|
Section 2:
Ideas and Terms
Topics:
- a) The Idea;
- b) The Expression of Ideas;
- c) The Clarification of Ideas.
a) The
Idea
An idea is
the representation of the essence of a thing in
the mind. It is an intellectual intentional
image.
By the idea we have intellectual knowledge of an
essence. This
knowledge is abstracted by the mind working
upon the findings of sense. Certain ideas are
formed by a second abstraction from ideas already
in the mind, and these are called
abstractive or
derived ideas.
The ideas of things around us in this bodily world
are formed directly by the mind from
sense-findings; these are
intuitive
ideas.
When we analyze an idea we find that it is,
first of all, a mental representation, or
intentional image, or grasp of something,
that is, of some thing. The idea of
thing (or being) is not analyzable;
it is a simple idea. But all other ideas
have this idea of thing or being as
their first element, and to this other ideas are
added as further elements. Thus all ideas except
the idea of being are compound
ideas.
The analysis of a compound idea is the breaking
up of an idea into the other ideas that are
its elements or
notes. Now, the
sum of the notes of any idea makes what is called
its
comprehension
or connotation.
Thus, for example, the comprehension of the idea
body consists of three notes, for a body
means
- a thing;
- a subsistent or substantial thing; and
- a corporeal subsistent thing.
The make-up of an idea in itself is, therefore,
its comprehension.
Now, the idea is a representation, an image. The
things which it represents or images come
together to constitute the
extension or
denotation of
the idea. Hence the extension of the idea
body is the sum or collection of all actual
and possible bodies, that is, all lifeless bodies
(liquid, solid, gaseous), and all living bodies
(plants, animals, men).
The more notes in an idea, the more accurate,
definite, and limited is its scope of application.
Thus the idea living body applies to a far
smaller number of things than the idea body.
Therefore we have an axiom:
- The more notes there are in the
comprehension of an idea, the fewer items there
are in its extensions, and vice
versa.
This is put more briefly in the following
formula:
- The great the comprehension, the less the
extension, and vice versa.
An idea, regarded from the standpoint of its
extension, is called singular when it
represents a single individual, or a single group.
Thus the idea of John Jones, or of my
father, or of this family, is a
singular idea. When the idea represents more
than one of the things that belong to its
extension, but not all, it is called
particular. Thus the idea of some
men, or a few families, or most
teachers, is a particular idea. When the idea
is used to represent its inferiors or
subjects (for so the items of its extension
are called) without any sort of limitation it is
called a universal
idea.
Now, an idea in itself is always
universal. It represents an essence, and so is, in
itself, applicable to each and every being that has
or can have that essence. A universal idea is made
particular or singular by a restriction in
its use or application.
Even when there is actually only one being which
has or can have the essence represented in the
idea, the idea is still universal. For the human
mind conceives even such a singular essence as
though it could be found verified in a
plurality of things. Thus the idea of God is
the idea of a Being unique and supreme. But the
mind, in its first vague formation of this idea,
does not advert to its uniqueness; this knowledge
comes later. Therefore we assert that the idea
as such is universal. That is to say, the
first grasp of an essence, the idea upon first
formation, is the knowing of an essence
independently of the fact that this essence may
be found verified in only one subject or
inferior.
b) The Expression of
Ideas
A human being has an inevitable tendency to
convey knowledge as well as to acquire it. The
normal mind wants to carry its ideas, judgments,
reasonings to other minds, or, at any rate, to give
them some outer expression for its own benefit or
pleasure. There is in man a natural and an
inevitable drive towards the outer expression of
knowledge.
Now, an idea is expressed outwardly by a
term. Sometimes
the idea itself is called a
mental term.
The outer expression of the idea in speech is
called an oral
term. The oral term has as its extension
and equivalent the written
term and the
gesticular
term.
A term expresses an idea, an understood meaning,
an intellectually grasped essence. It is not the
expression of feeling. A sob is not a term, nor is
a sigh, a yawn, a grunt, or a groan. A term
expresses an idea.
A term expresses and idea completely,
whether simply and explicitly or by implication.
Every word is not term, for some words do not
express ideas. Such words as prepositions,
adjectives, adverbs, are not terms in themselves,
although they are fitted to be parts of terms.
Nouns are terms, and noun equivalents or
substantives. The verb is a term when its subject
is expressed or understood and, if it be
transitive, when its predicate is also expressed or
understood; but this is true only when the verb is
used in the present indicative active. A noun
expresses an idea explicitly (for example, man,
fire, thought -); a present indicative verb
expresses an idea by implication; thus "he lives"
expresses the idea life by asserting its
presence in an individual. A term expresses an
essence or a rounded essential meaning.
A term, then, is a word or a group of words
which completely expresses an idea. A terms is the
outer sign of an idea. It is also the sign
of the thing which the idea represents.
