|
XVII. The
Esthetic Aspect of the Universe
Topics:
- A. Art, Nature, and Beauty
- B. Objective and subjective aspect of
beauty
A. Art, Nature, and
Beauty
Themselves contemporaries of a tremendous
artistic development, which ranks the thirteenth
century among the great creative epochs, the
Schoolmen did not neglect the study of beauty in
art. Any external product of man may possess
beauty, -- that of an artisan who makes furniture
just as much as that of a painter of pictures or a
builder of cathedrals. There is no essential
distinction between arts and fine arts. If a man
transforms preexisting realities, then he is an
artist, and the work of art is, says Dante, by
reason of this act, a godlike creation.
Nature also is beautiful. St. Bonaventure
compares the universe to a magnificent symphony;
Duns Scotus likens it to a superb tree. For the
universe realizes and expresses order and
purpose.
But beauty is not studied from the special point
of view of nature or of art. Scholastic philosophy
considers it in a general way, and esthetics
becomes a department of metaphysics and psychology.
Let us select therefrom some special points.
B. Objective and
subjective aspect of beauty
Above all beauty is real and has an objective
aspect: it is not a mere mental attitude. Beauty
belongs to certain external things. Where is it
found? In those things which realize and manifest
an order variously described as the
commensuratio partium elegans by Albert the
Great, aequalitas numerosa by Bonaventura,
debita proportio by Thomas Aquinas.
Multiplicity of parts, variety, and unity of plan
which combines the parts into one coherent whole,
-- such are the elements of order found in all
beauty. The beauty of a being is the flowering of
the reality which it ought to possess according to
its nature, and which is called its natural
perfection. Accordingly the unity which beauty
expresses is a function of the specific principle
to which each real being owes its fundamental
determination, and which we have called its form
(IX, D). "The beautiful unites everything it
touches, and it is able to do so thanks to the form
of the being, which it sets out in relief"
[1]. Perfection and form are both
teleological functions. That is why the beauty of
one thing is distinct from the beauty of another.
An artist who wishes to paint the image of Christ
"must reveal in the face the light of his Divinity"
[2].
But not everything ordered is thereby beautiful.
Order becomes esthetic only when it speaks
clearly and with no uncertain voice to a human
intelligence by means of sensations, and
thus brings to the mind the pleasure of
disinterested contemplation. Only the intelligence,
which has being as its object, is able to penetrate
through to the 'form,' and discern it in the midst
of the sense impression and material data in which
it manifests itself. Here once more scholasticism
asserts its intellectualism.
Thus the objective aspect of beauty is completed
by the subjective aspect, or the impression which
the beautiful produces within us. The order of
things is necessarily adapted to an act of mental
contemplation of which it is the content and
terminus. Or, as the Schoolmen would say, order,
and above all the form of the being, must shine
forth to the mind. This relationship between the
beautiful object and the knowing subject is seen in
the theory of the claritas pulcri, or
brilliancy of beauty. The more the form shines out,
the greater and deeper will be the impression upon
the human soul. It will be the 'substantial form'
bursting through the perfection of a type or a
species, as for instance when a Greek statue
represents a typical human being; or more often
some 'accidental form' may shine out [3],
as for instance an attitude of a mother smiling to
her child. The brilliancy of the form is a
principle of unity freely chosen by the artist in
the work of art.
Beauty therefore does not belong exclusively to
things as the Greeks thought, nor to the subject
alone who reacts and enjoys, as some contemporary
philosophers maintain. But it is as it were midway
between object and subject, and consists in a
correspondence between the two.
Notes:
1. Albertus Magnus, Opusc. de pulcro.
2. In Davidem, Ps. 44, 2.
3. Albertus Magnus, Opusc. de pulcro.
Notio pulcri, in universali consistit in
resplendentia formae (accidentalis) super partes
materiae proportionatas, vel super diversas vires
vel actiones.
<
Previous Page
---- Next
Page >
|