|
Section 3:
The Fact of Finality in the Bodily
World
Topics:
- a. Finality;
- b. The Ultimate End of the World;
- c. Nature.
a)
Finality
Finality is final tendency or teleological
tendency; it is tendency towards an end, a
purpose, a goal.
That bodies exercise such tendency is manifest.
Bodies tend to hold on to existence, each in its
own nature and order, and existence is surrendered
only to compelling forces of destruction which come
from other bodies. Among living bodies, the
tendency to grow, to attain a rounded maturity and
fruitfulness, is evident to anyone who ever planted
a garden or noticed the development of animals or
of children. No one denies that things in this
bodily world tend to proper and proportionate ends.
But some persons deny that this tendency is the
manifestation of a purpose, of a
design; they deny that this tendency is
something intended by the Creator, and that it
points on to an ultimate end. Against these we
assert the theory of full finality, of end
intended, of an ultimate end of the world.
(When? Who knows!)
b) The Ultimate End of
the World
By the word "end," in its present use, we mean
no simple termination, no finishing and
nothing more. We mean purpose, goal, end-in-view.
The phrase "the ultimate end of the world" means
the final purpose for which the world is
made and for which it exists and
towards the fulfillment of which it constantly
tends. That there is such an end can be
shown by establishing the fact of design or
plan in the world of bodies; for design or
plan is a rational means of reaching an end, a
purpose, and, in last analysis, an ultimate
purpose or end.
In this world, natural bodies exhibit a true
intrinsic finality, for they cling to their being
and their nature, and they manifest activity that
is consistent, constant, uniformly proportionate to
the active nature of the body in each case. The
intrinsic finality or tendency of bodies is for
what is good for them: self-preservation,
quest of food, permanence of their kind through
generation or reproduction.
In a secondary way, bodies tend towards what is
good for other bodies, as by the abundance
of fruits and seeds, few of which can cause
reproduction but which serve as food for plants,
animals, and men, and which impress reasoning
creatures (that is, in the bodily world, human
beings) with the great generosity of the Giver of
good gifts. Now, this intrinsic finality of bodies
is certainly the result of a plan, and of a plan
which comes of intelligence, and ultimately of
Supreme Intelligence.
The finality of natural bodies, and their
magnificent structure which fits them admirably for
their connatural activities, are incontrovertible
evidence of design and of ultimate
intelligence, and so of Ultimate End. Nor can
imperfections in bodies be alleged as an
argument against design or finality. For
imperfections cannot be recognized as such unless
by a mind which has the grasp of a standard, by a
mind which knows what perfection in the case
means; for an imperfection is a falling short of a
recognized perfection, that is, of a
recognized design, plan, and purpose. You cannot
know what imperfect eyesight is unless you have
knowledge of what perfect eyesight is.
Imperfections are a proof of perfection, that is
of the standard. When a person objects that
such or such a body falls short of perfection, he
acknowledges the existence of the standard of
perfection and the normal tendency of a body to
attain it.
There is, then, in this world of bodies a
finality, a drive towards a certain perfection, a
tendency towards a goal or end. Now, ends are often
like steps in a stairway, one is subordinate to
another. But none of the steps has any meaning at
all except in view of the last step. It is
the ultimate end which gives meaning to all
subordinate ends. Wherever there is a series of
connected ends, there is an ultimate end.
The ultimate end of the world must be the end
established by the creator; it must be the
creator's purpose in creating. And since end
means good, the ultimate end must be the
ultimate good, the complete fulfillment of every
tendency to good. It must be the Limitless and
Necessary Good Itself. In a word, it must be
God.
Notice another conclusive argument for the truth
that God is the ultimate end of all creatures. God
is infinite wisdom; he therefore acts for a most
worthy end. But before creation (to speak in
imperfect human terms) there is no actuality except
God alone; there is nothing that could serve as an
end except God himself. Therefore God creates all
creatures for himself; God is their ultimate
end.
c)
Nature
The nature of a thing means its working
essence. But in our present use of this term we
mean general nature, we mean all bodily
substances (since cosmology speaks only of bodies)
inasmuch as these produce or undergo effect. We
mean the active world around us: the air, the
clouds, the running streams, the minerals, the
growing plants, the singing birds, the thinking
men. We mean all bodily substances as
active.
Each natural body has its normal structure and
its normal type of activity. All bodies, -- man (in
his moral or responsible conduct) excepted, -- act
as they do by necessity. Observing bodies and their
structure and activity, we notice their constancy
and consistency. We find that water runs downhill,
that bodies tend towards the center of the earth,
that plants tend to grow to maturity and
fruitfulness, that fire burns dry wood, that water
is H2O. Such facts and occurrences are not random
or occasional, but invariable when bodies are left
in their normal condition. We make a record of our
constant experience of what bodies are and of what
they normally do. We set down such records in
physical and chemical formulas. We call them
physical laws. What we really mean in
calling our record of constant experience by the
name of law is this: the Creator, in
creating bodies, has manifestly imposed upon them,
with their physical structure, a definite range of
activity; he has given to natural bodies the law
of their being and their doing.
The constant mode of action of the universe in
its larger parts (interplanetary attraction,
coherency of solar systems, activities in
interstellar space such as cosmic radiation) is
expressed in formulas called cosmic laws.
The constant mode of being and of action of earthly
bodies is expressed in formulas called physical
laws. Both cosmic laws and physical laws are
called natural laws or laws of
nature. We must be very careful to make a clean
distinction between natural laws and the
natural law; for the natural law (always
with an article) means the eternal law for human
conduct inasmuch as this is knowable to sound human
reason. In a word, the
natural law is the naturally knowable moral
law. On the other hand, natural
laws (or laws of nature) are cosmic
laws and physical laws which necessitate
(inasmuch as they are ordinances of the Creator)
the activity of bodies as such, but have no concern
with the free-will acts of man.
The harmony of nature so charmed the ancient
Greeks that some of them, -- notably the
Pythagoreans, -- considered it the very essential
of bodily reality, and so declared that the one
suitable name for the bodily world is cosmos
or "the beautiful" or "the well ordered." This
harmony is noticed in individual natures too, in
the complexity and balance of their parts, in their
remarkable fitness for their proper activities. But
it is in the larger sense that we consider the
harmony of nature; we take it as a suitable
arrangement of bodies in the material world for
their seemly mutual activities in view of their
common ultimate end. This world-harmony we call
the order of nature. The working out of the
order of nature, or the actual exercise of natural
laws, we call the course of nature.
Summary of the
Section
In this Section we have discussed the meaning of
finality or final tendency, and have
indicated the fact of finality in the bodily
world.
We have justified this as true finality, born of
design, and intended by the
Creator.
We have learned the meaning of nature in
a general sense, and have discussed the laws of
nature, whether these be cosmic laws or
physical laws; we have learned not to
confuse these terms with the natural law
which is the naturally knowable moral law for human
conduct.
We have defined the order of nature and
the course of nature.
[ Mini-Course
Index ]
Enrich
Your Life With a Philosophy Book...
Enrich
Your Life With a Philosophy
Magazine...
|
Academy
Showcase Specials
|
|
|
|
|
|
|