The actual terms used in any language are
arbitrary or conventional signs; they are due to
human invention and choice. For while speech
is natural, the determination of terms in a
language is not; otherwise there would be but one
language in the world.
A term may have several possible
meanings. Thus "body" may mean a corpse, a
part of an automobile, or a group (such as "a body
of citizens"). The precise sense or meaning
in which a term is taken in any individual use is
called its
supposition.
c) The Clarification of
Ideas
When an idea is first formed it may be
obscure. To know, for instance, that a
pomegranate is a fruit is to know something
essential of it, but not all. Such knowledge is not
clear enough to allow the mind to distinguish this
fruit from other fruits. Ideas must pass from
obscurity to clarity and distinctness to be of best
service to man, and man has a tendency to bring his
ideas to their more perfect state. To this end he
analyzes his ideas and discerns their
comprehension; then he sums up his analysis in a
definition of the essence represented by the
idea. Definition is thus a means of clarifying
ideas.
Definition is an explanation of three
things:
- of the idea in the mind;
- of the thing or reality which the
idea represents; and
- of the term which expresses the
idea.
Thus the definition of man tells:
- the meaning of the idea or concept of
man in the mind;
- what the human essence is as it exists in
individual men; and
- what the word or term man means.
It is customary to speak of the definition of
terms, but this fact must not lead us to
lose sight of the full nature of definition as the
explanation of the idea, reality, and term.
A definition is a formula (of speech) which
clearly expresses the meaning of an idea, reality,
and term. It serves to clarify knowledge and to
impress it sharply upon the intellectual memory
(that is, upon the mind as memory). To
realize its purpose a definition
- must be exact;
- it must be clear;
- it must not include the term defined but
must express this in other and fuller terms;
and
- it must state the general class to which the
reality defined belongs, and then mention the
precise marks of distinction which make the
reality a specific member of that class.
A definition which fails to meet any of these
requirements may be a loose definition or a
description, but it is not a scientific or
philosophical definition. Manifestly, a definition
must be positive, not negative.
There are two types of definition,
physical and metaphysical. When a
definition tells what a thing is by naming its
actual constitution as a thing, it is a
physical
definition. Thus man is defined as "a
creature composed of body and soul."
When, however, a definition tells what a thing
is by naming the points of reality which
make it understandable, it is a
metaphysical
definition. Thus man is defined as "a
rational animal."
This latter definition sums up the points of
reality which the mind grasps in understanding what
man means:
- that he is a thing;
- that he is a subsistent thing;
- that he is a bodily-subsistent
thing;
- that he is a living-bodily-subsistent
thing;
- that he is a
sentient-living-bodily-subsistent thing;
and
- that he is a
rational-sentient-living-bodily-subsistent
thing.
All the points of reality by which man is
grasped by an adequate mind may be summed up as
animal plus rational, and thus the
metaphysical definition of man is "a
rational animal."
Another means of clarifying ideas and terms --
in a word, clarifying knowledge -- is that known as
logical
division. Definition analyzes the
comprehension of an idea and states what it finds;
logical division takes the extension of an idea and
sets the items found there in orderly groups.
Logical division is a classification of the
items or members of the extension of an idea. The
technical name for these items or member of
extension is subjects or inferiors.
Thus, to illustrate, Tom, Dick, and Harry, as well
as Mary and Jane, are subjects or
inferiors of the idea human
being.
When we classify by logical division we must
have, in each instance, a single standpoint,
otherwise confusion and not clarification of
knowledge will result from our effort. This
requirement is expressed in the rule,
- there must be, in each use of logical
division, only one principle of
division.
To classify people as "college graduates,
high school graduates, and Catholics" (as a recent
poll actually did) is wholly illogical, for the
principle of division shifts from schooling
to religion and so spoils consistency and
induces confusion.
For the rest, logical division
- must be complete, enumerating all
items in proper groups;
- it must have no overlapping of
items;
- it must be properly arranged so that
larger items are listed with their kind, then
the members of these, then the members of these
members, keeping each section of the grouping on
an even plane; and
- it must not be too detailed.
Violation of any of these rules would make
logical division an instrument of confusion instead
of clarification of knowledge.
Thus two notable means of clarifying ideas and
terms, and so two means of making knowledge more
valuable to man, are definition and
logical division.
Summary of the
Section
In this Section we have defined idea and
have learned what is meant by its
comprehension and its extension.
We have noticed that, on the score of
comprehension, ideas are simple or
compound; and that, on the score of
extension, ideas are singular, particular,
or universal. Yet we have seen that the idea
in itself and by its nature is universal.
We have learned that the idea is outwardly
expressed by the term, which is the sign of
an idea and of the reality of which the idea is the
mental representation.
We have studied two important means of
clarifying ideas (and terms), definition and
logical division.
[ Previous
Section ] [ Mini-Course
Index ] [ Next
Section ]
Enrich
Your Life With a Philosophy
Book...
|