|
George J. Irbe's
Favorite Quotes from Aristotle on Selected
Topics
What
did Aristotle say about:
God
Good
and bad
Note:
The source book for a quotation is indicated
by:
NE
for Nicomachean Ethics
POL for Politics
MET for Metaphysics
RHE for Rhetoric
SL for On the Soul
The
location of the start of a quotation is given by
the 'Berlin number' which designates, by
established convention, the consecutively numbered
pages of all of Aristotle's works in the original
Greek, and a line number on the page ('a' for left
and 'b' for right side of the page. The last name
of the translator of the quotation is also
indicated.
God
MET [1072b24] (Ross, XII, vii) If, then,
the manner of God's existence is as good as ours
sometimes is, but eternally, then this is
marvelous, and if it is better, this is still more
marvelous; and it is the latter. And life belongs
to God, for the actuality of the intellect
is life, and He is actuality; and His
actuality is in virtue of itself as life
which is the best and is eternal. We say that God
is a living being which is eternal and the best; so
life and continuous duration and eternity belong to
God, for this is God.
MET [1075a7] (Apostle) Is it not the
case that what has no matter is indivisible, like
human intellect, or even that which is thinking of
a composite object in an interval of time? For it
does not possess goodness in this part or in that
part but possesses the highest good in the whole,
though it is distinct from it. It is in this manner
that Thinking is the thinking of Himself through
all eternity.
NE [1178b21] (Rackham, X, viii, 7) the
activity of God, which is transcendent in
blessedness, is the activity of contemplation; and
therefore among human activities that which is most
akin to the divine activity of contemplation will
be the greatest source of happiness.
POL [1323b22] (Jowett) . . each one has
just so much of happiness as he has of virtue and
wisdom, and of virtuous and wise action. God is a
witness to us of this truth, for he is happy and
blessed, not by reason of any external good, but in
himself and by reason of his own nature.
POL [1325b28] (Jowett) . . God and the
universe . . have no external actions over and
above their own energies . .
POL [1326a31] (Jowett) . . to introduce
order into the unlimited is the work of a divine
power - of such a power as holds together the
universe.
Good and bad
NE [1094a1] (Rackham, I, i, 1) Every art
and every investigation, and likewise every
practical pursuit or undertaking, seems to aim at
some good: hence it has been well said that the
Good is That at which all things aim.
NE [1094a1] (Ross) Every art and every
investigation, and similarly every action and
pursuit, is considered to aim at some good. Hence
the Good has been rightly defined as "that at which
all things aim".
NE [1094a18] (Ross) If, then, there is
some end of the things we do, which we desire for
its own sake (everything else being desired for the
sake of this), and if we do not choose everything
for the sake of something else (for at that rate
the process would go on to infinity, so that our
desire would be empty and vain), clearly this must
be the good and the chief good.
NE [1098a7](Rackham, I, vii, 14) . . if
we declare that the function of man is a certain
form of life, and define that form of life as the
exercise of the soul's faculties and activities in
association with rational principle, and say that
the function of a good man is to perform these
activities well and rightly, and if a function is
well performed when it is performed in accordance
with its own proper excellence &endash; from these
premises it follows that the Good of man is the
active exercise of his soul's faculties in
conformity with excellence or virtue, or if there
be several human excellences and virtues, in
conformity with the best and most perfect among
them. Moreover this activity must occupy a complete
lifetime; for one swallow does not make spring, nor
does one fine day; and similarly one day or a brief
period of happiness does not make a man supremely
blessed and happy.
NE [1098a14] (Rackham, I, vii, 15) the
Good of man is the active exercise of his soul's
faculties in conformity with excellence or
virtue.
NE [1098b18] (Rackham, I, viii, 3) . .
the End is included among goods of the soul, and
not among external goods.
NE [1099a17] (Thomson) Indeed, we may go
further and assert that anyone who does not delight
in fine actions is not even a good man.
NE [1100b28] (Rackham, I, x,12) . .
great and frequent reverses can crush and mar our
bliss both by the pain they cause and by the
hindrance they offer to many activities. Yet
nevertheless even in adversity nobility shines
through, when a man endures repeated and severe
misfortune with patience, not owing to
insensibility but from generosity and greatness of
soul.
NE [1102a15] (Rackham, I, xiii, 5) Now
the goodness that we have to consider is clearly
human goodness, since the good or happiness which
we set out to seek was human good and human
happiness. But human goodness means in our view
excellence of soul, not excellence of body;
NE [1104b31] (Rackham, II, iii, 7) There
are three things that are the motives of choice and
three that are the motives of avoidance; namely,
the noble, the expedient, and the pleasant, and
their opposites, the base, the harmful, and the
painful. Now in respect of all these the good man
is likely to go right and the bad to go wrong, but
especially in respect of pleasure; for pleasure is
common to man with the lower animals, and also it
is a concomitant of all the objects of choice,
since both the noble and the expedient appear to us
pleasant.
NE [1106a24] (Rackham, II, vi, 3) . .
excellence or virtue in a man will be the
disposition which renders him a good man and also
which will cause him to perform his function
well.
NE [1106b29](Rackham, II, vi, 14) . . .
error is multiform (for evil is a form of the
unlimited, as in the old Pythagorean imagery, and
good of the limited), whereas success is possible
in one way only (which is why it is easy to fail
and difficult to succeed &endash; easy to miss the
target and difficult to hit it); so this is another
reason why excess and deficiency are a mark of
vice, and observance of the mean a mark of virtue:
Goodness is simple, badness is manifold.
