, an achievement that some would
call one of the most profound scientific
breakthroughs of all time. David Deamer, a
biochemist at the University of California, Santa
Cruz, has been saying that scientists would create
synthetic life in "five or 10 years" for three
decades, but finally he might actually be right.
"The momentum is building," he says. "We're
knocking at the door."
Meanwhile, a no-less profound search is on for a
"shadow biosphere" -- life forms that are unrelated
to the life we know because they are descendants of
an independent origin of life.
Source: New
Scientist
Philosophical
Psychology & Epistemology:
What
Can Magicians Teach Us About The
Brain?
A magician tosses a ball into the air once,
twice, three times. Suddenly, the ball vanishes in
mid-flight. What happened?
Don't worry, the laws of physics haven't been
broken. Magicians do not have supernatural powers;
rather, they are masters of exploiting nuances of
human perception, attention, and awareness.
In light of this, a recent Nature Reviews
Neuroscience paper, coauthored by a combination of
neuroscientists ... and magicians ... describes
various ways magicians manipulate our perceptions,
and proposes that these methods should inform and
aid the neuroscientific study of attention and
awareness.
Source: Scientific
American
History:
DNA
Testing Ends Mystery Surrounding Czar Nicholas II
Children
The most enduring and romantic legend of the
Russian Revolution--that two children of Czar
Nicholas II and his wife, Alexandra, survived the
slaughter that killed the rest of their family--may
finally be put to rest with the positive
identification of bone fragments from a lonely
Russian grave.
The czar and his family were gunned down and
stabbed by members of the Red Guard early on the
morning of July 17, 1918, but rumors have persisted
that two of the children, the Grand Duchess
Anastasia and her brother Alexei, survived ...
Those hopes were bolstered with the 1991
revelation that nine bodies of Romanov family
members and servants had been found in a
Yekaterinberg grave, but that a son and daughter
were still missing. Now, newly analyzed DNA
evidence from a second, nearby grave discovered in
2007 proves that the bones are those of two Romanov
children, ending the mystery once and for all. A
report on the analysis was published online Tuesday
in the journal PLoS ONE.
Source: Los
Angeles Times
Politics
& Economic Philosophy:
Quote
For The Month: Jay Leno On The
Stimulus
"The country of China is going to be doing a
Broadway-style play based on Karl Marx's book on
communism. A play based on communism. You know,
that's where capitalism has been replaced by the
government taking over control of all private
industries. Or as we call in this country, 'a
stimulus package.'" -- Source: The Tonight
Show, March 24.
A
LITTLE OF THIS & A LITTLE OF
THAT
A Little Wisdom: The beloved of the
Almighty are the rich who have the humility of the
poor, and the poor who have the magnanimity of the
rich.
A Little Advice: When you're in it up to
your ears, keep your mouth shut!
A Little Quip: At least dogs do what you
tell them to do. Cats take a message and get back
to you.
A Little Proverb: Testosterone is a great
equalizer. It turns all men into morons.
A Little Question: I love to give
homemade gifts... which one of my kids do you
want?
A Little Reflection: Life: Too
many freaks, not enough circuses!
A Little One-Liner: Who can I blame for
my own problems? Give me just a minute ... I'll
find someone.
A Little Admission: I want to die in my
sleep like my grandfather... Not screaming and
yelling like the passengers in his bus.
A Little Observation: Death and taxes are
inevitable; but at least death doesn't get worse
every year.
A Little Warning: Raising teenagers is
like nailing Jell-O to a tree.
A Little Quote: "There are only two
reasons to sit in the back row of an airplane:
Either you have diarrhea, or you're anxious to meet
people who do." -- Henry Kissenger (former US
Secretary of State).
A Little Politics: For every action,
there is an equal and opposite government
program.
ELSEWHERE
ON THE INTERNET
Some interesting & provocative articles
on other websites:
The
Political Philosophy of James Hansen: James
Hansen of NASA has written an op-ed for the
Guardian that, more than any other piece of his
that I've seen, expresses his political philosophy.
In a phrase, that philosophy can be characterized
as "scientific authoritarianism." Scientific
authoritarianism, as I am using it here, holds that
political decisions should be compelled by the
political preferences of scientists. It is a very
strong form of the "linear model" of science and
decision making that I discuss in The Honest
Broker. Hansen believes that the advice of experts,
and specifically his advice alone, should compel
certain political outcomes. He opens his op-ed in
the Guardian with this statement: ...
Darwin's
seminal impact on biology, anthropology, philosophy
and psychology: Franois-Joseph Lapointe, a
biology professor at the Universit de Montral, has
been teaching the theory of natural selection for
two decades. The theory stipulates that all
organisms best suited to their environment survive
and pass on their genetic characteristics to
succeeding generations. De facto, organisms that
are less adapted tend to be eliminated. "I have
taught these principles to my girlfriend, my
children and I have defended them to creationists.
It is surely the one concept I have explained the
most often in my life," says Lapointe. According to
Lapointe, On the Origin of the Species must
be continually reinterpreted in light of new
knowledge. This is contrary to the Bible, which
creationists believe is a text set in stone.
...
Examined
Life takes philosophy to the streets, by Chance
McAllister: Examined Life is the curious
mind's dream. The film, directed by Astra Taylor,
unleashes prominent intellectuals such as Cornel
West, Peter Singer and Slavoj Zizek on the streets
to discuss philosophical ideas. Although each
intellectual is only given a ten minute segment,
the viewer can get a sense of the importance of
philosophy in one's life. Further, this briefer
exploration of each idea opens the film up to
include more than just the anticipated
philosophy-heads and other intellectually driven
characters. It is personal exploration and rigorous
intellectualism made entertaining. This is helped
by the setting of each segment. Each subject is
placed in an environment that is considered
unfamiliar for that kind of philosophical
discussion. For example, Peter Singer talks ethics
while walking around 5th Avenue. ...
|