NE [1114a18] (Rackham, III, v, 14) When
you have thrown a stone, you cannot afterwards
bring it back again, but nevertheless you are
responsible for having taken up the stone and flung
it, for the origin of the act was within you.
Similarly the unjust and profligate might at the
outset have avoided becoming so, and therefore they
are so voluntarily, although when they have become
unjust and profligate it is no longer open to them
not to be so.
NE [1123b17] (Rackham, IV, iii, 10) Now
the greatest external good we should assume to be
the thing which we offer as a tribute to the gods,
and which is most coveted by men of high station,
and is the prize awarded for the noblest deeds; and
such a thing is honor, for honor is clearly the
greatest of external goods.
NE [1123b27] (Rackham, IV, iii, 14) And
inasmuch as the great-souled man deserves most, he
must be the best of men; for the better a man is
the more he deserves, and he that is best deserves
most. Therefore the truly great-souled man must be
a good man. Indeed greatness in each of the virtues
would seem to go with greatness of soul.
NE [1144a29] (Rackham, VI, xii, 10) . .
that eye of the soul [mature intelligence]
of which we spoke cannot acquire the quality of
Prudence without possessing Virtue. This we have
said before, and it is manifestly true. For
deductive inferences about matters of conduct
always have a major premise of the form 'Since the
End of Supreme Good is so and so' (whatever it may
be, since we may take it as anything we like for
the sake of the argument); but the Supreme Good
only appears good to the good man: vice perverts
the mind and causes it to hold false views about
the first principles of conduct. Hence it is clear
that we cannot be prudent without being good.
NE [1144b13] (Rackham, VI, xiii, 2) . .
if a man of good natural disposition acquires
Intelligence [as a whole], then he excels
in conduct, and the disposition which previously
only resembled Virtue, will now be Virtue in the
true sense. Hence just as with the faculty of
forming opinions [the calculative faculty]
there are two qualities, Cleverness and Prudence,
so also in the moral part of the soul there are two
qualities, natural virtue and true Virtue; and true
Virtue cannot exist without Prudence.
NE [1144b30] (Rackham, VI, xiii, 6) . .
it is not possible to be good in the true sense
without Prudence, nor to be prudent without Moral
Virtue. (Moreover, this might supply an answer to
the dialectical argument that might be put forward
to prove that the virtues can exist in isolation
from each other, on the grounds that the same man
does not possess the greatest natural capacity for
all of them, so that he may have already attained
one when he has not yet attained another. In regard
to the natural virtues this is possible; but it is
not possible in regard to those virtues which
entitle a man to be called good without
qualification. For if a man have the one virtue of
Prudence he will also have all the Moral Virtues
together with it.)
NE [1169a12] (Rackham, IX, viii, 6) . .
the good man will be a lover of self in the fullest
degree, though in another sense than the lover of
self so-called by way of reproach, from whom he
differs as much as living by principle differs from
living by passion, and aiming at what is noble from
aiming at what is expedient. Persons therefore who
are exceptionally zealous in noble actions are
universally approved and commended; and if all men
vied with each other in moral nobility and strove
to perform the noblest deeds, the common welfare
would be fully realized, while individuals also
could enjoy the greatest of goods, inasmuch as
virtue is the greatest good.
Therefore the good man ought to be a lover of
self, since he will then both benefit himself by
acting nobly and aid his fellows; but the bad man
ought not to be a lover of self, since he will
follow his base passions, and so injure both
himself and his neighbors. With the bad man
therefore, what he does is not in accord with what
he ought to do, but the good man does what he
ought, since intelligence always chooses for itself
that which is best, and the good man obeys his
intelligence.
NE [1179b1] (Rackham, X, ix, 2) . . to
know what virtue is is not enough; we must endeavor
to possess and to practice it, or in some other
manner actually ourselves to become good.
POL [1328a38] (Jowett) . . happiness is
the highest good, being a realization and perfect
practice of virtue, which some can attain, while
others have little or none of it, . .
POL [1332a8] (Jowett) We maintain, and
have said in the Ethics, if the arguments
there adduced are of any value, that happiness is
the realization and perfect exercise of virtue, and
this not conditional, but absolute. And I used the
term 'conditional' to express that which is
indispensable, and 'absolute' to express that which
is good in itself.
POL [1332a11] (Jowett) Take the case of
just actions; just punishments and chastisements do
indeed spring from a good principle, but they are
good only because we cannot do without them - it
would be better that neither individuals nor states
should need anything of the sort - but actions
which aim at honor and advantage are absolutely the
best. The conditional action is only the choice of
a lesser evil; whereas these are the foundation and
creation of good. A good man may make the best even
of poverty and disease, and the other ills of
life;
POL [1332a22] (Jowett) . . the good man
is he for whom, because he is virtuous, the things
that are absolutely good are good; it is also plain
that his use of these goods must be virtuous and in
the absolute sense good.
POL [1333a32] (Jowett) . . of actions
some aim at what is necessary and useful, and some
at what is honorable. And the preference given to
one or the other class of actions must necessarily
be like the preference given to one or other part
of the soul and its actions over the other; there
must be war for the sake of peace, business for the
sake of leisure, things useful and necessary for
the sake of things honorable.
|